Soft gender diversity regulations for boards of directorsthe moderating role of firm ownership and control structure

  1. Irma Martínez-García 1
  2. María Sacristán-Navarro 2
  3. Silvia Gómez-Ansón 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, España
  2. 2 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos I
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 52

Número: 1

Páginas: 93-124

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2022.2066346 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Resumen

Women are significantly underrepresented worldwide on corporate boards of directors, leading to board gender diversity regulations. Drawing from agency and socioemotional wealth theories, we investigate the moderating effect of ownership structure, shareholder identity and shareholder control on how gender diversity codes and soft quotas influence women’s representation on boards. We analyse our sample of Spanish Stock Exchange firms using panel data Tobit models. The results show that a single large shareholder enhances the positive impact of regulations, while multiple blockholders diminish it. Blockholder identity also matters: family control of board seats and families as the sole large shareholders reduce the positive impact of board gender diversity regulations on women’s board representation. In family firms, the balance of power between family and non-family shareholders also affects the impact of regulations. Our findings highlight the need to consider firm ownership and control structure when developing regulations to promote board gender diversity.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2008.10.007
  • Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
  • Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Lucas-Pérez, M. E., Martín-Ugedo, J. F., Minguez-Vera, A., & Sanchez-Marin, G. (2016). Executive directors’ compensation and monitoring: The influence of gender diversity on Spanish boards. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(6), 1133–1154. https:// doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2014.969767
  • Bennedsen, M., & Wolfenzon, D. (2000). The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00) 00068-4
  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
  • Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23 (2), 129–144. https:// doi.org/10.1111/corg.12097
  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primate theory of social structure. Free Press.
  • Bloch, F., & Hege, U. (2003). Multiple shareholders and control contests. MPRA Paper No. 42286. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42286/1/MPRA_paper_42286.pdf
  • Boateng, A., & Huang, W. (2017). Multiple large shareholders, excess leverage and tunneling: Evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(1), 58– 74. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12184
  • Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2015). Mandatory gender balance and board Independence. European Financial Management, 22 (1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12060
  • Cao, F., Peng, S., & Ye, K. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting. Emerging Markets Review, 38 (1), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.02. 004
  • Casey, C., Skibnes, R., & Pringle, J. K. (2011). Gender equality and corporate governance: Policy strategies in Norway and New Zealand. Gender, Work, and Organization, 18 (6), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00514.x
  • Chapple, L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122 (4), 709–723. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1785-0
  • CNMV. (2021). The presence of women in the board of directors and key executive positions in listed entities. https://www.cnmv.es/portal/Publicaciones/Consejeras_Directivas.aspx?lang=en
  • Collin, S.-O., & Ahlberg, J. (2012). Blood in the boardroom: Family relationships influencing the functions of the board. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3 (4), 207–219. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jfbs.2012.11.001
  • Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., & García-Cestona, M. (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (7), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2046
  • Edmans, A. (2014). Blockholders and corporate governance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6 (1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19573
  • European Corporate Governance Institute. (2021). Governance codes. https://ecgi.global/content/ codes European Parliament. (2021). Legislative train schedule, area of justice and fundamental rights, gender balance on boards. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-area-of- justice-and-fundamental-rights/file-gender-balance-on-boards
  • European Women on Boards. (2019). European women on boards gender diversity index. https:// europeanwomenonboards.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Gender-Equality-Index-Final- report-vDEF-ter.pdf
  • Fang, Y., Hu, M., & Yang, Q. (2018). Do executives benefit from shareholder disputes? Evidence from multiple large shareholders in Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 51(1), 275–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.06.008
  • Ferrari, G., Ferraro, V., Profeta, P., & Pronzato, C. (2018). Do board gender quotas matter? Selection, performance and stock market effects. IZA Discussion Paper, Article 11462. https:// ftp.iza.org/dp11462.pdf
  • García-Ramos, R., Díaz-Díaz, B., & García-Olalla, M. (2017). Independent directors, large share-holders and firm performance: The generational stage of family businesses and the socio-emotional wealth approach. Review of Managerial Science, 11 (1), 119–156. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11846-015-0182-8
  • González-Menéndez, M. C., & Martínez-González, L. (2012). Spain on the Norwegian -pathway: Towards a gender-balanced presence of women on corporate boards. In C. Fagan, M. C. González-Menéndez, & S. Gómez-Ansón (Eds.), Women on corporate boards and in elite management: European trends and policy (pp. 169–197). Palgrave McMillan.
  • Grosvold, J., Rayton, B., & Brammer, S. (2016). Women on corporate boards: A comparative institutional analysis. Business & Society, 55 (8), 1157–1196. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ abs/10.1177/0007650315613980
  • Jara-Bertín, M., López-Iturriaga, F. J., & López-de-foronda, O. (2008). The contest to the control in European family firms: How other shareholders affect firm value. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (3), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00677.x 122I.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  • Kang, J. K., Luo, J., & Seung, H. (2018). Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors? Journal of Financial Economics, 128 (3), 576–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jfineco.2018.03.005
  • Kirsch, A. (2018). The gender composition of corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 29 (2), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.001
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
  • Lending, C. C., & Vähämaa, E. (2017). European board structure and director expertise: The impact of quotas. Research in International Business and Finance, 39 (A), 486–501. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.004
  • Lombardo, E., & Verge, T. (2017). Cuotas de género en política y economía. Regulación y configuración institucional en España [Gender Quotas in Politics and Corporate Boards: Regulation and Institutional Configuration in Spain]. Política y Gobierno, 24 (2), 301–331. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-20372017000200301
  • Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm performance and women on the board: Evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist Economics, 20 (3), 136– 162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
  • Martínez-García, I., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2021). Regulación de género en los consejos de administración: El papel moderador del entorno institucional [Gender regulation in boards of directors: The moderating role of the institutional framework]. (January 19, 2021). CNMV Working Paper No. 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3769238
  • Martínez-García, I., Sacristán-Navarro, M., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2020). Diversidad de género en los consejos de administración: El efecto de la normativa en la presencia de mujeres en las empresas españolas cotizadas [Gender Diversity on Boards of Directors:The Influence of Regulation on Women Presence in Corporate Governance of Spanish Listed Firms]. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Comunicación aDResearch ESIC, 22 (22), 60–81. https://doi. org/10.7263/adresic-022-03
  • Martínez-García, I., Terjesen, S., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2022). Board gender diversity codes, quotas, and threats of supranational legislation: Impact on director characteristics and corporate outcomes. British Journal of Management, 33 (2), 753–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551. 12517
  • Mateos de Cabo, R., Terjesen, S., Escot, L., & Gimeno, R. (2019). Do ‘soft law’ board gender quotas work? Evidence from a natural experiment. European Management Review, 37(5), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.004
  • Mateu de Ros, R., & Vidal, C. (2019, June). Corporate governance in Spain. Lexology, https://www.lexology.com/gtdt/tool/workareas/report/corporate-governance/chapter/spain
  • Palá-Laguna, R., & Esteban-Salvador, L. (2016). Gender quota for boards of corporations in Spain. European Business Organization Law Review, 17 (3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804- 016-0047-x
  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Pindado, J., Requejo, I., & de la Torre, C. (2011). Family control and investment–cash flow sensitivity: Empirical evidence from the Euro zone. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17 (1), 1389–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.07.003
  • Poletti-Hughes, J., & Birano-Turrent, B. (2022). Leverage in family firms: The moderating role of female directors and board quality. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27 (1), 207– 223. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2147
  • Prowse, S. (1997). Corporate control in commercial banks. Journal of Financial Research, 20(4), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229150
  • Rebérioux, A., & Roudaut, G. (2016). Gender quota and inequalities inside the boardroom. CEPREMAP, Article 1603. http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/docweb/docweb1603.pdf
  • Reguera-Alvarado, N., de Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9
  • Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non-family business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26 (2), 167–174. https://doi. org/10.1111/beer.12140
  • Rossi, F., Barth, J. R., & Cebula, R. J. (2018). Do shareholder coalitions affect agency costs? Evidence from Italian-listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 46 (1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.02.002
  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., Cabeza-García, L., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2015). The company you keep: The effect of other large shareholders in family firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23 (3), 216–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/corg.12107
  • Sacristán-Navarro, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., & Cabeza-García, L. (2013). Other large shareholders in family firms: Do they monitor? In P. Poutzirouris, K. Smyrnios, & S. Goel (Eds.), Handbook of research on family business (2nd ed., pp. 161–183). Edward Elgar Publishers.
  • Sanchez-Marin, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Pérez, M. E. (2010). When much is not better? Top management compensation, board structure, and performance in Spanish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(15), 2778–2797. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09585192.2010.528660
  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4), 623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  • Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., Wood, S. A., & Wheeler, M. A. (2016). Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27 (3), 519–536 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.003 .
  • Solimene, S., Coluccia, D., & Fontana, S. (2017). Gender diversity on corporate boards: An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies. Palgrave Communications, 3 (1), 16109. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.109 .
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
  • Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2008). How are U.S. family firms controlled? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3047–3091. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn080
  • Wang, M., & Kelan, E. (2013). The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 117 (3), 449–466. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-012-1546-5
  • Willey, K. (2017). ‘Bringing Canadian women on boards’: A behavioural economics perspective on whether public reporting of gender diversity will alter the male-dominated composition of Canadian public company boards and senior management. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 29 (1), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.29.1.182
  • World Economic Forum. (2020). The global gender gap reports. https://www.weforum.org/reports/ gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
  • Zwiebel, J. (1995). Corporate conservatism and relative compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 103 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/261973124I.