Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Evaluación del Conocimiento sobre Estrategias de Autorregulación en universitarios (CEA-U)

  1. Pedro Rosário 1
  2. José Carlos Núñez 2
  3. Rebeca Cerezo 2
  4. Estrella Fernández 2
  5. Paula Solano 2
  6. Natalia Amieiro 2
  1. 1 Universidad do Minho
  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Revista de Psicología y Educación

ISSN: 1699-9517

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 144-156

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.23923/RPYE2019.02.179 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Psicología y Educación

Resumen

Se dispone de suficientes instrumentos de evaluación sobre el uso de estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado por parte de los estudiantes de las diferentes etapas educativas. Sin embargo, no existen instrumentos fiables y válidos que aporten información sobre el grado de conocimiento del estudiante sobre lo que implica un comportamiento autorregulado a la hora de aprender, a pesar de que el nivel del conocimiento previo es un determinante importante de la conducta posterior. Por ello, el objetivo de este estudio fue el análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Conocimiento Autorregulatorio (CEA) en estudiantes universitarios (CEA-U). En base a un diseño de medidas repetidas (dos medidas con un intervalo temporal de seis meses) se ha aplicado el instrumento de evaluación a una amplia muestra de estudiantes de las titulaciones de psicología y educación. La validez y la fiabilidad de la escala se estudió por una doble vía: la validez estructural y la predictiva; así como la fiabilidad por consistencia interna y test-retest. Los resultados obtenidos muestran al CEA-U como un instrumento válido y fiable para su utilización con estudiantes universitarios.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allgood, W. P., Risko, V. J., Álvarez, M. C. & Fairbanks, M. M. (2000). Factors that influence study. En R. F. Flippo y D. C. Caverly (Coord.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research, (pp. 201-219). NJ: LEA.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos 22.0 User´s Guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An genetic perspective. American Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev. psych.52.1.1
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. Doi: 10.1037/00332909.107.2.238
  • Biggs, J. (2001). “The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning”. Higher Education, 42, 221-237. doi.org/10.1080/0260293960210101
  • Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Selfregulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199-231. doi.org/10.1111/j.14640597.2005.00205.x
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0047.2004.00316.x
  • Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15, 201-223. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.003
  • Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Amieiro, N., Valle, A., Rosário, P., & Núñez, J. C. (2019). Mediating role of self-efficacy and usefulness between self-regulated learning strategy knowledge and its use. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24 (1), 1-8.
  • Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students´ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42-54. doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006
  • Cheung, C. K. & Kwok, S. T. (1998). Activities and academic achievement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159 (2), 147 – 162. doi: 10.1080/00221329809596142
  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Selfregulation empowerment program: A schoolbased program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537-550. doi: 10.12691/education-2-11A-2
  • Dignath, Ch., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How Can Primary School Students Learn Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Most Effectively? A Meta-Analysis on SelfRegulation Training Programmes. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 101-129.
  • Entwistle, N., & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 258 – 265. doi: doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988. tb00901.x
  • Garavalia, L. S. & Gredler, M. E. (2002). Prior achievement aptitude and use of learning strategies as predictors of college student achievement. College Student Journal, 36, 616-626. doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-775
  • González, J. & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.) (2003). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Informe final. Fase Uno. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1983). LISREL 6 User’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
  • Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486-512. doi:10.12691/education-1-3-4
  • Nota, L., Soresi, S. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Self-regulation and academia and resilience: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198-251.
  • Núñez, J. C., Amieiro, N., Álvarez, D., García, T., & Dobarro, A. (2015). Escala de Evaluación de la Autorregulación del Aprendizaje a partir de Textos (ARATEX-R). European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 9-22.
  • Núñez, J. C., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J. A., Rosário, P., Valle, A., Fernández, E., & Suárez, N. (2011). Implementation of training programs in self-regulated learning strategies in Moodle format: Results of an experience in higher education. Psicothema, 23, 274-281.
  • Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Solano, P. & Rosário, P. (2006). Evaluación de los procesos de autorregulación mediante autoinforme. Psicothema, 18, 353-358.
  • Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 78-90. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2309
  • Pike, G. R. & Kuh, G. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46, 185-209. doi:10.1007/s 11162–004–1599–0
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self – regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self–regulation, (pp. 452-502). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407. doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  • Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L. & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96-116. doi. org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001
  • Rosário, P., González-Pienda, J. A., Pinto, R., Ferreira, P., Lourenço, A. & Paiva, O. (2010). Efficacy of the program “Testas’s (mis)adventures” to promote the deep approach to learning. Psicothema, 22, 828-834.
  • Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Nuñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Solano, P., & Valle, A. (2007). Evaluating the efficacy of a program to enhance college students´ self-regulation learning processes and learning strategies. Psicothema, 19, 422-427.
  • Rosário, P., Mourao, R., Soares, S., Chaleta, E., Grácio, L., Simoes, F., Núñez, J. C., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2005). Trabalho de casa, tarefas escolares, auto-regulaçao e envolvimento parental. Psicología em Estudo, 10, 343-351.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Valle, A., Trigo, L., & Guimarães, C. (2010). Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: A narrative-based program assessed in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 411-428.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J.A., Almeida, L., Soares, S. & Rubio, M. (2005). El aprendizaje escolar examinado desde la perspectiva del «Modelo 3P» de J. Biggs. Psicothema, 17, 20-30.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Valle, A., GonzálezPienda, J. A., & Lourenço, A. (2013). Grade level, study time, and grade retention and their effects on motivation, self-regulated learning strategies, and mathematics achievement: a structural equation model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 1311-1331. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0167-9
  • Tuckman, B. W. (2003). The effect of learning and motivation strategies training on college students’ achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 430-437. doi.org/10.1353/csd.2003.0034
  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regulation intervention with a focus on learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727-747). New York, San Diego: Academic press.
  • Williams, J.E. & Hellman, C.M. (1998). Investigating self-regulated learning among first-generation community college students. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 5, 83-87.
  • Williams, P. E. & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first-and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45, 71 – 82.
  • Winne, P. H. & Jamieson–Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of selfreports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551–572. doi.org/10.1016/S0361476X(02)00006-1
  • Winne, P. H. & Jamieson–Noel, D. (2003). Self– regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259–276. doi.org/10.1016/S0361476X(02)00041-3
  • Winne, P. H. & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self – regulation (pp. 531 – 566). NY.: Academic Press.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205. doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-Regulated learning. From teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp.1-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a selfregulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. doi.org/10.1207/ s15430421tip4102_2
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating selfregulation and motivation: Historical, background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. doi. org/10.3102/0002831207312909
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49-65). NY: Routledge.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862. doi. org/10.2307/1163397
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet