¿Podemos confiar en la tecnología?Una reflexión sobre la crítica social en el mundo tecnológico

  1. José Antonio López Cerezo
Aldizkaria:
Argumentos de razón técnica: Revista española de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, y filosofía de la tecnología

ISSN: 1139-3327

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakia: 23

Orrialdeak: 13-36

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.12795/ARGUMENTOS/2020.I23.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Argumentos de razón técnica: Revista española de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad, y filosofía de la tecnología

Laburpena

In this paper we will try an exploratory reflection on the meaning of trust in technology and the value of critical skepticism in today's technological world. After examining the meaning of the notions of trust and dependence, and based on the contributions of various authors among which U. Beck and P. Sztompka stand out, we will argue that the increasing artificialization and depersonalization of our milieu is inducing a transition from confidence to dependence on the foundations of the social fabric. Finally, the value of personal skepticism and social criticism will be defended in response to the growing technological alienation in today's world.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aristóteles, On Rethoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, G.A. Kennedy (traducc.), 2ª ed., Nueva York-Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • Ballard, J.G., Rascacielos, Madrid, Alianza, 2018 (ed. orig. 1975). Basalla, G., The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • Bauer, M.W., R. Shukla y N. Allum (eds.), The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science Across the Globe, Nueva York, Routledge, 2012.
  • Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Londres, Sage, 1992 (ed. orig. 1986).
  • Bellow, B., “Who Earns the Trust in Citizens and Why: Experiences from the Private Sector”, en: OECD, Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, Paris, OCDE Publishing, 2017.
  • Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes y Trevor Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1989 (ed. orig. 1987).
  • Blackburn, S., “Trust, Cooperation, and Human Psychology”, en: V. Braithwaite y M. Levi (eds.), Trust and Governance, Nueva York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1998.
  • Callon, M. (1986), "The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle", en: M. Callon, J. Law y A. Rip (eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1986.
  • Darwall, S., “Trust as a Second-Personal Attitude (of the Heart)”, en: P. Faulkner y T. Simpson (eds.), The Philosophy of Trust, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Durkheim, E., La división del trabajo social, Madrid, Akal, 1987 (ed. orig. 1893).
  • Earle, T.C. y G. Cvetkovich, Social Trust: Towards a Cosmopolitan Society, Westport, Praeger, 1995.
  • Ellul, J., The Technological Society, Nueva York, Vintage, 1964 (ed. orig. 1954).
  • FECYT-OEI-RICYT, Cultura científica en Iberoamérica. Encuesta en grandes núcleos urbanos, Madrid, FECYT, 2009. En: https://icono.fecyt.es/sites/default/files/filepublicaciones/culturacie ntificaeniberoamerica.pdf (acceso: 19/06/2020).
  • Fundación BBVA, Estudio internacional de valores, Madrid, Fundación BBVA, 2019. En: https://www.fbbva.es/wpcontent/uploads/2019/09/Presentacion_Estudio_Valores_2019.pdf (acceso: 19/06/2020).
  • Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, Polity Press, 1997.
  • Hughes, T.P., Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.
  • Hupcey, J.E., J. Penrod, J.M. Morse & C. Mitcham, “An Exploration and Advancement of the Concept of Trust”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 3/2 (2001): 282-293.
  • Illich, I., La convivencialidad, Barcelona, Barral, 1974 (ed. orig. 1973).
  • Ipsos MORI, Public Attitudes to Science 2014, 2014. En: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/migrations/enuk/files/Assets/Docs/Polls/pas-2014-main-report.pdf (acceso: 19/06/2020).
  • Kasperson, R., “The Social Amplification of Risk: Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework of Risk”, en: S. Krimsky y D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, Praeger, 1992.
  • Krakauer, J., Into the Wild, Nueva York, Random House, 1996.
  • Löfstedt, R.E., Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies, Londres, Earthscan 2009.
  • López Cerezo, J.A., La confianza en la sociedad del riesgo, Barcelona, Sello Editorial, 2018.
  • López Cerezo, J.A. y B. Laspra, “The Culture of Risk: STS Citizens Facing the Challenge of Engagement”, en: B. Laspra y J.A. López Cerezo (eds.), Spanish Philosophy of Technology, Dordrecht, Springer, 2018.
  • Luhmann, N., Trust and Power, Nueva York, Riley, 1979.
  • Marcos, A., “Silencio tecnológico”, Scio: Revista de Filosofía, 15 (2008): 157-176.
  • Marcuse, H., One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Londres-Nueva York, Routledge, 1964.
  • Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis y F.D. Schoorman, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, Academy of Management Review, 20/3 (1995): 709-734.
  • McCraw, B.W., “The Nature of Epistemic Trust”, Social Epistemology, 29/4 (2015): 413-430.
  • Mill, J. S., Sobre la libertad, Madrid, Alianza, 1981 (ed. orig. 1859).
  • Mumford, L., The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power, Nueva York, Harcourt, 1970.
  • OCDE, Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust, París, OECD Publishing, 2017.
  • O’Neil, C., “Betraying Trust”, en: P. Faulkner y T. Simpson (eds.), The Philosophy of Trust, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Ortega y Gasset, J., Meditación de la Técnica, Madrid, Revista de Occidente, 1939.
  • Ortega y Gasset, J., “El mito del hombre allende la técnica”, conferencia en Darmstadt 1951, en: J.A. López Cerezo y J.L. Luján López (eds.), Filosofía de la tecnología, número monográfico de Teorema XVII/3, 1998.
  • Phillips, A., Journalism in Context: Practice and Theory for the Digital Age, Londres-Nueva York, Routledge, 2015.
  • Pirsig, R., Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Londres, Corgi Books, 1976 (ed. orig. 1974).
  • Quintanilla, M.A., “Engaging Technologies: Criteria for an Alternative Model of Technological Development”, en: B. Laspra y J.A. López Cerezo (eds.), Spanish Philosophy of Technology, Dordrecht, Springer, 2018.
  • Quintanilla, M.A., M. Parselis, D. Sandrone y D. Lawler, Tecnologías entrañables: ¿es posible un modelo alternativo de desarrollo tecnológico?, Madrid, Libros de la Catarata, 2017.
  • Renn, O., Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Londres, Earthscan, 2008.
  • Rousseau, D.M., S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt y C. Camerer, “Not So Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust”, The Academy of Management Review, 22/3 (1998): 393-404.
  • Sandman, P., Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication, Falls Curch VA, American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1993.
  • Siegrist, M., H. Gutsche y C. Keller,”Trust and Confidence in Crisis Communication: Three Case Studies”, en: M. Siegrist, T.C. Earle y H. Gutsche (eds.), Trust in Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind, Londres-Washington DC, Earthscan, 2007.
  • Stern, R., “’Trust is Basic’: Løgstrup on the Priority of Trust”, en: P. Faulkner y T. Simpson (eds.), The Philosophy of Trust, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Sztompka, P., Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Walaski, P., Risks and Crisis Communication: Methods and Messages, New Jersey, Wiley, 2011.
  • Warren, M.E., “Trust and Democracy”, en: E. M. Uslaner (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • Weber, L. y A. Carter, The Social Construction of Trust, Nueva York, Springer, 2003.
  • Zagzebski, L.T., Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet