Educación Física con Significado (EFcS)un planteamiento de futuro para todo el alumnado

  1. Javier Fernandez-Rio 1
  2. Pablo Saiz-González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes: REEFD

ISSN: 1133-6366

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 437

Páginas: 1-9

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.55166/REEFD.V437I4.1129 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes: REEFD

Resumen

Diversas organizaciones y docentes anónimos vienen reclamando un mayor número de horas de clase de Educación Física de manera obligatoria, sin embargo, diferentes estudios señalan que un porcentaje significativo del alumnado considera negativas sus experiencias en las clases de esta asignatura. Por tanto, parece que es más una cuestión de calidad que de cantidad, de tener un impacto positivo en la vida de nuestros estudiantes. Desde hace muy pocos años, se está extendiendo un enfoque para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la Educación Física denominado “Meaningful Physical Education”, que hemos denomina Educación Física con Significado (EFcS). Los autores que han desarrollado este planteamiento señalan la existencia de seis elementos fundamentales que deben aparecer en toda experiencia de Educación Física para que ésta tenga “significado” para todos los estudiantes: 1. Interacción social [Social interaction], 2. Desafío justo [Challenge], 3. Aprendizaje personalmente relevante [Personally Relevant Learning], 4. Disfrute [Delight], 5. Diversión [Fun] y 6. Competencia motriz [Motor Competence]. En el presente artículo se desgrana cada uno de ellos desde los diferentes marcos teóricos que los sustentan. Finalmente, se proporcionan indicaciones para que los docentes puedan integrarlos en sus clases de manera fácil y rápida. Si los modelos pedagógicos “llegaron para quedarse”, la Educación física con Significado (EFcS) representa el futuro de esta materia.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abós, A., García-González, L., Aibar, A., & Sevil-Serrano, J. (2021). Towards a better under-standing of the role of perceived task variety in physical education: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 56, 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101988
  • Ahmadi, A., Noetel, M., Parker, P., Ryan, R. M., Ntoumanis, N., Reeve, J., Beauchamp, M., Dicke, T., Yeung, A., Ahmadi, M., Bartholomew, K., Chiu, T. K. F., Curran, T., Erturan, G., Flunger, B., Frederick, C., Froiland, J. M., González-Cutre, D., Haerens, L., Jeno, L. M., Koka, A., Krijgsman, C., Langdon, J., White, R. L., Litalien, D., Lubans, D., Mahoney, J., Nalipay, M.. J. N., Patall, E., Perlman, D., Quested, E., Schneider, S., Standage, M., Stroet, K., Tessier, D., Thogersen-Ntoumani, C., Tilga, H., Vasconcellos, D., & Lonsdale, C. (2023). A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behav-iors Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783
  • Albarracín, A., Moreno, J. A., & Beltrán, V. J. (2014). La situación actual de la educación física según su profesorado: Un estudio cualitativo con profesores de la Región de Murcia. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 9(27), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v9i27.469
  • Alcántara-Porcuna, V., Sánchez-López, M., Martínez-Andrés, M., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., Ruiz-Hermosa, A., & Rodríguez-Martín, B. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators of the School Environment for Physical Activity in Schoolchildren: A Qualitative Study. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 14(7), 1113–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2037696
  • Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitive-motivational analysis. En C. Ames y R. Ames (Eds.),Research on motivation in educa-tion (Vol. 3, pp. 177-207). Academic Press.
  • Beni, S., Fletcher, T., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2017). Meaningful experiences in physical education and youth sport: A review of the literature.Quest,69(3), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1224192
  • Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion–performance and coordination–performance relationships of newly formed teams.Small Group Research,51(5), 551-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420907157
  • Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2012). Student motivation in physical education and engage-ment in physical activity. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35, 267–285.
  • Burgueño, R. Abós, A., Sevil-Serrano, J., Haerens, L., De Cocker, K., & García-González, L. (2023), A Circumplex Approach to (de)motivating Styles in Physical Education: Situa-tions-In-School–Physical Education Questionnaire in Spanish Students, Pre-Service, and In-Service Teachers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2248098
  • Chen, A. (1998). Meaningfulness in physical education: A description of high school students’ conceptions.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,17(3), 285-306.
  • Dudley, D., Mackenzie, E., Van Bergen, P., Cairney, J., & Barnett, L. (2022). What Drives Quality Physical Education? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Learning and Development. Effects from Physical Education-Based Interventions. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 13, 799330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.799330
  • Fernandez-Rio, J. (2017). Redefining Students' Success (Learning-oriented, Self-referenced) in Today's Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(3), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2016.1271251
  • Fernandez-Rio, J., Calderon, A., Hortigüela, D., Perez-Pueyo, A. y Aznar, M. (2016). Modelos pedagógicos en educación física:Consideraciones teórico-prácticas para docentes.Re-vista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 413, 55-75
  • Fernandez-Rio, J., García, S., & Ferriz-Valero, A. (2023). Selecting (or not) physical education as an elective subject: Spanish high school students’ views. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2256762
  • Fernandez-Rio, J., Hortigüela, D. y Perez-Pueyo, A. (2018). Revisando los modelos pedagógi-cos en educación física. Ideas clave para incorporarlos al aula.Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 423, 57-80.
  • Fernandez-Rio, J., & Iglesias, D. (2022). What do we know about pedagogical models in phys-ical education so far? An umbrella review.Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2022.2039615
  • Fletcher, T., Ni Chróinin, D., Gleddie, D., & Beni, S. (2021a). Meaningful Physical Education. An Approach for Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
  • Fletcher, T., Ni Chróinin, D., Gleddie, D., & Beni, S. (2021b). The why, what and how of Meaningful Physical Education. In T. Fltecher, D. Ni Chróinin, D. Gleddie and S. Beni (eds) Meaningful Physical Education. An Approach for Teaching and Learning (pp. 3-19). Routledge.
  • González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory.Personality and Individual Differences,102, 159-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The process by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology, 95(4), 784-795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.784
  • Hastie, P. A. (2023). Sport Pedagogy Research and Its Contribution to the Rediscovery of Joyful Participation in Physical Education.Kinesiology Review,12(1), 28-35.
  • Hollett, N., Brock, S. J., Cosgrove, B., Grimes, J. R., Hastie, P., & Wadsworth, D. (2022). ‘Involve me, and I learn’: Effects of social status on students’ physical activity, skill, and knowledge during group work.European Physical Education Review,28(4), 1025-1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221103354
  • How, Y. M., Whipp, P., Dimmock, J., & Jackson, B. (2013). The effects of choice on autono-mous motivation, perceived autonomy support, and physical activity levels in high school physical education.Journal of teaching in physical education,32(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.32.2.131
  • Howley, D., Dyson, B., Baek, S., Fowler, J., & Shen, Y. (2022). Opening up Neat New Things: Exploring Understandings and Experiences of Social and Emotional Learning and Meaningful Physical Education Utilizing Democratic and Reflective Pedagogies.Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 11229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811229
  • Kirk, D. (2012). What is the future for physical education in the 21st century? In S. Capel & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Debates in physical education(pp. 220–231). Routledge.
  • Kirk, D. (2019). Precarity, Critical Pedagogy and Physical Education. Routledge.
  • Kretchmar, R. S. (2007). What to do with meaning? A research conundrum for the 21st cen-tury.Quest, 59,373-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483559
  • Leo, F. M., Pulido, J. J., Sánchez-Oliva, D., López-Gajardo, M. A., & Mouratidis, A. (2022). See the forest by looking at the trees: Physical education teachers’ interpersonal style profiles and students’ engagement. European Physical Education Review, 28(3), 720-738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221075501
  • Lochbaum, M., Sisneros C., & Kazak, Z. (2023). The 3 × 2 Achievement Goals in the Educa-tion, Sport, and Occupation Literatures: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Eu-ropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(7), 1130-1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13070085
  • Lowrie, T. (2002). Designing a framework for problem posing: Young children generating open-ended tasks.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood,3(3), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2002.3.3.4
  • Martela, F., Lehmus-Sun, A., Parker, P. D., Pessi, A. B., & Ryn, R. M. (2022). Needs and well-being across Europe. Basic psychological needs are closely connected with well-being, meaning and symptoms of depression in 27 European countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221113678
  • Mayo-Rota, C., Diloy-Peña, S., García-Cazorla, J., Abós, Ángel, & García-González, L. (2022). Las conductas motivacionales docentes en educación física desde la óptica del modelo circular: efectos sobre el lado oscuro de la motivación del alumnado.Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 463(3), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.55166/reefd.vi463(3).1078
  • Menescardi, C., De Meester, A., Morbée, S., Haerens, L., & Estevan, I., (2022). The role of motivation into the conceptual model of motor development in childhood. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 14(5), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102188
  • Murphy, B. A., Watts, A. L., Baker, Z. G., Don, B. P., Jolink, T. A., & Algoe, S. B. (2022). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scales Probably Do Not Validly Measure Need Frustration. Psychological Assessment,35(2), 127–139. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0001193
  • Ní Chróinín, D., Fletcher, T., Beni, S., Griffin, C., & Coulter, M. (2021). Children’s experiences of pedagogies that prioritise meaningfulness in primary physical education in Ireland. Education 3-13, 51(1), 41-54.https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1948584
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  • Senninger, T. (2000).Abenteuer leiten in abenteuern lernen.OEkotopia.
  • Thijssen, M. W., Rege, M., & Solheim, O. J. (2022). Teacher relationship skills and student learning.Economics of Education Review,89, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102251
  • UNESCO (2021). How to Influence the Development of Quality Physical Education Policy: A Policy Advocacy Toolkit for Youth.https://unes-doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231101
  • Van Doren, N., Katrien De Cocker, K., Flamant, N., Compernolle, S., Vanderlinde, R., & Hae-rens, L. (2023). Observing physical education teachers’ need-supportive and need-thwarting styles using a circumplex approach: how does it relate to student outcomes? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2230256
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini‐theories of self‐determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and fu-ture directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, vol. 16A –The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105–165). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A007
  • Slavin, R. E. (2014). Aprendizaje cooperativo y rendimiento académico: ¿por qué funciona el trabajo en grupo?Anales de psicología,30(3), 785-791.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet