The board of directors and firm innovationA meta-analytical review

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250.
• Aghion, P., van Reenen, J. M., & Zingales, L. (2013). Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103(1), 277–304.
• Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Chapter 1: Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98.
• Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Cetin, A. T. (2015). How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 83–103.
• Arzubiaga, U., Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the board of directors. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 455–469.
• Asensio-López, D., Cabeza-García, L., & González-Álvarez, N. (2019). Corporate governance and innovation: A theoreti-cal review. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 266–284.
• Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. (2016). Board charac-teristics, financial slack and R&D investments: An empirical analysis of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. International Studies of Management and Organization, 46(1), 8–23.
• Baker, H. K., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A. (2020). A bib-liometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, devel-opment, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 108, 232–246.
• Balsmeier, B., Buchwald, A., & Stiebale, J. (2014). Outside directors on the board and innovative firm performance. Research Policy, 43(10), 1800–1815.
• Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2017). Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536–557.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
• Barnhart, S. W., & Rosenstein, S. (1998). Board composition, managerial ownership, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. The Financial Review, 33(4), 1–16.
• Barroso-Castro, C., Villegas-Periñan, M., del, M., & Casillas-Bueno, J. C. (2016). How boards’ internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 6–31.
• Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214.
• Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101.
• Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2013). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Management Journal, 24(1), 85–101.
• Berezinets, I., Berezkin, K., Ilina, Y., & Naoumova, I. (2018). Board of directors as a factor of firm performance in inno-vative companies. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(6), 1–26.
• Bianchi, S., Corvino, A., & Rigolini, A. (2012). Board diversity and structure: What implications for investments in inno-vation? Empirical evidence from Italian context. Corporate Ownership and Control, 10(1), 9–25.
• Blibech, N., & Berraies, S. (2018). The impact of CEO’ duality and board’s size and independence on firms’ innovation and financial performance. Journal of Business Management and Economics, 9(1), 22–29.
• Bobillo, A. M., Rodríguez-Sanz, J. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2018). Corporate governance drivers of firm innovation capacity. Review of International Economics, 26(3), 721–741.
• Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The hand-book of research synthesis (2nd ed., pp. 221–235). Russell Sage Foundation.
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and ran-dom-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.
• Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud [Meta-analysis in health and social sciences]. Síntesis [Synthesis].
• Bravo, F., & Reguera-Alvarado, N. (2017). The effect of board of directors on R&D intensity: Board tenure and multiple directorships. R&D Management, 47(5), 1–14.
• Brick, I. E., & Chidambaran, N. K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 533–553.
• Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2019). Experience wears the trousers: Exploring gender and atti-tude to financial risk. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 163(C), 483–515.
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolu-tion in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
• Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 295–308.
• Buchwald, A., & Thorwarth, S. (2015). Outside directors on the board, competition and innovation (DICE Discussion Papers, 173). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/107067
• Cebula, R. J., & Rossi, F. (2015). Ownership structure and R&D: An empirical analysis of Italian listed companies. PSL Quarterly Review, 68(275), 297–325.
• Chen, C. J., Lin, B. W., Lin, Y. H., & Hsiao, Y. C. (2016). Ownership structure, independent board members and inno-vation performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3371–3379.
• Chen, H.-L. (2012). Board characteristics and R&D investment: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 2(4), 161–170.
• Chen, H.-L. (2013a). CEO tenure, independent directors and corporate innovation. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 3(5), 187–197.
• Chen, H.-L. (2013b). CEO tenure and R&D investment: The moderating effect of board capital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(4), 437–459.
• Chen, H. L., Ho, M. H. C., & Hsu, W. T. (2013). Does board social capital influence chief executive officers’ investment decisions in research and development? R&D Management, 43(4), 381–393.
• Chen, H.-L. L. (2014). Board capital, CEO power and R&D investment in electronics firms. Corporate Governance, 22(5), 422–436.
• Chen, H.-L. L., & Hsu, W.-T. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.
• Chen, J., Leung, W. S., & Evans, K. P. (2018). Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 48, 236–254.
• Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., & Liang, X. (2015). How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate govern-ance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127–1135.
• Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599–621.
• Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176.
• Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Sakr, S., & Lee, S. M. (2016). Do co-opted directors mitigate managerial myopia? Evidence from R&D investments. Finance Research Letters, 17, 285–289.
• Chouaibi, J., & Jarboui, A. (2012). Characteristics of the board of directors and involvement in innovation activities: A cognitive perspective. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 2(3), 65–87.
• Cirera, X., & Muzi, S. (2020). Measuring innovation using firm-level surveys: Evidence from developing countries. Research Policy, 49(3), Article 103912.
• Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analy-sis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.
• Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Towards a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
• De Cleyn, S. H., & Braet, J. (2012). Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 285–308.
• Del Brío, E. B., & Del Brío, I. (2009). Los consejos de administración en las sociedades cotizadas: Avanzando en femenino [Boards of directors in listed companies: Advancing in feminine]. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época[Journal of Business Studies. Second period], 1, 102–118.
• Deman, R., Jorissen, A., & Laveren, E. (2018). Family control and innovativeness in private firms: The mediating role of board task performance. Management Decision, 56(2), 295–310.
• Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444.
• Deutsch, Y. (2007). The influence of outside directors’ stock-option compensation on firms’ R&D. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 816–827.
• Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.
• Dong, J., & Gou, Y. (2010). Corporate governance structure, managerial discretion, and the R&D investment in China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 19(2), 180–188.
• Driver, C., & Guedes, M. J. C. (2012). Research and develop-ment, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies. Research Policy, 41(9), 1565–1577.
• Dustin, G., Bharat, M., & Jitendra, M. (2014). Competitive advantage and motivating innovation. Advances in Management, 7(1), 1–8.
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
• Epstein, D., Angert, C., & Strain, C. (2017). Board of director composition, and ownership and their relationship to patents: An empirical study. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 11(2), 78–87.
• Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2017). Industry expertise on corporate boards. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50(2), 441–479.
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.
• Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
• Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent directors’ background and CSR disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991–1001.
• Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, 92–93, Article 102061.
• Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
• Freeman, R., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4), 337–359.
• Galia, F., & Zenou, E. (2012). Board composition and forms of innovation: Does diversity make a difference? European Journal of International Management, 6(6), 630–650.
• Galia, F., Zenou, E., & Ingham, M. (2015). Board composition and environmental innovation: Does gender diversity mat-ter? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(1), 117–141.
• Gault, F. (2013). Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement. Edward Elgar.
• Gault, F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47(3), 617–622.
• Geyer-Klingeberg, J., Hang, M., & Rathgeber, A. (2020). Meta-analysis in finance research: Opportunities, challenges, and contemporary applications. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, Article 101524.
• Ghosh, S. (2016). Banker on board and innovative activity. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4205–4214.
• Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
• Goergen, M., Renneboog, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Insider trading and networked directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 152–175.
• Gonzales-Bustos, J. P., & Hernández-Lara, A. B. (2014). An exploratory analysis of the board composition in Spanish innovative firms. European Accounting and Management Review, 1(1), 62–92.
• Gonzales-Bustos, J. P., & Hernández-Lara, A. B. (2016). Corporate governance and innovation: A systematic lit-erature review. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(3), 33–45.
• Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241–250.
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
• Gu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2016). Busy directors and corporate inno-vation. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 6(1), 49–62.
• Gu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on corporate innovation. Journal of Economics and Business, 90, 17–30.
• Guldiken, O., & Darendeli, I. S. (2016). Too much of a good thing: Board monitoring and R&D investments. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2931–2938.
• Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
• Han, J., Bose, I., Hu, N., Qi, B., & Tian, G. (2015). Does direc-tor interlock impact corporate R&D investment? Decision Support Systems, 71, 28–36.
• Hancock, J. I., Allen, D. G., Bosco, F. A., McDaniel, K. R., & Pierce, C. A. (2013). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573–603.
• Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. (2018). Board diversity and corporate investment oversight. Journal of Business Research, 90, 40–47.
• Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Data sets. In L. V. Hedges, & I. Olkin (Eds.), Statistical methods for meta-analysis (pp. 15–26). Academic Press.
• Helmers, C., Patnam, M., & Rau, P. R. (2017). Do board interlocks increase innovation? Evidence from a corporate governance reform in India. Journal of Banking and Finance, 80, 51–70.
• Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1988). The determinants of board composition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), 589–606.
• Hernández, A. B., Camelo, C., & Valle, R. (2010). The effects of boards of directors on R&D investments: The case of Spain. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 10(2), 152–165.
• Hernández-Lara, A. B., Camelo-Ordaz, C., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2014). Does board member stock ownership influence the effect of board composition on innovation? European Journal of International Management, 8(4), 355–372.
• Hernández-Lara, A. B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2019). The impact of interlocking directorates on innovation: The effects of busi-ness and social ties. Management Decision, 57(10), 2799–2815.
• Héroux, S., & Fortin, A. (2016). Innovation: The influence of diversity and IT competence of boards of directors and exec-utive management. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 8(3), 18–43.
• Herrmann, P., Kaufmann, J., & Van Auken, H. (2010). The role of corporate governance in R&D intensity of US-based international firms. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(2), 91–108.
• Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.
• Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence per-spectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.
• Hoang, T. C., Abeysekera, I., & Ma, S. (2017). The effect of board diversity on earnings quality: An empirical study of listed firms in Vietnam. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 146–163.
• Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional own-ership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.
• Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1207–1251.
• Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analy-sis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193–206.
• Jensen, C., & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
• Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.
• Jermias, J. (2007). The effects of corporate governance on the relationship between innovative efforts and performance. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 827–854.
• Jia, N. (2016). Should directors have term limits? Evidence from Corporate Innovation. European Accounting Review, 26(4), 755–785.
• Jiraporn, P., Lee, S. M., Park, K. J., & Song, H. J. (2017). How do independent directors influence innovation productivity? A quasi-natural experiment. Applied Economics Letters, 25(7), 435–441.
• Johnson, S., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. (2013). Board composi-tion beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.
• Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
• Kang, J. K., Liu, W. L., Low, A., & Zhang, L. (2018). Friendly boards and innovation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 45, 1–25.
• Kang, S., Kim, E. H., & Lu, Y. (2017). Does independent directors’ CEO experience matter? Review of Finance, 22(3), 905–949.
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
• Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284–291.
• Kim, N., & Kim, E. (2015). Board capital and exploration: From a resource provisional perspective. Management Decision, 53(9), 2156–2174.
• Kohli, R., & Devaraj, S. (2003). Measuring information technol-ogy payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 127–145.
• Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top manage-ment team and board compositions on R&D investment strat-egy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099.
• Lacetera, N. (2001). Corporate governance and the governance of innovation: The case of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(1), 29–59.
• Le, S. A., Walters, B., & Kroll, M. (2006). The moderating effects of external monitors on the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 278–287.
• Liang, Q., Li, X., Yang, X., Lin, D., & Zheng, D. (2013). How does family involvement affect innovation in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 677–695.
• Lim, E. (2015). Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 127(1), 12–13.
• Lin, W. C., & Chang, S. C. (2012). Corporate governance and the stock market reaction to new product announcements. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 39(2), 273–291.
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
• Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance: Business source. Business Lawyer, 42(1), 59–78.
• Lu, C. S., Chen, A., & Kao, L. (2017). How product market com-petition and complexity influence the on-job-learning effect and entrenchment effect of board tenure. International Review of Economics and Finance, 50, 175–195.
• Lu, J., & Wang, W. (2015). Board independence and corpo-rate investments. Review of Financial Economics, 24(1), 52–64.
• Lu, J., & Wang, W. (2018). Managerial conservatism, board inde-pendence and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 1–16.
• Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 375–388.
• Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.
• Marín-Idárraga, D. A., Hurtado González, J. M., & Cabello Medina, C. (2020). Factors affecting the effect of exploitation and exploration on performance: A meta-analysis. Business Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420972707
• Mezghanni, B. S. (2011). The moderating effects of the board of directors on the relationship between R&D investment and firm performance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 6(3), 264–293.
• Miller, T., & Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm perfor-mance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.
• Mukarram, S. S., Ajmal, T., & Saeed, A. (2018). Women direc-tors’ propensity towards risk in technology firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(2), 353–367.
• OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD Publishing.
• Patro, S., Zhang, L. Y., & Zhao, R. (2018). Director tenure and corporate social responsibility: The tradeoff between experience and independence. Journal of Business Research, 93(C), 51–66.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organi-zations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
• Reguera-Alvarado, N., & Bravo, F. (2017). The impact of directors’ high-tech experience on innovation in low-tech firms. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 20(3), 223–239.
• Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11(6), 446–453.
• Rossi, F., & Cebula, R. J. (2015). Does the board of directors affect the extent of corporate R&D? Evidence from Italian listed companies. Economics Bulletin, 35(4), 2567–2580.
• Rossi, F., Hu, C., & Foley, M. (2017). Women in the boardroom and corporate decisions of Italian listed companies: Does the “criti-cal mass” matter? Management Decision, 55(7), 1578–1595.
• Sánchez-Meca, J., & Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: Herramientas para la práctica profesional [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Tools for professional practice]. Papeles del Psicólogo [Papers of the Psychologist], 31(1), 7–17.
• Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & López-López, J. A. (2011). Meta-analysis and evidence-based psychosocial intervention. Psychosocial Intervention, 20(1), 95–107.
• Sena, V., Duygun, M., Lubrano, G., Marra, M., & Shaban, M. (2018). Board independence, corruption and innovation. Some evidence on UK subsidiaries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 22–43.
• Shaikh, I. A., O’Brien, J. P., & Peters, L. (2018). Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms. Journal of Business Research, 82, 192–201.
• Shaikh, I. A., & Peters, L. (2017). The value of board monitoring in promoting R&D: A test of agency-theory in the US context. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 339–363.
• Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the inno-vation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311–335.
• Sharma, J. P., Jhunjhunwala, S., & Sharda, S. (2018). Corporate governance and innovation. In S. Dhir Sushil (Eds.), Flexible strategies in VUCA Markets (pp. 63–75). Springer.
• Shelby, L. B., & Vaske, J. J. (2008). Understanding meta-analysis: A review of the methodological literature. Leisure Sciences, 30(2), 96–110.
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684–708.
• Sousa, M. R., & Ribeiro, A. L. (2009). Revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de estudios de diagnóstico y pronóstico: Una guía [Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and pronostic studies: A guide]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 92(3), 241–251.
• Srinivasan, R., Wuyts, S., & Mallapragada, G. (2017). Corporate board interlocks and new product introductions. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 132–148.
• Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014). Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 152–173.
• Stanley, T., & Doucouliagos, H. (2012). Meta-regression analy-sis in economics & business. Routledge.
• Stone, D. L., & Rosopa, P. J. (2017). The advantages and limi-tations of using meta-analysis in human resource manage-ment research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 1–7.
• Swift, T. (2018). Ph.D. scientists in the boardroom: The innova-tion impact. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(2), 184–202.
• Tai, V. W., Lai, Y. H., & Yang, T. H. (2018). The role of the board and the audit committee in corporate risk manage-ment. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 54, Article 100879.
• Takahiro, N. (2015a). Corporate governance and corporate investment: In terms of strategic management. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 17(10), 54–63.
• Takahiro, N. (2015b). Different board structures and R&D: Evidence from Japanese corporation. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 11(2), 171–182.
• Takahiro, N. (2015c). The relationship between corporate gov-ernance and technological innovation: Evidence from Japanese electronics corporations. The Macrotheme Review, 4(4), 90–94.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capa-bilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women direc-tors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.
• Triana, M., del, C., Richard, O. C., & Su, W. (2019). Gender diversity in senior management, strategic change, and firm perfor-mance: Examining the mediating nature of strategic change in high tech firms. Research Policy, 48(7), 1681–1693.
• Tribbitt, M. A., & Yang, Y. (2017). An agency perspective on the board of directors and corporate entrepreneurship. Management Research Review, 40(11), 1201–1215.
• Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm perfor-mance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142.
• Valencia, V. S. (2018). Corporate governance and CEO innovation. Atlantic Economic Journal, 46(1), 43–58.
• Van Essen, M., Van Oosterhout, J. H., & Carney, M. (2012). Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 873–905.
• Vevea, J. L., Coburn, K., & Sutton, A. (2019). Publication bias. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 383–429). Russell Sage Foundation.
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metaphor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
• Wang, M. S. (2011). Innovation capital and firm performance: To explore the deferral effect and the revisited measure-ment. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(2), 64–79.
• Whitler, K. A., Krause, R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2018). When and how board members with marketing experience facilitate firm growth. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 86–105.
• Williamson, O. (1983). Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review, 73(4), 519–540.
• Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Boter, H. (2009). Network board con-tinuity and effectiveness of open innovation in Swedish stra-tegic small-firm networks. R&D Management, 39(1), 55–67.
• Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 265–275.
• Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvist, D. (2012). Supporting innovation in government-sponsored networks: The role of network board composition. International Small Business Journal, 31(8), 997–1020.
• Wu, H.-L. (2008a). How do board-CEO relationships influence the performance of new product introduction? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 77–89.
• Wu, H.-L. (2008b). When does internal governance make firms innovative? Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 141–153.
• Xie, X., & O’Neill, H. (2013). Boards as resource providers and monitors for research and development. Journal of Business Strategies, 30(2), 180–204.
• Xu, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2018). Board age and corporate financial fraud: An interactionist view. Long Range Planning, 51(6), 815–830.
• Yoo, T., & Sung, T. (2015). How outside directors facilitate corporate R&D investment? Evidence from large Korean firms. Journal of Business Research, 68(8), 1251–1260.
• Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry tech-nological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.
• Zona, F. (2016). Agency models in different stages of CEO tenure: The effects of stock options and board independence on R&D investment. Research Policy, 45(2), 560–575.
• Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315.