Is it possible to transfer the learning of writing strategies to an unstructured opinion text? Analyzing the effects of the strategy-focused instruction

  1. Rodríguez-Málaga, Lucía 1
  2. Rodríguez, Celestino 2
  3. González-Sánchez, Lorena 3
  4. Areces, Débora 2
  5. Cueli, Marisol 2
  1. 1 Faculty of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; Faculty of Education, University of Isabel I de Castilla, Castilla y León, Spain
  2. 2 Faculty of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
  3. 3 Faculty of Education, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: May - September

Volumen: 40

Número: 2

Páginas: 254-264

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.571031 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

Antecedentes. Utilizando el programa de Instrucción de la Autorregulación Cognitiva aplicado a la escritura (CSRI) se implementó la instrucción centrada en la estrategia con tres componentes instructivos: Enseñanza Directa, Modelado y Práctica entre iguales. El objetivo de este estudio consiste en comprobar si la instrucción centrada en la estrategia conducía a la transferencia espontánea de estrategias de escritura a un género textual no instruido (texto de opinión), así como examinar si el orden de los componentes tenía algún efecto. Método. Participaron 126 estudiantes de cuarto de educación primaria que se asignaron aleatoriamente a dos condiciones experimentales que diferían en el orden en que se implementaban los componentes instructivos. Además, se incluyó una condición de control con enseñanza tradicional. El rendimiento en la escritura se midió mediante tareas de escritura de textos de opinión, evaluadas mediante el procedimiento de texto de anclaje (Coherencia, Estructura y Calidad). Resultados. Ambas secuencias CSRI mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a estructura y coherencia en el texto de opinión. Conclusiones. La aplicación del programa CSRI supone mejoras en el género textual no instruido (texto de opinión).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beauvais, C., Olive, T., & Passerault, J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between text quality and management of the writing processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022545
  • Bouwer, R., Béguin, A., Sanders, T., & Van den Bergh, H. (2015). Effect of genre on the generalizability of writing scores. Language Testing, 32(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214542994
  • Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a strategy-focused instructional program on the writing quality of upper elementary students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206
  • Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
  • Brunstein, J. C., & Glaser, C. (2011). Testing a path-analytic mediation model of how self-regulated writing strategies improve fourth graders' composition skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 922–938. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024622
  • Carter, O. B., Patterson, L. J., Donovan, R. J., Ewing, M. T., & Roberts, C. M. (2011). Children’s understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 962–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.018
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Erlbaum.
  • De La Paz, S. (2007). Managing cognitive demands for writing: comparing the effects of instructional components in strategy instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560701277609
  • De Smedt, F., & Van Keer, H. (2018). Fostering writing in upper primary grades: A study into the distinct and combined impact of explicit instruction and peer assistance. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9787-4
  • De Smedt, F., Graham, S., & Van Keer, H. (2020). “It takes two”: The added value of structured peer-assisted writing in explicit writing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article e101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101835
  • Deane, P. (2018). The challenges of writing in school: Conceptualizing writing development within a sociocognitive framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844
  • Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Dowdy, N. S. (2000). The effects of an elaborated goal on the persuasive writing of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.694
  • Fidalgo, R., & Torrance, M. (2017). Developing writing skills through cognitive self-regulation instruction. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 89–118). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_006
  • Fidalgo, R., Harris, K. R., & Braaksma, M. (2017). Design principles for teaching effective writing: An introduction. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 3–10). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_002
  • Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., and Álvarez, M. L. (2015). Strategy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a model benefits 6th grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.004
  • Graham, S. (2018). Introduction to conceptualizing writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1514303
  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2017). Evidence-based writing practices: A meta-analysis of existing meta-analyses. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in Writing Series: Design Principles for Teaching Effective Writing (Vol. 34, pp. 13-37). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_003
  • Graham, S., & Alves, R.A. (2021). Research and teaching writing. Reading and Writing 34(7), 1613–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10188-9
  • Graham, S., Harris, K., & Chambers, A. (2016). Evidence-based practice and writing instruction: A review of reviews. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 211-226). The Guilford Press.
  • Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
  • Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2017). Self-Regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 119–151). Brill.
  • Harris, K. R., & McKeown, D. (2022). Overcoming barriers and paradigm wars: Powerful evidence-based writing instruction. Theory Into Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107334
  • Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295-340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002295
  • Kellogg, R. T. (2018). Professional writing expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 413–430). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/9781316480748.023
  • Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). An aptitude-treatment interaction approach to writing to learn. Learning & Instruction, 18(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.004
  • Kiuhara, S. A., O'Neill, R. E., Hawken, L. S., & Graham, S. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching 10th-grade students STOP, AIMS, and DARE for planning and drafting persuasive text. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800305
  • Klein, P., Bildfell, A., Dombroski, J. D., Giese, C., Sha, K. W. Y., & Thompson, S. C. (2022). Self-regulation in early writing strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(2), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1919577
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford Press.
  • Koster, M., Bouwer, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2017). Professional development of teachers in the implementation of a strategy-focused writing intervention program for elementary students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.002
  • Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P., & van den Bergh, H. (2015). Teaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2
  • López, P., Torrance, M. & Fidalgo, R., (2019). The online management of writing processes and their contribution to text quality in upper-primary students. Psicothema: Revista de Psicología, 31(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.326
  • López, P., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Fidalgo, R. (2017). Effects of direct instruction and strategy modeling on upper-primary students’ writing development. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article e1504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01054
  • MacArthur, C. A. (2017). Thoughts on what makes strategy instruction work and how it can be enhanced and extended. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma, (Eds.), Studies in writing series: Design principles for teaching effective writing (Vol. 34, pp. 235–252). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270480_011
  • McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
  • Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. University Press.
  • Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2002). What counts? The predictive powers of subject-matter knowledge, strategic processing, and interest in domain-specific performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220 97020 95995 06
  • Núñez, J. C., Rosario, P., Vallejo, G., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2013). A longitudinal assessment of the effectiveness of a school-based mentoring program in middle school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.002
  • Rietdijk, S., Janssen, T., van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2017) Improving writing in primary schools through a comprehensive writing program. The Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 173–225. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.04
  • Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Tillema, M., Van Steendam, E., & Raedts, M. (2011). Writing. In S. Graham, A. Bus, S. Major, & L. Swanson (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology: Application of educational psychology to learning and teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 189–228). American Psychological Society. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/13275-009
  • Rodríguez, L., Cueli, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2021a). Exploring the effects of strategy-focused instruction in writing skills of 4th grade students. Metacognition and Learning, 16(1), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09247-3
  • Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez, C., & Fidalgo, R. (2021b). Exploring the Short-Term and Maintained Effects of Strategic Instruction on the Writing of 4th Grade Students: Should Strategies be Focused on the Process?. Reading and Writing 34(7), 1769–1790, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10088-4
  • Rosário, P., Högemann, J., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Cunha, J., Rodríguez, C., & Fuentes, S. (2019). The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality. PloS One, 14(7), Article e0218099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0218099
  • Saddler, B., Asaro-Saddler, K., Moeyaert, M., & Cuccio-Slichko, J. (2019). Teaching summary writing to students with learning disabilities via strategy instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(6), 572–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1600085
  • Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.340
  • Seoane, R., Jimenez, J. E., & Gutiérrez, M. (2021). Web-based training program for writing instruction: Preservice teachers’ beliefs profiles and their satisfaction. Psicothema, 33(4), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.19
  • Spencer, S. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1993). Validity and structure, coherence, and quality measures in writing. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862 96930 95478 11
  • Tracy, B., Reid, R., & Graham, S. (2009). Teaching young students strategies for planning and drafting stories: The impact of self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.323-33
  • Traga-Philippakos, Z. A., & MacArthur, C. A. (2020). Integrating collaborative reasoning and strategy instruction to improve second graders’ opinion writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1650315
  • World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0121098902/50031-7
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet