Evaluación significativa de prácticas de laboratorioportfolios versus prueba final objetiva

  1. Jesús Manuel Fernández Oro
  2. Andrés Meana-Fernández
  3. Raúl Barrio Perotti
  4. José González Pérez 1
  5. Eduardo Blanco Marigorta 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Liburua:
XXVI Congreso Universitario de Innovación Educativa en las Enseñanzas Técnicas: libro de actas

Argitaletxea: Universidad de Oviedo

ISBN: 978-84-17445-02-7

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Orrialdeak: 644-657

Biltzarra: Congreso Universitario de Innovación Educativa en las Enseñanzas Técnicas (CUIEET) (26. 2018. Gijón)

Mota: Biltzar ekarpena

Laburpena

In this work, the results from the evaluation of the laboratory sessions in the Fluid Machinery and Systems subject of the Bachelor Degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oviedo with two different methodologies are presented: evaluation of technical reports from the sessions (individual portfolio of the students) versus a final evaluation test (single objective exam). The statistical analysis of the data during the last five academic years reveals that the portfolio evaluation is less correlated with the final grade of the subject obtained by the students, showing overrated marks with narrow dispersions. On the contrary, the final exam evaluation exhibits a higher correlation with the final grades, presenting a more representative distribution. The evaluation based in a final test is found to be more significant, unbiased, more coherent and able to reduce the subjectivity observed in previous years with the reportsbased evaluation.