Estudio de la normatividad de los espacios informáticos académicos en Iberoamérica

  1. Fombona Cadavieco, Javier 1
  2. González Videgaray, MariCarmen 2
  3. Goulao, María de Fátima 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
    info

    Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

    Ciudad de México, México

    ROR https://ror.org/01tmp8f25

  3. 3 Universidade Aberta
    info

    Universidade Aberta

    Lisboa, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/02rv3w387

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

ISSN: 1135-9250

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 42

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.21556/EDUTEC.2012.42.343 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Edutec: Revista electrónica de tecnología educativa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Las instituciones educativas ofrecen aulas informáticas reguladas por normas. Su estudio ilustra sobre las características tecnológicas, las intenciones didácticas y el comportamiento de sus usuarios. Este trabajo analiza en profundidad un centenar de reglamentos en instituciones de diversos niveles educativos en países Iberoamericanos. Las normas se categorizaron y contrastaron, identificando aspectos prioritarios consensuados tales como la obligación de identificar al usuario, las prohibiciones de instalar software, comer en estos espacios o jugar en los equipos. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACIKALIN, M. (2010). Exemplary social studies teachers use of computer-supported instruction in the classroom. Turkish On line Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4); 66-82.
  • ANGUITA, M. Y ORDAX, E. (2000). Las alumnas ante los ordenadores; estrategias y formas de trabajo en el aula. Comunicar, 7(14); 218-224.
  • BENNETT, S., et al. (2008).The ‘digital natives’ debate; A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5); 775-786.
  • BISCOMB, K., DEVONPORT, T. Y LANE, A. (2008). Evaluating the use of computer-aided assessment in higher education. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport y Tourism Education, 7(1); 82-88.
  • BOWMAN, L., et al. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers y Education, 54(4); 927-931.
  • BOZIONELOS, N. (2004). Socio-economic background and computer use; the role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5); 725-746.
  • CARLSON, S. (2005). The next generation goes to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(7); A34.
  • COX, S., et al. (2005). Workplace surveillance and employee privacy; Implementing an effective computer use policy. Communications of the IIMA, 5(2); 57-65.
  • ELLIOTT, M. Y SCACCHI, W. (2005). Free software development; Cooperation and conflict in a virtual organizational culture. Disponible en http://www.ics.uci.edu/~wscacchi/Papers/New/Elliott-Scacchi-BookChapter.pdf (02-04-11).
  • FARAH, G. V. (2005). La resolución de problemas en matemática y el uso de las TIC: resultados de un estudio en colegios de Chile. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 19.
  • FLOWERS, B. Y RAKES, G. (2000). Analyses of acceptable use policies regarding the Internet in selected K-12 schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3); 351-365.
  • GARLAND, K. Y NOYES, J. (2004). The effects of mandatory and optional use on students' ratings of a computer-based learning package. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3); 263-273.
  • GIBERT, G. (2006). Diseño de un aula informática. Tesis doctoral. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Disponible en http://upcommons.upc.edu/pfc/bitstream/2099.1/2991/1/54684- 1.pdf (10-03-11).
  • GONZALEZ-VIDEGARAY, M., HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA, G. Y DEL-RIO-MARTINEZ, J. (2009). Learning objects in theory and practice: A vision from Mexican University teachers. Computers y Education, 53(4), 1330–1338.
  • GUTIÉRREZ, A., et al. (2010). Tribus digitales en las aulas universitarias, Comunicar, 17 (34); 173-181.
  • INAN, F., LOWTHER, D. L, ROSS, S. M. Y STRAHL, D. (2010). Pattern of classroom activities during students' use of computers; Relations between instructional strategies and computer applications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3); 540-546.
  • ISCIOGLU, E. (2011). Perceived computer self-efficacy of secondary education teachers. New Educational Review, 23 (1); 189-198.
  • JUDD, T. Y KENNEDY, G. (2011). Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by 'Net Generation' students. Computers y Education, 56(3); 625- 631.
  • JUNCO, R. Y COTTON, S. (2011). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers y Education, 56(2); 370-378.
  • KERR, O. (2011). Ex ante regulation of computer search and seizure. Virginia Law Review, 96(6); 1241-1293.
  • KOH, J.L. Y FRICK, T. (2009). Instructor and student classroom interactions during technology skills instruction for facilitating preservice teachers' computer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40 (2); 211-228.
  • KOWALSKI, R., et al. (2008). Cyber bullying; Bullying in the digital age, Blackwell Publishing.
  • LI, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine; A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4); 1777-1791.
  • LOCATIS, C., et al. (2008). A virtual computer lab for distance biomedical technology education. BMC Medical Education, 8(1); 12.
  • LÓPEZ, M. V., DAPOZO, G. N., GREINER, C. L. Y ESPÍNDOLA, M. C. (2012). Entorno virtual como soporte a la formación de informáticos en una universidad del Nordeste Argentino. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 39.
  • LOWERISON, G., et al. (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers y Education, 47(4); 465-489.
  • LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES (2009). Directory of Open Access Journals, http;//www.doaj.org/ (04-11-2010).
  • MARTIN, A., PICOS, A. Y EGIDO, L. (2010). School teacher training and ICT integration in education; anatomy of a mismatch. Revista de Educación, 353, 267-293.
  • OYEWOLE, S., HAIGHT, J. M. Y FREIVALDS, A. (2010). The ergonomic design of classroom furniture/computer work station for first graders in the elementary school. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(4); 437-447.
  • PEDROSA, M., et al. (2001). La computadora y las actividades del aula; Algunas perspectivas en la educación general básica de la provincia de Buenos Aires. REDIE; Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 3(2).
  • PRENSKY, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5); 1-6.
  • ROLANDO, M. Y SALVADOR, CH. (2009). Knowledge System for Application of Computer Security Rules. Conference Information; 2nd International Workshop on Computational Intelligence for Security in Information Systems. Book Series; Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 63; 9-17.
  • SCHRAW, G. (2010). Measuring self-regulation in computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4); 258-266.
  • SELWYN, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning; a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (2); 83-94.
  • SELWYN, N. (2009). The digital native–myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings; New Information Perspectives, Emerald Group Publishing.
  • SHELL, D. Y HUSMAN, J. (2008). Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom; A multidimensional phenomenon. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2); 443-459.
  • SMITH, P. K., et al. (2008). Cyberbullying; Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4); 376-385.
  • SUREDA, J., et al. (2010). Menores y acceso a Internet en el hogar; las normas familiares. Comunicar, 17(34); 135-143.
  • TONDEUR, J., VAN BRAAK, J. Y VALCKE, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3); 197-206.
  • WILLINGHAM, D. (2010). Have technology and multitasking rewired how students learn? American Educator, 23.
  • WITTEN, I., et al. (2009). How to Build a Digital Library, Morgan Kaufmann Elsevier Science: San Francisco.
  • YOUNG, J. (2008). A Computer lab that students use but never see. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(38); 1.
  • FOMBONA, J.; GONZÁLEZ, M. del C.; & GOULGO, M. de F. (2012). Estudio de la normatividad de los espacios informáticos académicos en Iberoamérica. EDUTEC, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 42. Recuperado el dd/mm/aa de http://edutec.rediris.es/Revelec2/Revelec42/estudio_normatividad_espacios_informaticos_academicos_iberoamerica.html
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet