La contención del abandono escolar temprano: una evaluación cualitativa del Programa para la Mejora del Aprendizaje y el Rendimiento en Asturias

  1. Ángel Alonso-Domínguez 1
  2. Rosario González-Arias 2
  3. Israel Escudero-Castillo 2
  4. Francisco Javier Mato-Díaz 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo. Departamento de Sociología. España
  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
Acciones e investigaciones sociales

ISSN: 1132-192X

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 45

Pages: 83-102

Type: Article

DOI: 10.26754/OJS_AIS/ACCIONESINVESTIGSOC.2024459656 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Acciones e investigaciones sociales

Abstract

The article assesses the Program for the Improvement of Learning and Performance (PMAR, by its Spanish acronym), which Spain has used since the 2013 educational reform in the fight against premature school leaving. Although there is some work evaluating the implementation process of this program in its earliest stages, this study is the first to provide results since its full implementation. The research is based upon thirty semi-structured interviews carried out with principals, guidance counsellors, teachers and students in the Spanish region of Asturias. Despite the unsympathetic stance on the 2013 reform among the teaching community, and despite the fears that the changes in Early School Leaving (ESL) prevention would reduce graduation in compulsory education, the general perception of the PMAR seems to be a positive one. At the same time, there are some reservations regarding the fact that the program does not extend to secondary school-graduation. Additionally, the research reveals some difficulties in defining the target population of candidates for the program, with the risk of mixing those students with difficulties and those whose problem is more a lack of interest in graduating. Schools are also concerned about the lack of qualified staff to deal with groups with specific needs, the excessive turnover of temporary teaching staff, and the disappearance of the figure of the assigned tutor, who was part of the previous initiative (Curricular Diversification Programs) aimed at reducing ESL. Also significant is the absence of practical modules for students that require them. Finally, absenteeism was identified as one of the most widespread problems in this type of program, especially among the most vulnerable pupils. Problems in the family environment are repeatedly identified among the causes of absenteeism. Thus, the research concludes that families should appear as key informants for an understanding of the problem of ESL in future research.

Bibliographic References

  • Amer, J., and Pascual, B. (2015). Las perspectivas del profesorado y el alumnado sobre la implementación de los programas de diversificación curricular en institutos de enseñanza secundaria del municipio de Palma (Mallorca). Profesorado, Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 19(3), 126-138.
  • Amer, J., and Mir, A. (2017). Los procesos de implementación de los programas de mejora del aprendizaje y el rendimiento (PMAR). Perspectivas del profesorado, el alumnado y las familias. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 28(3), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.5944/reop.vol.28.num.3.2017.21623
  • Cabrera, L., Pérez, C.N., and Santana, F. (2020). Does the Inequality of Educational Opportunities in Primary Education Increase with the School Closure due to the Coronavirus? International Journal of Sociology of Education, Special Issue: COVID-19 Crisis and Socioeducative Inequalities and Strategies to Overcome them, 27-52. http://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2020.5613
  • Choi, A., and Jerrim, J. (2016). The use (and misuse) of PISA in guiding policy reform: the case of Spain. Comparative Education, 52(2), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1142739
  • Christenson, S.L., and Thurlow, M.L. (2004). School Dropouts: Prevention Considerations, Interventions, and Challenges. American Psychological Society, 13(1), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301010.x
  • Cordero Ferrera, J. M., Manchón López, C., and Simancas Rodríguez, R. (2014). La Repetición de Curso y sus Factores Condicionantes en España. Revista de Educación, 365, 12-37. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2014-365-263.
  • De Witte, K., Cabus, S., Thyssen, G., Groot, W., and van den Brink, H. M. (2013). A critical review of the literature on school dropout. Educational Research Review, 10, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.002.
  • Engel, L. C. (2015). Steering the National: Exploring the Education Policy Uses of PISA in Spain. European Education, 47, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2015.1033913
  • European Commission. (2018). Education and Training Monitor 2018. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • European Commission (2020). Education and Training Monitor 2020. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Escudero, J.M., González, M.T., and Martínez, B. (2009). El fracaso escolar como exclusión educativa: comprensión, políticas y prácticas. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie500660
  • Feito, R. (2021). El debate sobre la jornada escolar en España. Reflexiones y datos tras más de tres décadas de un debate inconcluso. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 10(3), 271-293.
  • Fernández-Enguita, M. (2011). Del desapego al desenganche y de éste al fracaso escolar. Revista de Sociología de la Educación, 4(3), 255-269.
  • Fuentes, A. (2009). Raising Education Outcomes in Spain. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, 666. https://doi.org/10.1787/226865111178.
  • Gamella, J.F. (2011). Historias de éxito. Modelos para reducir el abandono escolar de la adolescencia gitana. Colección Estudios CREADE n.º 7. Ministerio de Educación, Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Formación Profesional.
  • González-Rodríguez, D., Vieira, M. J., and Vidal, J. (2019). Factors that influence early school leaving: a comprehensive model, Educational Research, 61(2), 214-230, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596034
  • Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa.
  • Lozano Pérez, M.A., and Trinidad Requena, A. (2019). Cultural Capital as a Predictor of Student Performance in Spain, International Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(1), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2019.3862.
  • Macías, E., Antón, J. I., Braña, F. and Muñoz de Bustillo, R. (2013). Early School‐leaving in Spain. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12000
  • Merino, R., García, M., and Casal, J. (2006). De los Programas de Garantía Social a los Programas de Cualificación Profesional Inicial. Sobre perfiles y dispositivos locales. Revista de Educación, 341, 81-98.
  • Monarca, H., Fernández-González, N., and Piedrahita, C. (2016). ¿Qué opina el profesorado sobre la LOMCE? Revista Educación, Política y Sociedad, 1(2), 197-212.
  • Nada, C. I., Santos, S. A., Macedo, E., and Araújo, H. C. (2018). Can mainstream and alternative education learn from each other? An analysis of measures against school dropout and early school leaving in Portugal, Educational Review, 72(3), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1508127
  • Prevatt, F., and Kelly, F.D. (2003). Dropping Out of School: A Review of Intervention Programs. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00087-6
  • Tarabini, A. (2016). La exclusión desde dentro: o la persistencia de los factores “push” en la explicación del Abandono Escolar Prematuro. Organización y Gestión Educativa. Revista del Fórum Europeo de Administradores de la Educación, 3, 8-12.
  • Tarabini, A., Curran, M., Montes, A. and Parcerisa, Ll. (2018). Can educational engagement prevent Early School Leaving? Unpacking the school’s effect on educational success, Educational Studies, 45(2), 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446327
  • White, S. W., and Kelly, F. D. (2010). The School Counselor’s Role in School Dropout Prevention. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00014.x
  • Wilkerson, K., Afacan, K., Yan, M., Justin, W., and Datar, S. (2015). Academic Remediation-Focused Alternative Schools: Impact on Student Outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515620842
Data source: Dialnet