Multifactor implicit measures to assess enterprising personality dimensions

  1. Víctor Martínez-Loredo 1
  2. Marcelino Cuesta 1
  3. Luis Manuel Lozano 2
  4. Ignacio Pedrosa 3
  5. José Muñiz 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  3. 3 Parque Científi co Tecnológico (CTIC)
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Alea: 30

Zenbakia: 4

Orrialdeak: 357-363

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Psicothema

Laburpena

Antecedentes: se han propuesto múltiples medidas implícitas para superar las limitaciones de los autoinformes. El presente estudio tiene por objetivo desarrollar un nuevo test de asociación implícita (MFT-IAT) para evaluar rasgos asociados a la emprendeduría, explorar su fiabilidad y evidencias de validez. Método: se evaluaron 1.142 personas (edad media 42,36, DT = 13,17) sobre información demográfica, de empleo y personalidad usando la Batería para la Evaluación de la Personalidad Emprendedora (BEPE). Completaron una tarea MFT-IAT para evaluar los rasgos del BEPE (motivación de logro, autonomía, innovación, auto-eficacia, locus de control, optimismo, tolerancia al estrés y asunción de riesgos). Se estimó la fiabilidad mediante el alfa de Cronbach. Se realizaron Análisis Factoriales Exploratorios (AFEs) para evaluar la estructura interna del MFT-IAT y correlaciones y análisis de varianza para estimar las evidencias de validez en la relación con el empleo. Resultados: los AFEs ofrecieron evidencias de validez con alta consistencia interna (a = ,92-,93). Las correlaciones entre las medidas explícitas e implícitas fueron no significativas. Ninguna medida implícita mostró diferencias significativas entre los distintos estados laborales. Discusión: este es un estudio pionero en el cambio y se necesita más investigación para mejorar la viabilidad de las medidas implícitas en evaluaciones aplicadas.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

The present study was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Refs: PSI2014-56114-P and PSI2017-85724-P) and a predoctoral grant (Ref: BES-2015-073327). Both funding sources played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the results.

Finantzatzaile

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Almeida, P.I.L., Ahmetoglu, G., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). Who wants to be and entrepreneur? The relationship between vocational interests and individual differences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Career Assessment, 22, 102-112. doi: 10.1177/1069072713492923
  • Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380
  • Banse, R., Seise, J., & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift Fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 145-160. doi: 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.145
  • Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Burrows, C. N. (2015). Implications of the Implicit Association Test D-transformation for psychological assessment. Assessment, 22, 429-440. doi: 10.1177/1073191114551382
  • Brandstätter, H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 222230. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.007
  • Brunstein, J., & Schmitt, J.H. (2004). Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 536-555. doi: 10.1016/j. jrp.2004.01.003.
  • Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122. doi: 10.1037/a0021212
  • Cuesta, M., Suárez-Álvarez, J., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (in press). Assessment of eight entrepreneurial personality dimensions: Validity evidence of the BEPE battery. Frontiers in Psychology
  • de Cuyper, K., de Houwer, J., Vansteelandt, K., Perugini, M., Pieters, G., Claes, J., & Hermans, D. (2017). Using indirect measurement tasks to assess the self-concept of personality: A systematic review and metaanalyses. European Journal of Personality, 31(1), 8-41. doi: 10.1002/ per.2092
  • De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211
  • Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Takemura, K., Zhang, C. X. J., & Hsu, C. (2013). Are implicit self-esteem measures valid for assessing individual and cultural differences? Journal of Personality, 83(1), 56-68. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12082
  • Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
  • Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the ‘‘I’’, the ‘‘A’’, and the ‘‘T’’: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74-147. doi: 10.1080/10463280600681248
  • Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(3), 171-180. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.171
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2015). 2014 Global Report: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. Retrieved from www. gemconsortium.org/report.
  • Greenwald, A. G. (2005). Implicit Assessment of Multifactor Traits (“Multifactor Trait IAT”). Retrieved from http://faculty.washington. edu/agg/pdf/Multifactor%20IAT.Invention%20Description.1Aug06. pdf
  • Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022
  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
  • Grumm, M., & Collani, G. (2007). Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2205-2217. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.032
  • Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness and implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(3), 1369-1392. doi: 10.1037/a0035028
  • Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369-1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613
  • Hurst, E., & Pugsley, B. (2011). What do small businesses do? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 43(2), 73-118.
  • Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32. doi: 10.1037/00223514.91.1.16
  • Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A, & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & Schwarz, N. (Ed.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59-101). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Leutner, F., Ahmetoglu, G., Akhtar, R., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2014). The relationship between the entrepreneurial personality and the Big Five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 5863. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.042
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88-91. doi: 10.3758/BF03192753.
  • Muñiz, J., Pedrosa, I., García-Cueto, E., & Suárez-Álvarez, J. (2016). Enterprising personality. In V. S. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-5). Basel: Springer International Publishing.
  • Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2016). How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports. Psicothema, 28, 465-470.
  • Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., & Hawkins, C. B. (2010). Implicit political cognition. In B. Gawronski & Payne, B.K. (Ed.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 463488). New York: Guilford.
  • Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166-180. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418
  • Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund E., Silbereisen R. K., Gosling S. D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 104-122. doi: 10.1037/a0032275
  • Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2016). A computerized adaptive test for enterprising personality assessment in youth. Psicothema, 28, 471-478.
  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007a). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 353-385. doi: 10.1080/13594320701595438
  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007b). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, Frese, M. & Baron, R.J. (Ed.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Roberts, B.W., Kuncel, N.R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L.R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
  • Schmukle, S.C., & Egloff (2008). Validity of the five-factor model for the implicit self-concept of personality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 263-272. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.263
  • Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J. B., & Greenwald, A., G. (2008). Using implicit association tests for the assessment of implicit personality selfconcept. In G. J. Boyle, Matthews, G., & Saklofske, D. H. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment. Personality Measurement and Testing (Vol. 2, pp. 508-528). London: SAGE.
  • Siers, B. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2013). On the validity of implicit association measures of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.004
  • Slabbinck, H., van Witteloostuijn, A., Hermans, J., Vanderstraeten, J., Dejardin, M., Brassey, J., & Ramdani, D. (2018). The added value of implicit motives for management research development and first validation of a Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) for the measurement of implicit motives. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198094
  • Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The Brief Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283-294. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283
  • Steffens, M.C., & Schulze-König, S. (2006). Predicting spontaneous Big Five behavior with implicit association tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 13-20. doi: 10.1027/10155759.22.1.13
  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Refl ective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220-247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
  • Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Screening enterprising personality in youth: An empirical model. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1-9. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.61
  • Suslow, T., Lindner, C., Kugel, H., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S.C. (2014). Using implicit association tests for the assessment of implicit personality selfconcepts of extraversion and neuroticism in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 218, 272-276. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.023
  • Teachman, B. A., Cody, M. W., & Clerkin, E. M. (2010). Clinical applications of implicit aocial cognition theories and methods. In B. Gawronski & Payne, B.K. (Ed.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 463-488). New York: Guilford.
  • Timmerman, M.E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220. doi: 10.1037/a0023353.
  • Wiers, R. W., Houben, K., & de Kraker, J. (2007). Implicit cocaine associations in active cocaine users and controls. Addictive Behaviors, 32(6), 1284-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.07.009
  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126. doi: 10.1037/0033295X.107.1.101
Datuen iturria: Dialnet