MeLmodelo de adaptación dinámica del proceso de aprendizaje en eLearning

  1. Sánchez Santillán, Miguel 1
  2. Paule Ruiz, María Puerto 1
  3. Cerezo Menéndez, Rebeca 1
  4. Víctor Álvarez García
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728 1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 32

Número: 1

Páginas: 106-114

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

En nuestra vida diaria hemos integrado progresivamente el uso de Internet. Esta incorporación también se ha producido en todos los niveles educativos, donde los entornos virtuales de aprendizaje son el medio utilizado, por profesores, estudiantes e instituciones, para el manejo y la distribución de experiencias educativas. Sin embargo, tal y como están diseñados estos sistemas, hacen que los estudiantes tengan dificultades para desplegar sus habilidades metacognitivas, además de provocar una sobrecarga cognitiva debido a una mala organización de los contenidos y de la navegación. Es necesario, por tanto, incluir en las plataformas de aprendizaje un mecanismo que permita la adaptación de estos sistemas a las características, necesidades y contexto del estudiante con el objetivo de optimizar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. En este trabajo se describe un modelo de adaptación para Learning Management Systems (LMSs) que utilizando variables centrales en el proceso de aprendizaje permite aplicar reglas adaptativas a los distintos tipos de contenidos y conocimientos que se han de transmitir o adquirir. A nivel aplicado, el modelo obtenido permite desarrollar cursos adaptados que dan soporte y promueven el aprendizaje y la autorregulación dentro de los entornos de aprendizaje virtuales

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., y Stair, R. M. (2000). Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Com-puter Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), pp. 418–430. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
  • Akbulut, Y., y Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education, 58(2), 835 – 842. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008
  • Area-Moreira, M. (2000). What is the role of the Internet in the peda-gogical change at the level of College Education (Spanish). Proceedings of III International Conference of Communication, Technology and Education, pp. 128–135.
  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2
  • Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer
  • Azevedo, R., Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Harley, J., y Trevors, G. (2012). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in student-centered leaning environments. D. Jonassen & S. Land. Theoretical foundations of student-center learning environments, 171–197.
  • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., y Winters, F. I. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Testing and Assessment Modeling, 53, 106–140
  • Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., y Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 381–412. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
  • Azevedo, R., y Feyzi-Behnagh, R. (2011). Dysregulated Learning with Advanced Learning Technologies. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society-English Version, 7(2).
  • Azevedo, R. y Witherspoon, A. M. (2009). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia. En D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, editors, Handbook of metacognition in education, pp 319–339. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
  • Bouchet, JM Harley, GJ Trevors, & R Azevedo (2013). Clustering and Profiling Students According to their Interactions with an Intelligent Tutoring System Fostering Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 104-146.
  • Bra, P. D., y Calvi, L. (1998). AHA! An open Adaptive Hypermedia Architecture. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 4, pp. 115–139. doi:10.1080/13614569808914698
  • Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more myster- ious mechanisms. En F. Weinert & R. Kluwe, eds., Metacognition, Motivation, and Under- standing, (pp. 65–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2), 87–129. doi:10.1007/BF00143964
  • Butler, D. L., y Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
  • Cerezo, R., Álvarez, D., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Núñez, J.C. y Álvarez, L. (2013). Nuevas metodologías para la evaluación del aprendizaje en campus virtuales. En O. Arias-Gundín & R. Fidalgo (Eds.), Innovación Educativa en la Educación Superior (pp. 77-96). Saarbrücken: Lap Lamberte Academic Publishin GMBH & Co.
  • Cristea, A. I., y De Mooij, A. (2003). Adaptive course authoring: My Online Teacher. En 10th International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003. ICT 2003 (Vol. 2, pp. 1762 – 1769 vol.2).
  • Cristea, A., Smits, D., y Bra, P. de. (2007). Towards a generic adaptive hypermedia platform: a conversion case study. JoDI: Journal of Digital Information, 8(3), 1.
  • Cuesta, D. L., Ramos, A. C., y Pavlich-Mariscal, J. A. (2012). Adaptation and disability aspects in a virtual learning environment. Dyna, 79(173), 6-14.
  • Dagger, D., O’Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., y Wade, V. P. (2007). Service-Oriented E-Learning Platforms: From Monolithic Systems to Flexible Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(3), 28 –35. doi:10.1109/MIC.2007.70
  • Hauger, D., y Köck, M. (2007). State of the art of adaptivity in e-learning platforms. En Proceedings of the Workshop Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems (ABIS) (pp. 24–26).
  • Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. En Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2090116.2090118
  • Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Verbert, K., Nagel, T., Govaerts, S., Parra Chico, G. A., … Vandeputte, B. (2012, May). Learning dashboards & learnscapes.
  • García, V. M. Á., Ruiz, M. del P. P., Van Dort, R., y Pérez, J. R. P. (2010). RSS-Based Learning Using Audio. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 1(4), 76–87. doi:10.4018/jhcitp.2010100105
  • Gibson, C. C. (1998). The distance learner’s academic self-concept. En C.C. Gibson (Ed.) Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (p. 65-76). Madison, WI.: Atwood.
  • Glahn, C., Specht, M., y Koper, R. (2007). Smart Indicators on Learning Interactions. En E. Duval, R. Klamma, & M. Wolpers (Eds.), Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale (pp. 56–70). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Greene, J. A., Costa, L.-J., Robertson, J., Pan, Y., y Deekens, V. M. (2010). Exploring relations among college students’ prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1027–1043.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.013
  • Hsu, W. K., & Huang, S. S. (2006). Determinants of computer self-efficacy: An examination of learning motivation and learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(3), 245–265.
  • Jacobs, J. E., y Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255–278. doi:10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052
  • Johnson, R. D. (2005). An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy–performance relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 737–758.
  • Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I. y Ifenthale, D. (2014) Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323.
  • Lepper, M., y Wolverton, M. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. En J. Aranson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 135–158). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Matt, H. (2014). Creation of a Computer Self-Efficacy Measure: Analy-sis of Internal Consistency, Psychometric Properties, and Validity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0255.
  • McLoughlin, C. (2000). Beyond the halo effect: Investigating the quality of student learning online. Proceedings Moving Online Conference, School of Social Sciences, Southern Cross University.
  • Michaelides, D., Millard, D., Weal, M., y DeRoure, D. (2002). Auld Leaky: A Contextual Open Hypermedia Link Server. En S. Reich, M. Tzagarakis, & P. De Bra (Eds.), Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness, and Adaptivity (Vol. 2266, pp. 215–218). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
  • Moos, D. C., y Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hyper-media: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educa-tional Psychology, 33(2), 270–298. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001
  • Moos, D. C., y Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Literature Review of Computer Self-Efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576–600. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326083
  • Morueta, R. T., Rodríguez, M. A. P., y Gómez, J. I. A. (2011). Blended e-learning en universidades andaluzas. Aula abierta, 39(2), 47–58.
  • Nicol, D. J., y Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
  • Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35. 157-170. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
  • Pachnowski, L. M., y Jurczyk, J. P. (2000). Correlating self-directed learning with distance learning success. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association at Clearwater, FL.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., y McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Pintrich, Paul R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
  • Polson, M. C., y Richardson, J. J. (Eds.). (1988). Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Quintana, C., Zhang, M., y Krajcik, J. (2005). A Framework for Sup-porting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235–244. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
  • Rodríguez, S., G. Cabanach, R., Piñeiro, I., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., y González-Pienda, J. A. (2001). Metas de aproximación, metas de evitación y múltiples metas académicas. Psicothema, 13(Número 4), 546–550.
  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., y García, E. (2008). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers and Education, 51(1), 368–384.
  • Romero, Cristóbal, Ventura, S., Zafra, A., y Bra, P. de. (2009). Applying Web usage mining for personalizing hyperlinks in Web-based adaptive educational systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 828 – 840. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.003
  • Ruiz, M. del P. P., Díaz, M. J. F., Soler, F. O., y Pérez, J. R. P. (2008). Ad-aptation in current e-learning systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 30(1–2), 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2007.07.006
  • Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J.L., Butner y J. Heiner, C. (2011) Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: the importance of who, why and how. Education Technology Research Development, 59, 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6
  • Scheiter, K., y Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285–307. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
  • Schraw, G., y Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. doi:10.1007/BF02212307
  • Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. En Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 281–303). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.
  • Schunk, D. H., y Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
  • Shute, V.J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. En P. Durlach y Lesgold, A. M. (Eds.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 7-27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., y Páramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence: instructional implications. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43(3), 497–510.
  • Valle, A., Cabanach, R. G., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., Rodrí-guez, S., y Piñeiro, I. (2003). Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 71–87. doi:10.1348/000709903762869923
  • Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Cabanach, R. G., González-Pienda, J. A., Rodrí-guez, S., Rosário, P., y Cerezo, R. (2009). Academic goals and learning quality in higher education students. The Spanish journal of psychology, 12(1), 96–105.
  • Valle, A., Rodríguez, S., Cabanach, R. G., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., y Rosário, P. (2010). Motivational Profiles and Differences in Affective, Motivational and Achievement Variables. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 109–121.
  • Vargas, O. L., Martínez, C. H., y Uribe, Á. C. (2012). Logro de aprendi-zaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44(2), 13–26.
  • Yang, T. C., Hwang, G. J., y Yang, S. J. H. (2013). Development of an Adaptive Learning System with Multiple Perspectives based on Students? Learning Styles and Cognitive Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185-200.
  • Zimmerman, B. y Tsikalas, K. (2005). Computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self- regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267–271.