El Bienestar Ocupacionaldelimitación conceptual y variables clave de su desarrollo

  1. David Luque Balbona 1
  2. Sergio González Begega 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
RES. Revista Española de Sociología

ISSN: 2445-0367,  1578-2824

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Páginas: 307-324

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.22325/FES/RES.2020.17 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: RES. Revista Española de Sociología

Resumen

El artículo aborda dos aspectos clave para el estudio del bienestar ocupacional (BO): por un lado, su delimitación conceptual; y por otro, las principales variables explicativas de su desarrollo. En primer lugar, se explora el concepto de BO, indicando brevemente sus interacciones con otras fuentes de provisión de bienestar. Asimismo, se examinan de forma comparada cuatro elaboraciones conceptuales de BO, indicándose sus principales diferencias y sus solapamientos. En segundo lugar, se efectúa una síntesis de los principales resultados de la literatura internacional, con el doble objetivo de precisar y actualizar la situación comparada de España dentro del contexto europeo, así como de detectar las principales variables explicativas del desarrollo del BO. El artículo ofrece una contribución a la nueva agenda de investigación sobre bienestar que concibe la arquitectura de los sistemas de protección social post-industriales como el resultado dinámico de la combinación de diferentes fuentes de bienestar.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ascoli, U., Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2018). Still a weak occupational welfare in Southern Europe? Evidence from the Italian case. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 534-548.
  • Blank, F. (2018). With or without you – Occupational welfare and public social policy in Germany. En D. Natali, E. Pavolini, E. (Eds.), Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (103-123). Bruselas: ETUI.
  • Bravo Fernández, C., de Lara Guarch, A. (2018), La previsión social complementaria en España: Estado de situación y expectativas ¿infundadas? Actuarios, 42, 34-40.
  • Brunsdon, E., May, M. (2007). Occupational welfare. En M. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, (149-176). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Deacon, A. (1993). Richard Timuss: 20 years on. Journal of Social Policy, 22 (2), 235-242.
  • Deacon, A. (2002). Perspectives on Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Dixon, J., Hyde, M. (2003). Welfare retrenchment or social citizenship? Ideology and the privatization of social protection. International Journal of Social Economics, 30 (5), 633-650.
  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2011a). The Varieties of Pension Governance. Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ebbinghaus, B. (2011b). The role of trade unions in European pension reforms: From ‘old’to ‘new’politics? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 315-331.
  • Ebbinghaus, B., Manow, P. (2001). Introduction: studying varieties of welfare capitalism. En B. Ebbinghaus, P. Manow (Eds.), Comparing Welfare Capitalism (pp. 1-24). London: Routledge.
  • Farnsworth, K. (2012). Social versus Corporate Welfare. Houndmills: Palgrave.
  • Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gal, J., Bargal, D. (2002). Critical junctures, labor movements and the development of occupational welfare in Israel, Social Problems, 49(3), 432-454.
  • Goodin, R., Rein, M. (2001). Regime on pillars. Alternative welfare state logics and dynamics. Public Administration, 79 (4), 769-801.
  • Greve, B. (1994). The hidden Welfare State. Scandinavian Journal of Social Policy, 4, 203-211.
  • Greve, B. (2007). Occupational welfare: winners and losers. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Greve, B. (2008). What is Welfare? Central European Journal of Public Policy, 2 (1), 50-73.
  • Grødem, A. S., Hagelund, A., Hippe, J. M., Trampusch, C. (2018). Beyond coverage: the politics of occupational pensions and the role of trade unions. Introduction to special issue. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 9-23
  • Hemericjk, A. (2015). European welfare states in motion. En J. Magone (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of European Politics (pp. 611-640). London: Routledge.
  • Hoven, F.H. (1982). Regressive Welfare. Distribution Effects of Occupational Welfare Benefits. Acta Sociologica, 25(1), 65–73.
  • Howard, C. (1998). The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the US. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hyde, M., Dixon, J. (2001). Welfare ideology, the market and social security: towards a typology of market oriented reform. En J. Dixon, M. Hyde (Eds), The Marketisation of Social Security, (pp. 1-26). Wesport CT: Greenwood.
  • Jessoula, M. (2018). Pension multi-pillarisation in Italy: actors,‘institutional gates’ and the ‘new politics’ of funded pensions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 73-89.
  • Johnston, A., Kornelakis, A., d’Acri, C. R. (2011). Social partners and the welfare state: Recalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(4), 349-364.
  • Keune, M. (2018). Opportunity or threat? How trade union power and preferences shape occupational pensions. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 463-476.
  • Mapelli, L. (2017). The development and determinants of ‘occupational welfare’ in the recalibration of European welfare regimes: a comparative perspective. Working Paper 2WEL 1/2017, Torino/Brussels, Centro Einaudi and European Social Observatory, November, 29p.
  • Mares, I. (2003). The Politics of Social Risk. Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martínez Poza, A. (2018). Protecting occupational pensions and unemployment benefits in Spain: a weak Occupational Welfare system. En D. Natali, E. Pavolini (Coord.) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (193-213). Bruselas: ETUI.
  • May, M., Brunsdon, E. (1994). Workplace care in the mixed economy of welfare. Social Policy Review, 6, 146-169.
  • May, M., Brunsdon, E. (1999). Commercial and occupational welfare. En R.M. Page, R. Silburn (Eds.), British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century (pp. 271-298). Houndsmills: MacMillan.
  • Murlis, H. (1974). Employee Benefits Today. London: British Institute of Management.
  • Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2018). Occupational Welfare in Europe: state of play, determinants and policy implications. En D. Natali et al. (Eds.) Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (239-257). Bruselas, ETUI.
  • Natali, D., Keune, M., Pavolini, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). Sixty years after Titmuss: New findings on occupational welfare in Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 435-448.
  • Natali, D., Pavolini, E. (2014). Comparing (Voluntary) Occupational Welfare in the EU: Evidence from an international research study. OSE Research Paper 16, November.
  • Pavolini, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). Comparing occupational welfare in Europe: the case of occupational pensions. Social Policy and Administration, 52 (2), 477-490.
  • Pérez-Bedmar, M. de S.; Suárez Corujo, B., de la Puebla Pinilla, A. (2006). La protección social complementaria en la negociación colectiva. En R. Escudero Rodríguez (Coord.), La negociación colectiva en España: una mirada crítica (pp. 487-509). Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
  • Shalev, M. (ed.) (1996). The privatization of social policy? Occupational welfare and the welfare state in America, Scandinavia and Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sinfield, A. (1978). Analysis in the social division of welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 7(2), 129-156.
  • Titmuss, R. (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Trampusch, C. (2007). Industrial relations as a source of social policy: A typology of the institutional conditions for industrial agreements on social benefits. Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), 251-270
  • Trampusch, C. (2013). Employers and collectively negotiated occupational pensions in Sweden, Denmark and Norway: promoters, vacillators and adversaries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19 (1), 37-53.
  • Waine, T.C.B. (2001). Social insecurity and the retreat from social democracy: occupational welfare in the long boom and financialization. Review of International Political Economy, 8(1), 96-118.
  • Welshman, J. (2004). The unknown Titmuss. Journal of Social Policy, 33 (2), 225-247.
  • Wiß, T. (2018). Divergent occupational pensions in Bismarckian countries: the case of Germany and Austria. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 91-107.
  • Yerkes, M., Tijdens, K. (2010). Social risks protection on collective agreements: evidence for Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(4), 369-383.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet