Teaching behaviours under observationan instrument for assessing teaching quality in Spain

Referencias bibliográficas

• André, S., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Telli, S., Chun, S., Fernández-García, C. M., De Jager, T., Irnidayanti, Y., Inda-Caro, M., Lee, O., Safrina, R., Coetzee, T., & Jeon, M. (2020). Student perceptions in measuring teaching behavior across six countries: A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis approach to measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–19.
• Blaich, C., Wise, K., Pascarella, E. T., & Roksa, J. (2016). Instructional clarity and organization: It’s not new or fancy, but it matters. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 48(4), 6–13.
• Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports No. 1). The George Washington University, School of Education and Higher Education.
• Briole, S., & Maurin, E. (2019). Does evaluating teachers make a difference? IZA Discussion Papers, 123017, 1–38.
• Cardwell, M. E. (2011). Patterns of relationships between teacher engagement and student engagement. Education Doctoral, 49, 1–125.
• Carriedo, N. (1995). Hacia la contextualización: La enseñanza de estrategias de comprensión de las ideas principales en el aula. Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación, 28(4), 123–134.
• Christensen, H., Vigild, M., Thomsen, E., Szabo, P., & Horsewell, A. (2009). Activating teaching methods, studying responses and learning. Arctic Technology Centre & Learning Lab DTU.
• Coe, R., & Merino, C. (2003). Magnitud del efecto; Una guía para investigadores y usuarios. Revista de Psicología de la PUCP, 21(1), 146–177.
• Cole, M. (1984). La zona de desarrollo próximo: Donde cultura y conocimiento se generan mutuamente. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 7(25), 3–17.
• Coll, C. (1984). Estructura grupal, interacción entre alumnos y aprendizaje escolar. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 27(28), 119–138.
• Coll, C. (1988). Significado y sentido en el aprendizaje escolar. Reflexiones en torno al concepto de aprendizaje significativo. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 11(41), 131–142.
• Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar, & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. Self-processes and development (pp. 43–77). Erlbaum.
• Consejo Escolar de Estado & Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. (2018). Informe 2018 sobre el estado del sistema educativo.
• Cubero, R., Cubero, M., Santamaría, A., Saavedra, J., & Yossef, J. J. (2007). Aprendizaje y psicología histórico-cultural. Aportaciones de una perspectiva social del aula. Investigación en la escuela, 62, 5–16.
• Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
• Danielson, C. (2012). Observing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 32–37.
• Danielson, C. (2013). Rubrics from the framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Danielson Group.
• De Jager, T. (2011). Guidelines to assist the implementation of differentiated learning activities in South African secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 80–94.
• De Jager, T., Coetzee, M.-C., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van de Grift, W. (2017). Profile of South African secondary-school teachers’ teaching quality: Evaluation of teaching practices using an observation instrument. Educational Studies, 43(4), 410–429.
• De Jong, R., & Westerhof, K. J. (2001). The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learning Environments Research, 4(1), 51–85.
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 5–18.
• Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 103–112.
• Fernández-García, C. M., Maulana, R., Inda-Caro, M., Helms-Lorenz, M., & García-Pérez, O. (2019). Student perceptions of secondary education teaching effectiveness: General profile, the role of personal factors and educational level. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–11.
• Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. National Center for Educational Statistics.
• Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
• Fritz, M., & MacKinnon, D. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 233–238.
• Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
• Gage, N. A., Scott, T., Hirn, R., & MacSuga-Gage, A. S. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ implementation of classroom management practices and student behavior in elementary school. Behavioral Disorders, 43(2), 302–315.
• García-Garrido, J. L. (2002). La nueva Ley de Calidad: Reflexiones en la perspectiva internacional. Revista de Educación, 329, 23–38.
• Gargallo, B., Pérez-Pérez, C., García-García, F. J., Giménez, J. A., & Portillo, N. (2020). La competencia aprender a aprender en la universidad: Propuesta de modelo teórico. Educación XX1, 23(1), 19–44.
• Gispert, I., & Onrubia, J. (1997). Analizando la práctica educativa con herramientas socio-culturales: Traspaso del control y aprendizaje en situaciones de aula. Cultura y Educación, 9(2/3), 105–115.
• Goodnow, J. J. (1996). Acceptable ignorance, negotiable disagreement: Alternative reviews of learning. In D. R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 345–367). Blackwell Publishers.
• Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Erlbaum.
• Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.
• Hanushek, E. A. (2016). What matters for student achievement. Education Next, 16(2), 19–26.
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2003, October). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference.
• Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10.
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512.
• Hoyt, D. P., & Pallet, W. H. (1999). Appraising teaching effectiveness: Beyond student ratings. Idea Paper, 36, 1–14.
• Inda-Caro, M., Fernández-García, C. M., Maulana, R., & Viñuela-Hernández, M. P. (2021). The effect of contextual, personal, and curricular factors on students’ engagement. Revista de Educación, 391, 181–198.
• Jensen, B., Grajeda, S., & Haertel, E. (2018). Measuring cultural dimensions of classroom interactions. Educational Assessment, 23(4), 250–276.
• Jensen, B., Wallace, T. L., Steinberg, M. P., Gabriel, R. E., Dietiker, L., Davis, D. S., Kelcey, B., Minor, E., Halpin, P., & Rui, N. (2019). Complexity and scale in teaching effectiveness research: Reflections from the MET Study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(7), 1–17.
• John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskyan framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206.
• Kelly, S., Bringe, R., Aucejo, E., & Fruehwirth, J. (2020). Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement: Strengths and emerging limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(62), 1–29.
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. O. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
• Kugel, P. (1993). How professors develop as teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 18(3), 315–328.
• Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta – Analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152.
• Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 12–23.
• Martínez-Usarralde, M. J. (2015). Spain. In W. Hörner, H. Döbert, L. R. Reuter, & B. Von Kopp (Eds.), The education systems of Europe. Second edition (pp. 759–777). Springer.
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van De Grift, W. (2015a). A longitudinal study of induction on the acceleration of growth in teaching quality of beginning teachers through the eyes of their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 225 245.
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van De Grift, W. (2015b). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre – Service teachers’ teaching behaviour: A Rasch modelling approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement; an International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 26(2), 169–194.
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van de Grift, W. (2017). Validating a model of effective teaching behaviour of pre – Service teachers. Teachers and Training. Theory and Practice, 23(4), 471–493.
• Maulana, R., & Opdenakker, M.-C. (2013). Teachers’ interpersonal involvement as a predictor of students’ academic motivation among Indonesian secondary school students: A multilevel growth curve analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 591–603.
• Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Bosker, R. (2013). Teacher–student interpersonal relationships do change and affect academic motivation: A multilevel growth curve modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 459–482.
• Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M.-C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of changeand link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 835–885.
• Mercado, R. (1991). Los saberes docentes en el trabajo cotidiano de los maestros. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 14(55), 59–72.
• Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte de España. (2016) . PISA 2015. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. Informe español.
• Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the Mathematics Enhancement Programme (Primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 273–303.
• Noben, I., Maulana, R., Deinum, J. F., & Adriaan-Hofman, W. H. (2020). Measuring university teachers’ teaching quality: A Rasch modelling approach. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 87–107.
• Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. National Comprehensive center for Teacher Quality.
• Opdenakker, M. V., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Relationships between learning environment characteristics and academic engagement. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 259–284.
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2018). PISA 2015: PISA results in focus.
• Pérez, M. (2013). La actitud indagadora del profesor: Un proceso para desarrollar competencias en los docentes. Profesorado. Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 17(3), 57–72.
• Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.
• Prado, M., & Cubero, M. (2013). Reflexionando acerca de cómo estudiar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje en el contexto natural del aula universitaria. Cultura y Educación, 25(3), 273–284.
• Puelles, M. (2008). Las grandes leyes educativas de los últimos doscientos años. Participación educativa, 7, 7–15.
• Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2014). Teacher progress monitoring of instructional and behavioral management practices: An evidence-based approach to improving classroom practices. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2(2), 71–84.
• Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. (2013). Development and construct validity of the classroom strategies scale-observer form. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(4), 317–341.
• Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712.
• Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2011). Effective schools, equity and teacher effectiveness: A review to the literature. Profesorado, Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 15(3), 9–26.
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2008). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s’ behavioural and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530.
• Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49(2), 127–152.
• Van de Grift, W. (2014). Measuring teaching quality in several European countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 25(3), 295–311.
• Van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2014). Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 150–159.
• Van de Grift, W., & Lam, J. (1998). Het didactisch handelen in het basisonderwijs. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 23(2), 224–241.
• Van der Lans, R. M., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Fernández-García, C. M., Chun, S., De Jager, T., Irnidayanti, Y., Inda-Caro, M., Lee, O., Coetzee, T., Fadhilah, N., Jeon, M., & Moorer, P. (2021). Student perceptions of teaching quality in five countries: A partial credit model approach to assess measurement invariance. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–20.
• Van der Lans, R. M., Van de Grift, W., & Van Veen, K. (2015). Developing a teacher evaluation instrument to provide formative feedback using student ratings of teaching acts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 34(3), 18–27.
• Van der Lans, R. M., Van de Grift, W., Van Veen, K., & Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. (2016). Once is not enough: Establishing reliability criteria for feedback and evaluation decision based on classroom observations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 88–95.
• Viñao, A. (2016). La Ley Orgánica de Mejora de la Calidad Educativa (LOMCE) de 2013: ¿una reforma más? Historia y Memoria de la Educación, 3(3), 137–170.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Pensamiento y lenguaje. La Pléyade.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Aprendizaje y desarrollo intelectual en la edad escolar. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 27(28), 105–116.
• Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a Knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 249–294.
• White, M. C. (2018). Rater performance standards for classroom observation measures. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 492–501.
• Woolley, M. E., & Bowen, G. (2007). In the context of risk: Supportive adults and the school engagement of middle school students. Family Relations, 56(1), 92–104.