Pandemias e infodemiasdesinformación en tiempos postnormales

  1. Laspra Pérez, Belén 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

ISSN: 0210-1963

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 198

Número: 806

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/ARBOR.2022.806001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aghababaeian, Hamidreza, Hamdanieha, Lara y Ostadtaghizadeha Abbas (2020). Alcohol intake in an attempt to fight COVID-19: A medical myth in Iran. Alcohol, 88, 29-32.
  • Ajzen, Icek (2012). The theory of planned behavior. En Paul A.M. Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski y E.Tory Higgins (eds.) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 438-459). London: SAGE.
  • Bauer, Martin W.; Allum, Nick y Miller, Steve (2007). What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 79-95.
  • Bauer, Martin, W.; Pangsegrau, Petra y Shukla, Rajesh (2019). The Cultural Authority of Science. Comparing across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. Routledge.
  • Bucchi, Massimiano (2008). Of deficits, deviations and dialogues. Theories of public communication of science. En Massimiano Bucchi y Brian Trench (eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp.57-76). London-New York: Routledge.
  • Comisión Europea (2000). Commission adopts Communication on Precautionary Principle. IP/00/96. Bruselas, 2 de febrero de 2000. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_00_96
  • Cialdini, Robert B. (1984). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Nueva York: William Morroy e Company.
  • Cinelli, Mateo; Morales, Gianmarco de Francisci; Galeazzi, Alessandro; Quattrociocchi, Walter y Starnini, Michele (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. PNAS, 111 (9).
  • Echeverría, Javier y Almendros, Lola (2020). Tecnopersonas. Cómo las tecnologías nos transforman. España: Trea.
  • Funtowicz, Silvio e Hidalgo, Cecilia (2021). Pandemia posnormal: las múltiples voces del conocimiento. Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global¸154, 109-122.
  • Funtowicz, Silvio y Ravetz, Jerome (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 31(7), 735-755.
  • Functowicz, Silvio, y Strand, Roger (2007). De la demostración experta al diálogo participativo. Revista CTS, 8(3), 97-113.
  • Godin, Benoit y Gingras, Yves (2000). What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 43-58.
  • Gould, George Milbry y Pyle, Walter Lytle (1896). Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine. Blacksleet River.. Proyecto Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/747
  • Kahan, Dan M. (2012a). On the sources of Ordinary Science Knowledge and extraordinary Science Ignorance. En Kathleen H. Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan y Dietram A. Scheufele (eds.), (pp. 34-49) The Oxford Handbook of the Science on Science Communication. London-New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kahan Dan M. (2012b). Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk. En Sabine Roeser, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin y Martin Peterson M (eds.), (pp. 725-759) Handbook of Risk Theory. Springer: Dordrecht.
  • Kahan, Dan M. (2017). Ordinary science intelligence’: a science-comprehension measure for study of risk and science communication, with notes on evolution and climate change. Journal of Risk Research, 20(8), 995-1016.
  • Kahan, Dan M.; Peters, Ellen; Wittlin, Maggie; Slovic, Paul; Larrimore, Lisa; Braman, Donald y Mandel, Gregory (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution. EEUU: University of Chicago Press.
  • López Cerezo, José Antonio (2018). La confianza en la sociedad del riesgo. Barcelona: Sello Editorial.
  • Miller, Jon D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20024852
  • Miller, Jon D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific lireacy. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 203-223.
  • Nickerson, Raymond S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
  • Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth (1974). The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51.
  • OMS, (2013). Pandemic Influenza Risk Management WHO Interim Guidance. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/influenza/preparedness/pandemic/GIP_PandemicInfluenzaRiskManagementInterimGuidance_Jun2013.pdf.
  • Plous, Scott (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. EEUU: McGraw-Hill.
  • Scheufele, Dietram, A. y Moy, Patricia (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3-28.