Una clasificación de las teorías éticas sobre el aborto

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abbate, Ch. E. (2015). «Adventures in moral consistency: How to develop an abortion ethic through an animal rights framework», en: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18, 145-164, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9515-y
• Abbott, P. (1978). «Philosophers and the abortion question», en: Political Theory, 6,3, 313-335.
• Alonso Bedate, C. (1989). «Reflexiones sobre cuestiones de vida y muerte: Hacia un nuevo pradigma de comprensión del valor ético de la entidad biológica humana en desarrollo», en: Francesc Abel, Edouard Bone y Harvey Jonh (eds.) La vida humana: Origen y desarrollo. Reflexiones éticas de científicos y moralistas. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, pp. 57-81.
• Álvarez, R. M. y Brehm, J. (1995). «American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values», en: American Journal of Political Science, 39,4, 1055-108, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-2-7
• Álvarez-Manninen, B. (2007). «Revisiting the argument from fetal potential» en: Philosophy, Ethics and Humanities in medicine, 2, 7, 1-16, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-2-7
• Álvarez-Manninen, B. (2010). «Rethinking Roe vs. Wade: Defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition» en: The American Journal of Bioethics, 10,12, 33-46, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2010.528508
• Alvargonzález, D. (2009). La clonación, la anticoncepción y el aborto en la sociedad biotecnológica. Oviedo: Pentalfa.
• Alvargonzález, D. (2015). "Towards a non-ethics-based consensual public policy of abortion". en International Journal of Health Planning and Management 32,1: e39-e46.
• Alvargonzález, D. (2016). «The constitution of the human embryo as substantial change», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 41, 2, 172-191, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv062
• Anscombe, Gertrude E.M. (1992-93) «Were you a zygote?» en: Philosophy, 18 (supplement), 1985, 111-16.Araujo, Robert J., «Abortion, ethics, and the common good: Who are we; What do we want; How do we get there», en: Marquette Law Review, 76, 701-754.
• Aristóteles (1990). Sobre la generación de los animales. Madrid: Gredos.
• Aristóteles (1983). Acerca del alma. Madrid: Gredos.
• Barbado, M. (O.P.) (1943). «¿Cuándo se une el alma al cuerpo?», en: Revista de Filosofía, 4, 7-60.
• Bassen, P. (1982). «Present Sakes and Future Prospects: The Status of Early Abortion», en: Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11, 4, 314-337.
• Bearak, J. (2020). Popinchalk, Anna, Ganatra, Bela, Moller, Ann-Beth, Tunçalp, Özge, Beavin, Cynthia, et al., «Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019», en: The Lancet, 8, 9, e1152-e1161, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6
• Beckwith, F. J. (1992). «Personal bodily rights, abortion, and unplugging the violinist», en: International Philosopihical Quarterly, 32,1, 105-118.
• Beckwith, F. J. (2005). Defending Life. Cambridge: CUP.
• Beckwith, F. J. (2004). «Thomson’s equal reasonableness argument for abortion rights: A critique», en: American Journal of Jurisprudence, 49,1, 185-198, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/49.1.185
• Beckwith, F. J. (2006). «Defending Abortion Philosophically: A Review of David Boonin’s “A Defense of Abortion”», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31,2, 177-203, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310600588723
• Berkich, D. (2007). «A Fallacy in potentiality», en: Dialogue, XLVI, 137-150, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300001591
• Bermúdez, J. L. (2007). «Thinking without words: An overview for animal ethics», en: Journal of Ethics, 11,3, 319-335, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-007-9013-8
• Boonin, D. (2003). A Defense of Abortion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brody, B. (1975). Abortion and the Sanctity of Human Life: A Philosophical View. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Bueno, G. (1996). «Lectura tercera: Individuo y persona», en: El sentido de la vida, seis lecturas de filosofía moral, Pentalfa, Oviedo, pp.115 -237.
• Bueno, G. (2010). El fundamentalismo democrático. Madrid: Temas de Hoy.
• Busdygan, D. (2013). Sobre la despenalización del aborto. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
• Brown, M. T. (2007). «The potential of human embryo», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32, 6, 585-618.
• Byrne, P. (1988). «The animation. Tradition in the light of contemporary philosophy», en: G. R. Dustan y M. J. Seller, The Status of the Human Embryo: Perspectives from Moral Tradition. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 86-110.
• Camosy, Ch. C. (2008). «Common Ground on Surgical Abortion? Engaging Peter Singer on the Moral Status of Potential Persons» en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33,6, 577-593, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn032
• Carrier, L. S. (1975). «Abortion and the right to life», en: Social Theory and Practice, 3,4, 281-401.
• Ciccone, L. (2003). Bioética. Historia. Principios, Cuestiones. Madrid: Ediciones Palabra.
• Congregación para la Doctrina de la Fe (1974). Declaración sobre el aborto, Ciudad del Vaticano.
• Connery, J. R. (1977). Abortion, the Development of the Roman Catholic Perspective. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
• Damschen, G., Gómez-Lobo, A., Schönecker, D. (2006). «Sixteen days? A reply to B. Smith and B. Brogaard on the beginning of human individuals», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31, 165-175, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310600588707
• Davis, Evan G. (2012). It’s a Girl: The Three Deadliest Words in the World (documental). London: Shadowline Films.
• Davis, N. (1993). «The abortion debate: The search for common ground, parts 1 and 2», en: Ethics, 103, 516-539, part 2, Ethics 103, 731-778.
• DeMarco, D. (1984). «The Roman Catholic Church and abortion: A historical perspective (I y II)», en: The Homiletic and Pastoral Review, 59-66.
• Dennett, D. (1976). «Conditions of personhood», en: Rorty, Amelie O. (ed.) The Identities of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp.175-196.
• Dunstan, G. R. (1984). «The moral status of the human embryo: a tradition recalled», en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 1, 38-44.
• Eberl, J. T. (2000). «The beginning of personhood: A Thomistic biological analysis», en: Bioethics 14, 2, 134-157, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00186
• Eberl, J. T. y Brandon P. B. (2011). «Brain life and the argument from potential: affirming the ontological status of human embryos and fetuses», en: Philosophy and Medicine, 111,1, 43-65, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1602-5_
• Engelhardt, H. T. (1974). «The ontology of abortion», en: Ethics, 84, 3, 1974, 217-234.
• Engelhardt, H. T. (1993). «Personhood, moral strangers, and the evil of abortion: The painful experience of post-modernity», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 18,4, 419-421.
• Feinberg, J. (1992). «Abortion», en: Freedom and Fulfillment, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp.37-75.
• Finnis, J. (1973): «The rights and wrongs on abortion: A reply to Judith Thomson», en: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 2, 117-145.
• Flower, M. J. (1985). «Neuromaturation and the human fetus», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 10, 3, 237-51.
• Ford, N. M. (1988). When did I Begin? Conception of the Human Individual in History, Philosophy and Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Francione, G. L. (1995). «Abortion and animal rights: Are they comparable issues?», en: Adams, C y Donovan J. (eds.), Animals and Women. Durham: Duke University Press, pp.149-159.
• Francione, G. L. (2006). «Taking sentience seriously», en: Journal of Animal Law and Ethics, 1, 1-18, doi: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839424629.249
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). El cerebro ético. Barcelona: Paidós, Barcelona.
• George, R. P. (2002). «Statement of Professor George (joined by Dr. Gómez-Lobo)», en: President’s council on Bioethics: Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry, pp. 258-266.
• George, R. P., Lee, P. (2005). «Acorns and Embryos», en: The New Atlantis, 90-100.
• George, R. P. y Tollefsen (2008). Embryo: A Defense of Human Life. New York: Doubleday.
• Gillespie, N. (1984). «Abortion and human rights», en J. Feiberg (ed.), The Problem of Abortion, Belmont: Wadsworth, Belmont, pp.94-102.
• Gillon, R. (2001). «Is there a “new ethics of abortion”?» en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 1, 27, 115-119, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.suppl_2.ii5
• Giubilini A. y Minerva, F. (2013). «After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?» en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 5, 261-263, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
• Goldenring, J. M. (1985). «The brain-life theory: towards a consistent biological definition of humanness», en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 198-204.
• Gómez-Lobo, A. (2005). «On potentiality and respect for embryos», Journal of Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, en: 26, 105-110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-1235-9
• Gracia, D. (1993). «Problemas filosóficos en genética y en embriología», en: Frances Abel y Camino Cañón (eds.), La mediación de la filosofía en la construcción de la bioética, Universidad Pontificia de Comillas, Madrid, pp. 217-254.
• Grobstein, C. (1998). Science and the Unborn. New York: Basic Books.
• Guenin, L. M. (2006). «The noninidividuation argument against zygotic personhood», en: Philosophy 81, 463-503, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819106317044
• Haldane, J. y Lee, P. (2003). «Aquinas on human ensoulment, abortion and the value of life», en: Philosophy, 78, 304, 2003, 255-278, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819103000275
• Hare, R. M. (1975). «Abortion and the golden rule», en: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4, 3, 201-222.
• Harrison, B. W. (1983). Our Right to Choose: Toward a New Ethic of Abortion. Boston Mass.: Beacon.
• Howsepian, A. A. (1992): «Who or what are we?» en: Review of Metaphysics, 45, 483-502.
• Howsepian, A. A. (1997). «Lockwood on human identity and the primitive streak», en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 23, 38-41.
• Howsepian, A. A. (2008). «Four queries concerning the metaphysics of early human embryogenesis», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33, 2, 140-157, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn001
• Hughes, J. C. (2001). «Views of the person with dementia», en: Journal of Medical Ethics 27, 86-91.
• Hurtshouse, R. (1991). «Virtue theory and abortion», en: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, 3, 223-246.
• Jaggar, A. M. (1992). «Feminist Ethics», en L. Becker (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: Garland, pp. 364-367.
• Jokic, A. (1993). «Why potentiality cannot matter», en: Journal of Social Philosophy, 24, 3, 177-193.
• Kant, I. (2005). La Metafísica de las Costumbres [1797]. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Koch-Hersenov, R. (2006). «Totipotency, twining, and ensoulment at fertilization», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31, 139-164, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310600588673
• Langer, R. (1992). «Abortion and the right to privacy», en: Journal of Social Philosophy, 23, 2, 23-51.
• Langer, R. (1993). «Silverstein and the “responsability objection”», en: Social Theory and Practice, 19, 3, 345-358.
• Larmer, R. (1995). «Abortion, personhood and the potential for consciousness», en: Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, 3, 241-251.
• Lee, P. (2004). «The pro-life argument from substantial identity: A defence», en: Bioethics, 18, 3, 249-263, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00393.x
• Lee, P., y George, R. P. (2006). «The first fourteen days of human life», en: The New Atlantis, 61-67.
• Lejeune, J. (1981). «When does human life begin? Declaration given before a U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Separation of Powers» S-158, 97th Congress, 1st session(on-line).
• Li, H.-L. (1997). «Abortion and degrees of personhood», en: Public Affairs Quarterly, 11, 1, 1-19.
• Little, M. O. (1999). «Intimacy and the duty to gestate», en: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2, 3, 295-312.
• Lockwood, M. (1985). «When does a life begin?» en: M. Lockwood (Ed.), Moral Dilemmas in Modern Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 9-31.
• Lockwood, M. (1985). «Human identity and the primitive streak», en: Hastings Center Report, 25, 1, 45.
• Marquis, D. (1989). «Why abortion is immoral», en: The Journal of Philosophy, 84, 4, 183-202.
• Marquis, D. (2007). «Abortion revisited», en: The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 395-415.
• McCormick, R. A. (1991). «Who or what is the preembryo?» en: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1, 1, 1-15.
• McDaniel, I. (2015). «The responsibility objection to abortion: rejecting the notion that the responsibility objection successfully refutes woman’s right to choose», en: Bioethics, 29, 4, 291-9, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12097
• McDonagh, E. (1996)., Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• McInerney, P. K. (1990). «Does a fetus already have a future-like-ours?» en: The Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5, 264-268.
• McMahan, J. (2007). «Infanticide», en: Utilitas, 19, 131-159, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820807002440
• Merritt John L., y Merritt II, J. L. (2010). «When Does Human Life Begin?» Scientifical, Scriptural and Historical Evidence Supports Implantation. Kemore, Washington: Crystal Clear Books.
• Montague, P. (2011). «Stem cell research and the problem of embryonic identity», en: Journal of Ethics, 15, 307-319, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-011-9107-1
• Morowitz, H. y Trefill, J. (1992). The Facts of Life: Science and the Abortion Controversy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Morris, J. (2012). «Substance ontology cannot determine the moral status of embryos», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 37, 4, 325-330, doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs026
• Munthe, Ch. (2001). «Divisibility and the moral status of embryos», en: Bioethics, 15, 5-6, 382-397, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00249
• Nathanson, B. (1983). Abortion Papers: Inside the Abortion Mentality. New York: F. Fell Publishers.
• Palmer, C. (2010). Animal Ethics in Context. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Palmer, C. (2011). «The moral relevance of the distinction between domesticated and wild animals», en: The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 701-725.
• Pasnau, R. (2001): Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Penner, P. S. y Hull, R. T. (2008). «The beginning of individual human personhood», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33, 2, 174-182, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn003
• Protopapadakis, E. (2012). «A cool hand on my feverish forehead: An even better Samaritan and the ethics of abortion», en: Philosophy Study, 2, 2, 115-123.
• Pruss, A. R. (2002). «I was once a fetus: That is why abortion is wrong», en: Life and Learning, 12, 169-82.
• Reader, S. (2008). «Abortion, killing, and maternal moral authority», en: Hipatia, 22, 1, 132-149, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01169.x
• Renfree, M. B. (1982). «Implantation and placentation», en Austin C. R. and Short, R. E. (eds.), Reproduction in Mammals v.2: Embryonic and Fetal Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26-69.
• Rini, R. A. (2013). «Of course the baby should live: Against “after-birth” abortion», en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 353-356, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100640
• Rollin, B. (1981). Animal rights and Human Morality. New York: Prometheus Books.
• Sandel, M. J. (2004). «Embryoethics. The moral logic of stem-cell research», en: The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 3, 207-9, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp048145
• Savage, M. (1988). «The laws of abortion in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People´s Republic of China: Women’s rights in two socialist countries», en: Stanford Law Review, 40, 4, 1027-1117.
• Schwartz, S. (1990). Moral Questions of Abortion. Chicago Loyola University Press.
• Sekaleshfar, F. B. (2009). «Reinterpreting the “quickening” perspective in the abortion debate», en: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30, 161-171, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9102-8
• Shannon, T. A. y Wolter, A. B. (1990). «Reflections on the moral status of the pre-embryo», en: Theological Studies, 51, 4, 603-26.
• Silverstein, H. (1987). «On woman’s responsability for the fetus», en: Social Theory and Practice, 13, 1, 103-119.
• Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Singer, P. (1994). Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of our Traditional Ethics. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
• Smith, B. y Brogaard, B. (2003). «Sixteen days», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 10, 253-266, https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.28.1.45.14172
• Steinbock, B. (1992). Life before Birth. The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Steinbock, B. (2007). «Moral status, moral value, and human embryos: implications for stem cell research», en: The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 416-440.
• Steiner, G. (2008). Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship. New Yor: Columbia University Press.
• Stier, M. (2018). «Potentiality in Bioethics», en K. Engelhard and M. Quante (Eds.), Handbook of Potentiality. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 327-350.
• Stone, J. (1987). «Why potentiality matters», en: Journal of Social Philosophy, 26, 815-830.
• Strong, C. y Anderson, G. (1989). «The moral status of near-term fetus», en: Journal of Medical Ethics, 15, 25-27.
• Suaudeau, J. (2001). «Las raíces comunes de la píldora anticonceptiva y del aborto», en: Cuadernos de Bioética, 2, 194-211.
• Sumner, L. W. (1974). «Toward a credible view of abortion», en: Canadian Journal of Philosophy, iv, 1, 163-181.
• Sumner, L. W. (1981). Abortion and Moral Theory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Tauer, C. A. (1997). «Embryo research and public policy: A philosopher’s appraisal», en: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 22, 423-439.
• Thomson, J. J. (1971). «A defense of abortion», en: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 1, 47.
• Tomás de Aquino (2008). Comentario al libro de las sentencias [1252]. Pamplona: EUNSA.
• Tomás de Aquino (1953). Suma Teológica [1265-1274]. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.
• Tooley, M. (1972).«Abortion and Infanticide», en: Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2, 1, 37-65.
• Tribe, L. H. (1990). Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton.
• Tushnet, M. y Seidman, L. M. (1986). «A comment on Tooley’s “Abortion and infanticide”», en: Ethics, 96, 2, 350-355.
• Uleman, J. K. (2000). «On Kant, infanticide, and finding oneself in a state of nature», en: Zeitschrift für philosopphische Forschung, 54, 2, 173-195.
• Vila-Coro, M. D. (2007). La bioética en la encrucijada. Sexualidad. Aborto. Eutanasia. Madrid: Dykinson.
• Warnock Commission (1984). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: HMSO.
• Warren, M. A. (1972). «On the moral and legal status of abortion», en: The Monist, 57, 1, 43-67.
• Warren, M. A. (1978). «Do potential people have moral rights?» en: R. Sikora and B. Barry (eds.), Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press, pp. 14-30.
• Warren, M. A. (1989). «The moral significance of birth», en: Hipatia, 4, 46-65.
• Warren, M. A. (2000). «The moral difference between infanticide and abortion: A Response to Robert Card», en: Bioethics, 14, 352-359 doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00202
• Wreen, M. J. (1986). «The power of potentiality», en: Theoria, 1, 2, 16-41.