Redes de políticas en el marco de la Agenda Urbana para la UE. La influencia de las coaliciones temáticas en la politización de la toma de decisiones a escala europea

  1. Sevillano, Alicia 1
  2. González-Medina, Moneyba 2
  3. Bouza, Luis 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Instituto de Derecho y Gobierno Local
Revue:
Revista española de ciencia política

ISSN: 1575-6548

Année de publication: 2023

Número: 61

Pages: 37-63

Type: Article

DOI: 10.21308/RECP.61.02 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista española de ciencia política

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

This article explores the role of multilevel thematic partnerships method in building a specific policy, namely, the Urban Agenda for the European Union (EU) adopted in 2016. This method, designed as a pilot experiment, formalizes cooperation among different levels of government as well as public and private actors. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implementation of the multilevel governance approach and to determine the extent to which the thematic partnerships method contributes to the politicization of a decision-making process at the European level. For this purpose, the methodological design is based on network analysis applied to four case studies, namely, the following four thematic partnerships: Inclusion of Migrants and Refugees, Urban Poverty, Climate Action and Security in Public Spaces. Firstly, the results show a higher mobilization of stakeholders representing local interests; secondly, it is also shown that the monetization of the problem determines the nature of stakeholders (stakeholders representing social or economic interests) that join the policy networks. In sum, this article makes an empirical contribution to multilevel governance and politicization studies on the one hand, and to urban and European studies on the other.

Références bibliographiques

  • Atkinson, Rob y Cristiana Rossignolo. 2010. «Cities and the «soft side» of Europeanization: the role of urban networks», en Alexander Hamedinger y Alexander Wolffhardt (eds.), The Europeanization of cities: policies, urban change and urban networks. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
  • Beyers, Jan y Bart Kerremans. 2004. «Bureaucrats, politicians, and societal interests: How is European policy making politicized?», Comparative Political Studies, 37 (10): 1119-1150. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0010414004269828.
  • Beveridge, Ross y Philippe Koch. 2019. «Depoliticization and urban politics: moving beyond the “post-political” city», en Jim Buller, Pinar E. Dönmez, Adam Standring y Matthew Wood (eds.), Comparing strategies of (de)politicisation in Europe: governance, resistance and anti-politics. Nueva York: Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64236-9_8.
  • Bouza, Luis. 2011. «La participación autonómica y local en redes de cooperación europea», Revista de Estudios de la Administración Local y Autonómica, 315-316: 67-94. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24965/reala.vi315-316.10037.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1998a. Global cities, global states: global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Londres: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347633.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1998b. «Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales», Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16 (4): 459-481. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1068 %2Fd160459.
  • Brenner, Neil. 2003. «La formación de la ciudad global y el re-escalamiento del espacio del Estado en la Europa Occidental post-fordista», EURE Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbanos Regionales, 29 (86): 5-35. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612003008600001.
  • Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck y Nick Theodore. 2010. «After Neoliberalization?», Globalizations, 7 (3): 327-345. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669669.
  • Chaqués Bonafont, Laura. 2004. Redes de políticas públicas. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
  • Comisión Europea. 2019. «Urban Agenda for the European Union. Multi-level governance in action». Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/13KgxXY.
  • De Frantz, Monika. 2022. «The politics of the EU Urban Agenda: Mobilising the “Right to the City” for European governance?», Urban Research and Practice, 15 (5): 655-678. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1896029.
  • De Wilde, Pieter. 2011. «No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration», Journal of European Integration, 33 (5): 559-575. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849.
  • De Wilde, Pieter, Anna Leupold y Henning Schmidtke. 2016. «Introduction: the differentiated politicisation of European governance», West European Politics, 39 (1): 3-22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505.
  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. y Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. «Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges», Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25-32. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
  • ESPON. 2018. «Network governance in the Netherlands: Dutch City Deals». Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/p3KgIZw.
  • Eurocities. 2018. «The Urban Agenda for the EU: Cities - EU partners delivering added value for citizens». Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/53KgHrG.
  • González-Medina, Moneyba y María Ángeles Huete-García. 2018. «Procesos de agenda y políticas de desarrollo urbano: centrando la cuestión», Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 20: 6-13. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10594.
  • González-Medina, Moneyba, María Ángeles Huete-García y Rafael Merino Rodríguez. 2016. «La evolución de la agenda urbana de la Unión Europea. Hacia un modelo de desarrollo urbano sostenible e integrado», Parámetros de Sostenibilidad, 4: 83-95. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.24310/wps.vi4.14011.
  • González-Medina, Moneyba. 2011. «Elementos de una política urbana europea. Experiencias de gestión del desarrollo urbano en Alemania y España», Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 27: 45-67.
  • González-Medina, Moneyba. 2013. «La europeización urbana a través de la política de cohesión», Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 1043: 133-154.
  • Haas, Peter M. 1992. «Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination», International Organization, 46 (1): 1-35. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.
  • Heiskala, Risto y Jari Aro (eds.). 2018. Policy design in the European Union: an empire of shopkeepers in the making. Nueva York: Springer. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64849-1.
  • Hooghe, Liesbet y Gary Marks. 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Hooghe, Liesbet y Gary Marks. 2009. «A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus», British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1): 1-23. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/
  • Jessop, Bob. 1998a. «The narrative of enterprise and the enterprise of narrative: Place marketing and the entrepreneurial city», en Amer Althubaity (ed.), The entrepreneurial city: geographies of politics, regime and representation. Sussex: Jon Wiley and Son.
  • Jessop, Bob. 1998b. «The rise of governance and the risk of failure: the case of economic development», International Social Science Journal, 50 (155): 29-45. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00107.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2016. The State: past, present, future. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2016. «The politicization of european integration», Journal of Common Market Studies, 54: 32-47. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12406.
  • Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. «Four systems of policy, politics, and choice», Public Administration Review, 32 (4): 298-310. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/974990.
  • Mamadouh, Virginie. 2018. «The city, the (Member) state, and the European Union», Urban Geography, 39 (9): 1435-1439. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1453453.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. El retorno de lo político: comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • ONU-Habitat y OCDE. 2018. «Global state of national urban policy». Disponible en: https://unhabitat.org/global-state-of-national-urban-policy.
  • ONU-Habitat. 2020. «Sub-national urban policy: a guide». Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/V3KhfSx.
  • Peters, B. Guy y John A. Hoornbeek. 2005. «The problem of policy problems», en Pearl Eliadis, Margaret Hill y Michael Howlett (eds.), Designing Government: from instruments to governance. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Peters, B. Guy y John Pierre. 1998. «Governance without government? Rethinking public administration», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8 (2): 223-243. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379.
  • Peters, B. Guy. 2017. «What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program», Policy and Society, 36 (3): 385-396. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633.
  • Rancière, Jacques. 2019. Disenso: Ensayos sobre estética y política. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Sevillano, Alicia. 2020. La Agenda Urbana para la Unión Europea. Politización de la gobernanza europea de las ciudades [TFM]. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Stephenson, Paul. 2013. «Twenty years of multi-level governance: “Where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?”», Journal of European Public Policy, 20 (6): 817-837. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781818.
  • Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. «The post-political city», en Gideon Boie y Matthias Pauwels (eds.), Urban politics now: re-imagining democracy in the neoliberal city. Rotterdam: Netherland Architecture Institute Publishers.
  • Swyngedouw, Erik. 2011. «¡La naturaleza no existe! La sostenibilidad como síntoma de una planificación despolitizada», Urban, 1: 41-66.
  • Termeer, Catrien J., Art Dewulf y Robbert Biesbroek. 2019. «A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice», Policy and Society, 38 (2): 167-179. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1617971.
  • Tosun, Jale y Achim Lang. 2017. «Policy integration: mapping the different concepts», Policy Studies, 38 (6): 553-570. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
  • Van den Berg, Leo, Erik Braun y Jan Van Der Meer. 2018. National urban policies in the European Union. Responses to urban issues in the fifteen Member States. Londres: Routledge. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429445965.
  • Van den Brande, Luc. 2014. «Multilevel governance and partnership. The Van den Brande Report». Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/D3KhSng.
  • Van den Hurk, Martijn y Tuna Tasan-Kok. 2020. «Contractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance: flexibility and leeway in urban regeneration projects», Urban Studies, 57 (16): 3217-3235. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177 %2F0042098019894277.
  • Verhelst, Tom. 2017. «Processes and patterns of urban Europeanisation: Evidence from the EUROCITIES network», Territory of Research on Settlements and Environment, 10 (1): 75-96.
  • Yin, Robert K. 2016. Qualitative research from start to finish. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2011. En defensa de causas perdidas. Madrid: Akal.
La source de données: Dialnet