Niveles de uso y aceptación de los dispositivos móviles en el aula

  1. Javier Fombona Cadavieco 1
  2. Francisco Javier Rodil Pérez 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Consejería de Educación del Principado de Asturias (España)
Journal:
Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

ISSN: 1133-8482

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 52

Pages: 21-35

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Pixel-Bit: Revista de medios y educación

Abstract

New portable digital instruments are accessing daily and professionally life of all citizens.This high level of penetration of mobile digital devices for computing and informationmanagement takes any time and place, and the school should implement this potential notonly in the field of communication, but also for oriented activities to the construction ofknowledge. This paper analyzes the real actual implementation and acceptance at differenteducational levels in the secondary schools as reference in Spain. The research found thatteachers and students have these mobile devices, but half recognizes that never used as ateaching tool. And half of teachers doubt it can improve the traditional educationalmethodology, although most would like to implement and believe it would be a motivatingfactor for students. On the other hand, students show more interest and believe it wouldimprove their performance.

Bibliographic References

  • Al-Emran, M.; Elsherif, H.M. & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033
  • Alrasheedi, M., Capretz, L. & Raza, A. (2016). Management’s Perspective on Critical Success Factors Affecting Mobile Learning in Higher Education Institutions. An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(2), 253-274. DOI: 10.1177/0735633115620387
  • Alzahrani, H. (2015). Examining the Effectiveness of Utilizing Mobile Technology in Vocabulary Development for Language Learners. Arab World English Journal, 6(3), 108-119.
  • Barbosa, J.L., Barbosa, D.N. & Wagner, A. (2012). Learning in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(3), 64-77. DOI: 10.4018/jicte.2012070108
  • Bernstein, I.H., Garbin, C. & Teng, G. (1988). Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York, NY: SpringerVerlag.
  • Bonett D. G. & Price R. M. (2005). Inferential methods for the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. J. Educ. Behav. Stat., (30), 213–225. DOI: 10.3102/10769986030002213
  • Buckingham, S. & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social Learning Analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3-26.
  • Buendía, L., Colás, P. & Hernández, F. (1997). Métodos de investigación en Psicopedagogía. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Cabero, J. (2006). Bases Psicopedagógicas del e-learning. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 3(1). Recuperado de http://www.uoc.edu/rusc/3/1/dt/esp/cabero.html
  • Camacho, M. & Lara, T. (2011). M-learning en España, Portugal y América Latina. Salamanca: Observatorio de la formación en red Scopeo. Recuperado de scopeo.usal.es/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/scopeom003.pdf.
  • Castillo-Manzano, J.; Castro-Nuno, M.; Lopez-Valpuesta, L.; Sanz-Diaz, M.T. & Yniguez, R. (2017). To take or not to take the laptop or tablet to classes, that is the question. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 326-333, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.017
  • Castro, G.G., Domínguez, E. L., Velázquez, Y. H., Matla, M. Y. R., Toledo, C. B. E. & Hernández, S. E. P. (2016). MobiLearn: Context-Aware Mobile Learning System. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 14(2), 958-964. DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7437246
  • Ericsson Mobility Report (2015). On the pulse of the networked society. Londres: Ericsson.
  • Escalera, D. (2010). Recurso tecnológico para el aprendizaje móvil (m-learning). Journal Boliviano de Ciencias, 7(21), 5-7.
  • Fombona, J., Goulao, M. F. & García, M. (2014). Improving attractiveness of the information by using the augmented reality. Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informaçao, 19(1), 37-50. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-99362014000100004
  • Fombona, J. & Pascual, M. A. (2013). Beneficios del m-learning en la Educación Superior. Educatio Siglo XXI, 31 (2), 211-234.
  • Fombona, J., Pascual, A. & Amador, F. (2012). Realidad Aumentada, una evolución de las aplicaciones de los dispositivos móviles. PixelBit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 41, 197-210.
  • Fundación Telefónica & Fundación Itinerarium (2014). Mi móvil al servicio de la comunidad: aprender y compartir. EMA Univ. Barcelona. Recuperado de http://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/publicaciones-listado/pagina-item-publicaciones/?itempubli=268&_ga=1.12140404.1 751910071.1445584440
  • Gómez, P. & Monge, C. (2013). Potencialidades del teléfono móvil como recurso innovador en el aula: una revisión teórica. Revista Didáctica, Innovación y Multimedia, 26, 1-16.
  • Herrera, S. & Fennema, M. (2011). Tecnologías móviles aplicadas a la educación superior. En AA.VV, Actas del XVII Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación, 620-630.
  • Huang, Y.M.; Chiu, P.S.; Liu, T.C.; Chen, T.S. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning, Computers & Education, 57(4), 2291-2302, DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.023
  • Huang, Y.M. & Wu, T.T. (2011). A Systematic Approach for Learner Group Composition Utilizing U-Learning Portfolio. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 102-117
  • Keengwe, J. (2014). Promoting active learning through the integration of mobile and ubiquitous technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Martin. F. & Ertzberger, J. (2010). Algo más que un celular: notas sobre el papel de la telefonía móvil en la vida de adolescentes de Santiago (Chile). Periferia 13. Barcelona: UAB.
  • McLeod, L.D., Swygert, K.A. & Thissen, D. (2001). Factor analysis for items scored in two categories. En D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.). Test scoring (pp. 189-216). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nunnaly, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ogata, H., Houb, B., Li, M., Uosakic, N., Mouri, K. & Liu, S. (2014). Ubiquitous Learning Project Using Life-logging Technology in Japan. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 85-100.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1-6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Reychav, I., Dunaway, M. & Kobayashi, M. (2015). Understanding mobile technology-fit behaviors outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 87, 142-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.005
  • Sabah, N.M. (2016). Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption, Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 522-533, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009
  • Salah, A.S. & Sameer, A.B. (2015). Mobile Learning: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 114(11), 1-5.
  • Sevillano, Mª. L. & Vázquez, E. (2015). Modelos de investigación en contextos ubicuos y móviles en Educación Superior. Madrid: McGrawHill.
  • Sharples, M. (2003). Disruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning. International Journal or Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 12 (5/6), 504-520. DOI: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2002.002148
  • Shuler, C., Winters, N. & West, W. (2013). El futuro del aprendizaje móvil. Implicaciones para la planificación y la formulación de políticas. Francia: UNESCO.
  • Spitzer, M. (2015). M-Learning? When it comes to learning, smartphones are a liability, not an asset. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(4), 87-91.
  • Steven, V. (2013). Aprendizaje móvil y políticas. Cuestiones clave. Francia: UNESCO.
  • Stevens, D. & Kitchenham, A. (2011). An analysis of mobile learning in education, business and medicine. En Kitchenham (Ed.), Models for interdisciplinary mobile learning: Delivering information to students (pp. 1–25). Hershey, P.A.: IGI Publication.
  • UNESCO (2013). UNESCO Policy Guidelines for Mobile Learning. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • Vázquez, E. & Sevillano, M. (2015). Dispositivos digitales móviles en educación. El aprendizaje ubicuo. Madrid: Narcea.
  • Wampler, P.J., Rediske, R.R. & Molla, A.R. (2013). Using ArcMap, Google Earth, and Global Positioning Systems to select and locate random households in rural Haiti. International Journal of Health Geographics, 12(3). DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-3.
  • West, M. (2012). Activando el aprendizaje móvil. Temas globales. Francia: UNESCO.
  • Yeap, J.A.L.; Ramayah, T. & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education. Electronic Markets, 26(4), 323-338, DOI: 10.1007/s12525-015-0214-x
  • Yoiro, P. & Feifei, Y. (2012). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Service-Learning on the Social, Personal, and Cognitive Outcomes of Learning. Learning & Education, 11, 9-27. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2010.0072
  • Yot, C.R. & Marcelo, C. (2015). Does the m-learning take off? Analysis of users’ disposition and habits. PIXEL-BIT- Revista de Medios y Educación, 46, 205-218. DOI: 10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i46.13
Data source: Dialnet