Si pavorida y despavorida, ¿por qué no *pampanante y despampanante? Apunte de morfología deconstructivista sobre un 'gap' lexicológico de la lengua castellana

1. Rafael Núñez Ramos ¹
2. Javier García Rodríguez ¹
3. Guillermo Lorenzo González ¹

Esportatu

Esportatu

×

MLA

modern-language-association

APA

apa

Chicago

chicago-fullnote-bibliography

Harvard

harvard-cite-them-right

Vancouver

vancouver-author-date

---

RIS BibTex

Esportatu

×

Dokumentua ezin da beste atari batetik esportatu.

Testu osoa

lock_openTestu osoa externo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Tropelias: Revista de teoría de la literatura y literatura comparada

Laburpena

This exercise in Deconstructivist Morphology keeps track of the symbolic drift that follows from the leaks, cracked gates, *setfowards and setbacks of the (de)compositional processes of word (de)formation in the Spanish language. It is observed that the dubious reverse terminological plasticity associated and dissociated to the verb despampanar and its many echoes explains the more than justifiable interpretative incontinence (or drift of the interpretant) when facing samples of the poetic heritage that folklorism naively considers semantically monolithic.

Datuen iturria: Dialnet