Una defensa de las axiologías centradas en el sufrimiento

Bibliographic References

• Algander, P., “A Defence of the Asymmetry in Population Ethics”, Res Publica, 18 (2), 2012, pp. 145-157.
• Amris, K. et al., “Pain from Torture: Assessment and Management”, Pain Reports, 4 (6), 2019, e794.
• Animal Ethics, Introduction to Wild Animal Suffering: A Guide to the Issues, Oakland, Animal Ethics, 2020, https://www.animal-ethics.org/introduction-to-wild-animal-suffering/ (consultado el 7-9-2020).
• Bastardi, A. et al., “Wishful Thinking: Belief, Desire, and the Motivated Evaluation of Scientific Evidence”, Psychological Science, 22 (6), 2011, pp. 731-732.
• Baumeister, R.F. et al., “Bad is Stronger than Good”,Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), 2001, pp. 323-370.
• Benatar, D., Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence, Oxford, New York, Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, 2006.
• Birnie, K.A., et al., “Recommendations for Selection of Self-Report Pain Intensity Measures in Children and adolescents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Measurement Properties”, PAIN, 160 (1), 2019, pp. 5-18.
• Chanques, G. et al., “The Measurement of Pain in Intensive Care Unit: Comparison of 5 Self-Report Intensity Scales”, PAIN®,151 (3), 2010, pp. 711-721.
• Derbyshire, S.W.G., “Pain and the Dangers of Objectivity”, en S.W.G. Derbyshire (ed.), Meanings of Pain, Cham, Springer, 2016, pp. 23-36.
• Diener, E. et al., “Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill: Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being”, American Psychologist, 61, 2006, pp. 103-118.
• Elstein, D. J., “The Asymmetry of Creating and Not Creating Life”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 39 (1), 2005, pp. 49-59.
• FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, “Livestock primary”, FAO Statistical Database, 2020, http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/default.aspx#ancor (consultado el 1-6-2020).
• Faria, C. y Paez, E., “Animals in Need: The Problem of Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature”, Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 3, 2015, pp. 7-13.
• Faria, C. et al., Animal Ethics Goes Wild: The Problem of Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature (tesis doctoral), Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2016.
• Frick, J. D., ‘Making People Happy, Not Making Happy People’: A Defense of the Asymmetry Intuition in Population Ethics (tesis doctoral), Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University, 2014.
• Future of Life Institute, “The Future of AI – What Do You Think?”, Future of Life Institute, 2017 futureoflife.org/superintelligence-survey/ (consultado el 18-5-2020).
• Gardner, M., “A Harm-Based Solution to the Non-Identity Problem”, Ergo, 2, 2015a, pp. 427-444.
• Gardner, M., “On the Strength of the Reason Against Harming”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2015b, pp. 1-15.
• Giordano, J. et al., “Pain Assessment: Subjectivity, Objectivity, and the Use of Neurotechnology Part One: Practical and Ethical Issues”, Pain Physician, 13 (4), 2010, pp. 305-315.
• Gloor, L., “Tranquilism”, Center on Long-Term Risk, 2017, https://longtermrisk.org/tranquilism (consultado el 7-2-2020).
• Gloor, L., “The Case for Suffering-Focused Ethics”, Center on Long-Term Risk, 2019, https://longtermrisk.org /the-case-for-suffering-focused-ethics (consultado el 3-3-2020).
• Grill, K., “Asymmetric Population Axiology: Deliberative Neutrality Delivered”, Philosophical Studies, 174 (1), 2017, pp. 219-236.
• Hjermstad, M., et al., “Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review”, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41 (6), 2011, pp. 1073-1093.
• Horta, O., “Animal Suffering in Nature: The Case for Intervention”, Environmental Ethics, 39 (3), 2017, pp. 261-279.
• Hurka, T., “Asymmetries in Value”, Noûs, 44, 2010, pp. 199-223.
• Jensen, M.P. y Karoly, P., “Self-Report Scales and Procedures for Assessing Pain in Adults”, en D.C. Turk y R. Melzack (eds.), Handbook of Pain Assessment, Nueva York, The Guilford Press, 2011, pp. 19-44.
• Mathison, E., Asymmetries and Ill-Being (tesis doctoral), Toronto, Ontario, University of Toronto, 2018.
• Mayerfeld, J., “The Moral Asymmetry of Happiness and Suffering”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 34 (3), 1996, pp. 317-338.
• Mayerfeld, J., Suffering and Moral Responsibility, New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999.
• Meacham, C.J.G., “Person-Affecting Views and Saturating Counterpart Relations”, Philosophical Studies, 158 (2), 2012, pp. 257-87.
• Minsky, M., The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2006.
• Mood, A. y Brooke, P., “Estimating the Number of Farmed Fish Killed in Global Aquaculture Each Year”, Fishcount, 2012, http://fishcount.org.uk/published/std/fishcountstudy2.pdf (consultado el 1-6-2020).
• Narveson, J., “Future People and Us”, en R.I. Sikora, y B. Barry (eds.), Obligations to Future Generations, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1978, pp. 38-60.
• Ord, T., “Moral Trade”, Ethics, 126, 2015, pp. 118-138.
• Ratnam, M.V.R.K. y Rao, D.B., Dukkha: Suffering in Early Buddhism, New Delhi, Discovery Publishing House, 2003. Roberts, M.A., “An Asymmetry in the Ethics of Procreation”, Philosophy Compass, 6 (11), 2011a, pp. 765-776.
• Roberts, M. A., “The Asymmetry: A Solution”, Theoria, 77 (4), 2011b, pp. 333-367.
• Rozin, P. y Royzman, E.B., “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (4), 2001, pp. 296-320.
• Ryder, R. D., “Painism: Ethics, Animal Rights and Environmentalism”, Global Bioethics, 5 (4), 1992, pp. 27-35.
• Ryder, R. D., “Painism: Some Moral Rules for the Civilized Experimenter”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1999 (8), pp. 35-42.
• Ryder, R. D., Painism: A Modern Morality, Open Gate Press, 2003.
• Ryder, R. D., “All Beings that Feel Pain Deserve Human Rights”, The Guardian, 2005, https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/aug/06/animalwelfare (consultado el 15-03-2021).
• Sánchez-Rodríguez, E. et al., “A Comparison of Four Self-Report Scales of Pain Intensity in 6-to 8-Year-Old Children”, PAIN®, 153 (8), 2012, pp. 1715-1719.
• Schopenhauer, A., Sobre la voluntad de la naturaleza, Madrid, Alianza, 1970.
• Schopenhauer, A., El amor, las mujeres y la muerte, Madrid, EDAF, 1989.
• Schopenhauer, A., Los designios del destino, Madrid, Tecnos, 1994.
• Schopenhauer, A., Una fantasía metafísica, Córdoba, Alción, 1995.
• Schopenhauer, A., Sobre el dolor del mundo, el suicidio y la voluntad de vivir, Madrid, Tecnos, 1999.
• Schopenhauer, A., El mundo como voluntad y representación, Madrid, Akal, 2005.
• Singer, P., Ética práctica, Barcelona, Ariel, 1991. Singer, P., Animal Liberation, London, Random House, 1995.
• Singer, P., The Life You Can Save. How to Do Your Part to End World Poverty, New York, Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2010.
• Smith, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1759.
• Steinbock, B. y McClamrock, R., “When is Birth Unfair to the Child?”, Hastings Center Report, 24, 1994, pp. 15-21.
• Thong, I.S.K. et al., “The Validity of Pain Intensity Measures: What Do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R Measure?”, Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 18 (1), 2018, pp. 99-107.
• Tomasik, B., “The Importance of Wild-Animal Suffering”, Relations: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 3, 2015, pp. 133-152.
• Tooley, M., “Value, Obligation and the Asymmetry Question”, Bioethics, 12 (2), 1998, pp. 111-124.
• Unger, P., Living High and Letting Die. Our Illusion of Innocence, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.
• Vinding, M., Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications, Copenhagen, Ratio Ethica, 2020.