¿Divulgan las organizaciones con desarrollos open source su impacto social?un análisis webmétrico

  1. Jesús García García 1
  2. María Isabel Alonso de Magdaleno 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
GCG: revista de globalización, competitividad y gobernabilidad

ISSN: 1988-7116

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Pages: 29-45

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: GCG: revista de globalización, competitividad y gobernabilidad

Abstract

Open source describes a methodology in software development that promote access to the source code. This model has resulted in a large and efficient ecosystem of software innovation, freely available to society and has reduced software to raw infrastructure commodity while promoting creation of value to a later stage of the value chain. The objective of our research is to identify indicators in order to measure and communicate open source social responsibility. To reach our goal we conduct a webmetric study, where several successful open source projects are analyzed for success indicators disclosure.

Bibliographic References

  • Benkler, Y. (2002), “Coase’s penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, Num. 3, pp. 369-446.
  • Christensen, C. M.; Raynor, M. E. (2003), “The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • García-García, J.; Alonso de Magdaleno, M. I. (2010), “Fair value on commons-based intellectual property assets. Lessons of an estimation over the Linux kernel”, en actas de “4th Floss International Workshop on Free / Libre / Open Source Software”, Universidad Friedrich-Schiller de Jena (Alemania).
  • Ghosh, R. A. (2006), “Economic impact of FLOSS on innovation and competitiveness of the EU ICT sector”, European Communities, Maastricht.
  • Global Reporting Initiative (2011), “Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Reporting Framework, G3.1, NGO Sector Supplement”, disponible en: http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/SectorSupplements/NGO/
  • Hardin, G. (1968), “The tragedy of the commons”, Science, Num. 162, pp. 1243–1248.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990), “Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action”, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Ostrom, E.; Bromley, D.W. (1992), The rudments of a theory of the origins, survival, and performance of Common-Property institutions. En “Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy”, pp. 293–318, ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.
  • Ostrom, E. (2005), “Understanding Institutional Diversity”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • Porter, M. E.; Kramer, M. R. (2011), “Creating shared value”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, Num. 1-2, pp. 62-77.
  • Raymond, E. S. (1999), “The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary”, O’Reilly Press, Cambridge, MA.
Data source: Dialnet