The adaptation process in port governance: the case of the Latin countries in South America and Europe

  1. González Laxe, Fernando
  2. Sánchez, Ricardo J.
  3. Garcia-Alonso, Lorena 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Aldizkaria:
Journal of Shipping and Trade

ISSN: 2364-4575

Argitalpen urtea: 2016

Alea: 1

Zenbakia: 1

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1186/S41072-016-0018-Y GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Journal of Shipping and Trade

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

The particular location of port infrastructure holds characteristics that determine the activity of the port, both with respect to traffic and with respect to implementing competitive strategies; and the efficiency and efficacy of infrastructure depend on the governance systems that regulate the ports. Likewise, the development of port activity echoes in the regional economy as well, hence governance becomes integral to maximizing the impact of ports on their region’s economic development. However, the activity of a port transcends the domestic/regional frontiers, as long as the port intends to take part in a global supply chain. Achieving this aim poses a challenge on the authorities that govern port activity, and this challenge needs to be seized when it comes to adjusting the governance to external and internal goals.In the specific case of the analysed ports, the prevailing governance model is known as Landlord, which differs noticeably from port to port. These differences make it possible to distinguish the orientation of European ports from that of the analysed Latin American ports, showing a dissimilar adjustment of the conception of governance that followed objectives that were not simultaneous. The paper draws forth a questioning of the uniqueness of the denomination Landlord and its legitimacy given the new challenges. Furthermore, the paper opens the way to understanding the need to adapt governance to changes, given the examined experiences. The analysis covers the following cases: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, France, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

€ Ikusi finantzaketa

Finantzaketari buruzko informazioa

Finantzatzaile

  • Gobierno de España
    • MTM2011-23205

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Baird AJ (2000). Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process and the U.K. experience. Int J Maritime Econ 2(3):177–194
  • Baltazar R, Brooks MR (2001) The Devolution of Port Management: A Tale of Two Countries, presented at the World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul, July
  • Baltazar R, Brooks MR (2007) Port governance, devolution and matching framework: a configuration theory approach. In: Devolution, port governance and port performance. Research in transportation economics, vol Chapter 17., pp 379–403
  • Borges Vieira GB et al (2014) Port governance model by Managers’ and Customers’ point of view: a study at port of Valencia, Spain. Int Bus Res 7(8):1–16
  • Brooks MR (2004) The governance structure of ports. Rev Netw Econ 3(2):168–183
  • Brooks MR, Cullinane K (2007) Governance models defined. In: Brooks MR, Cullinane K (eds) Research in transportation economics, vol 17. The Netherlands, Elsevier, pp 405–435
  • Brooks MR, Pallis AA (2008) Assessing port governance models: process and performance components. Marti Policy Manag 35(4):411–432
  • CEPAL (2015) Perfil marítimo y logístico de América Latina y el Caribe. Available at: http://www.cepal.org/perfil/ . Accessed 2 Oct 2015
  • Cullinane K, Song D (2002) Port privatization policy and practice. Transp Rev 22(1):55–75
  • Debrie J, Lavaud-Letilleul V, Parola F (2013) Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform. J Transp Geogr 27:56–65
  • Debrie J (2010) Different tiers of government in port governance: some general remarks on the institutional geography of ports in Europe and Canada. World Conference on Transport Research Society, 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbonne, p 16
  • De Langen (2007) Stakeholders, conflicting interests and governance in port clusters. In: Brooks MR, Cullinane K (eds) Devolution, port governance and port performance. Research in transportation economics, vol 17. The Netherlands, Elsevier, pp 457–476
  • Drewe P, Janssen B (1996). What ports for the future? From “main ports” to ports as nodes of logistics networks. European Regional Science Association. 36 th European Congress, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. 26-30 August 1996
  • Ferrari C, Parola F, Tei A (2015) Governance models and port concessions in Europe: commonalities, critical issues and policy perspectives. Transp Policy 41(0):60–67
  • Geiger A (2011) Modelo de governança para apoiar a inserção competitiva de arranjos produtivos locais em cadeias globais de valor. Phd Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande so Sul. Escola de Engenharia. Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Engenharia de Produçap.
  • González Laxe F (2008) Gobernanza portuaria: principales trayectorias. Rev Econ Mundial 18:355–368
  • González-Laxe F (2013) Experiencias internacionales sobre el rol del estado para el desarrollo de sistemas portuarios en ambientes de competencias. Documento de trabajo de la División de Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura (DRNI) de CEPAL. Santiago, Chile
  • Lam JSL, Ng AKY, Fu X (2013) Stakeholder management for establishing sustainable regional port governance. Res Transp Bus Manag 8:30–38
  • Monios J (2015) Identifying governance relationships between intermodal terminals and logistics platforms. Transp Rev 35(6):767–791
  • Ng AKY, Pallis AA (2010) Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environ Plan A 42(9):2147–2167
  • Notteboom T (2007) Concession agreements as port governance tools. In: Brooks MR, Cullinane K (eds) Devolution, port governance and port performance. Research in transportation economics, vol 17. The Netherlands, Elsevier, pp 437–455
  • Pallis AA (2007). EU Port Policy: Implications for Port Governance in Europe. In: Devolution, port governance and port performance. Research in Transportation Economics. vol 17. pp 479–495
  • Sanchez RJ, Pinto F (2015) El gran desafío para los puertos: la hora de pensar una nueva gobernanza portuaria ha llegado. Boletín FAL, Facilitación del transporte y el comercio en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL, Naciones Unidas. 337 (1)
  • Stoker G (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(155):17–28
  • Talley WK (2009) Port Economics. Routledge, Oxon
  • UNCTAD (1992) Development and improvement of ports: the principles of modern port management and organization. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Trade and Development Board, Committee on Shipping, Ad hoc Intergovernmental Group of Port Experts, Geneva
  • Vanoutrive T (2012) The changing spatiality of port governance: the case of Antwerp. 52th Conference of the European Regional Science Association. 21 to 25 August, Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Verhoeven P (2009) European ports policy: meeting contemporary governance challenges. Marit Policy Manag 36(1):79–101
  • Verhoeven P (2011) European Port Governance. Brussel
  • Verhoeven P, Vanoutrive T (2012) A quantitative analysis of European port governance. Mar Econ Logist 14(2):178–203
  • World Bank (2007) Port Reform Toolkit. Second Edition. Pub. The Interantional Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC