Escuelas coherentesvalidez de contenido de una rúbrica para evaluar centros desde la visión del profesorado

  1. Rodríguez Olay, Lucía 1
  2. Muñoz San Roque, Isabel 2
  3. Santaolalla Pascual, Elsa 2
  4. Martín Carrasquilla, Olga 2
  5. Soria Martínez, Arántzazu 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad Pontificia Comillas
    info

    Universidad Pontificia Comillas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/017mdc710

  3. 3 Junta de Castilla y León
    info

    Junta de Castilla y León

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02s8dab97

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Miscelánea Comillas: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales

ISSN: 0210-9522,  2341-085X

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Zenbakien izenburua: July-December

Alea: 80

Zenbakia: 157

Orrialdeak: 319-341

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.14422/MIS.V80.I157.Y2022.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Miscelánea Comillas: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

The aim of this article is to analyse the content validity of an instrument in rubric format to be completed by teachers to measure key performance indicators in schools following the coherent schools approach. During the process of designing and validating the content of the instrument, the complexity of a concept that encompasses multiple dimensions, not only of the school, but also of the entire school community, was noted. This has led researchers to highlight the relationships between the various elements that make up a school and, in this way, the existing connections between the academic, socio-economic and personal aspects that interact with each other have also been determined. The results of the evaluation of the instrument created show that the number of questions included needs to be reduced either because they are not relevant or because they are not clear. The instrument can be useful to those institutions who are interested in measuring different standards that can lead to their improvement and in determining their degree of coherence, so that they can apply the instrument and obtain results that contribute to determining future strategies.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Boyer, R. (1985). States against markets: the limits of globalization. Routledge.
  • Buchman, M., & Floden, R. E. (1991). Programme coherence in teacher education: A view from the USA. Oxford Review of Education, 17(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498910170105
  • Buzan, T. (2013). Cómo crear mapas mentales: utiliza al máximo la capacidad de tu mente. Ediciones Urano.
  • Canrinus, E. T., Bergem, O. K., Klette, K., & Hammerness, K. (2015). Coherent teacher education programmes: Taking a student perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1124145
  • Coleman, J. (1977). Parents, Teachers, and Children: Prospects for Choice in American Education. Institute for Contemporary Studies.
  • Delors, J., Mufti, I., Amagi, I., Carneiro, R., Chung, F., Geremek, B., Gorham, W., Kornhauser, A., Manley, M., Padrón-Quero, M., Savané, M. A., Singh, K., Stavenhagen, R., Won-Suhr, M. y Nanzhao, Z. (2000). La educación encierra un tesoro. https://bit.ly/3B1AZeU
  • Ernest, L. (1985). High School: A Report on Secondary Education in America. Harper Collins.
  • Fullan, M., & Kirtman, L. (2019). Coherent school leadership. Forging clarity from complexity. ASCD.
  • Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence. The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts, and Systems. Thousand Oaks, Corwin.
  • Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & Adam, E. (2016). The taking action guide to building coherence in schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, Corwin.
  • Goh, P. S., & Yusuf, Q. (2017). Validation of the Malaysian Version of the Teacher Education Program Coherence Questionnaire. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n12.3
  • Gonçalves, D. y Almeida, S. (2016). Learning and teaching using digital books: Opportunities and Constraints. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 20(1), 49-60. https://bit.ly/3sEpK8H
  • Grant, G. (1988). The World We Created at Hamilton High. Harvard University Press.
  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., McDonald, M., & Ronfeldt, M. (2008). Constructing coherence: Structural predictors of perceptions of coherence in NYC teacher education programmes. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322127
  • Hammerness, K. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teacher College Record, 108(1), 1241-1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x
  • Hammerness, K. (2013). Examining features of teacher education in Norway: Looking for vision, coherence and connections to practice. The Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 400-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656285
  • Hill, P. T., Maas, T. (2015). The Case for Coherent High Schools. University of Washington Center on Reinventing Public Education.
  • Jiménez, D., González, J. J. & Tornel, M. (2020). Metodologías activas en la universidad y su relación con los enfoques de enseñanza. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 24(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8173
  • Johnson, L., Adams, S. (2011). Challenge Based Learning: the report from the implementation project. The New Media Consortium. https://bit.ly/3ur0Xr3
  • López-Gómez, E. (2018). El método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XX1, 21(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.20169
  • Lores, B., Sánchez, P. y García, M. R. (2019). La formación de la competencia digital en los docentes. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(4), 234-260. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i4.11720
  • Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools? Translating research into action. Alexandria, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., Heflebower, T. (2011). The Highly Engaged Classroom. Bloomington, Marzano Research.
  • Morón, H., Morón, M. C. y Abril, D. (2020). La rúbrica como instrumento para evaluar mapas conceptuales desde la construcción creativa de los conocimientos: Una propuesta participativa. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 24(1), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.8514
  • Newmann, F., Smith, B., Allensworth, E. & Bryk, A. (2001). Instructional Program Coherence: What It Is and Why It Should Guide School Improvement Policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297
  • Nixon, J. (1991). Reclaiming coherence: Cross-curriculum provision and the National Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230209
  • Oakes, J (1985). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. Yale University.
  • Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (UNESCO) (2015). Marco de acción para la realización del Objetivo de Desarrollo Sostenible 4: Garantizar una educación inclusiva, equitativa y de calidad y promover oportunidades de aprendizaje durante toda la vida para todos. https://bit.ly/3gpqf0s
  • Páramo-Iglesias, M. B., Martínez-Figueira, M. E. & Raposo, M. (2017). CAAP-AP: Un cuestionario para evaluar la práctica docente a favor de la atención y planificación en Educación Infantil. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 21(2), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v21i2.10328
  • Perlado, I., Muñoz, Y., Torrego, J. (2019). Implicaciones de la formación del profesorado en aprendizaje cooperativo para la educación inclusiva. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(4), 128-151. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i4.9468
  • Pineida, F. (2011). Competencies for the 21st Century: Integrating ICT to Life, School and Economical Development. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.011
  • Powell, A., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. (1985). The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Pritchett, L. (2015). Creating Education Systems Coherent for Learning Outcomes: Making the Transition from Schooling to Learning. RISE Working Paper Series.15/005. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2015/005
  • Robinson, V. M. J., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why, Best Evidence Synthesis. Ministry of Education.
  • Rodríguez, G. (2016). Análisis teórico-reflexivo sobre los factores que intervienen en la calidad de los aprendizajes y práctica docente: Theoretical y reflective analysis of the factors affecting the quality of learning y teaching practice. Gestión De La Educación, 6(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.15517/rge.v1i1.22723
  • Russell, T., McPherson, S., & Martin, A.K. (2001). Coherence and collaboration in teacher education reform. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602144
  • Scott, C. (2015). ¿Qué tipo de aprendizaje se necesita en el siglo XXI?.UNESCO
  • Sizer, T.R. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the american high school. Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263658406847527
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific, y Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2007). Summary of the budget: 32 C/5 (2004-2005). https://bit.ly/3GtQSvN
Datuen iturria: Dialnet