Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bijker, W.E. (2003), The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS, Science, Technology and Human Values 28/2: 443-450.
• Bloor, D. (1976/1991), Conocimiento e imaginario social. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1998.
• Bucchi, M. y F. Neresini (2007), Science and Public Participation, en: Hackett et al. (2007), pp. 449-472.
• Callon, M. y V. Rabeharisoa (2003), Research 'in the wild' and the shaping of new social identities, Technology and Society 25: 193-204.
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumese Y. Barthe (2001), Acting in an uncertain world. An essay on technical democracy. Londres: The MIT Press, 2009.
• Carson, R. (1962), Primavera silenciosa. Barcelona: Critica, 2001.
• Collins, H. M. (1983). Un Programa Empirico de Relativismo en Sociologfa del Conocimiento Cientffico, en: Gonzalez Garcia et al. (eds.) (1997), Cienciay tecnologia y sociedad. Lecturas seleccionadas. Barcelona: Ariel.
• Cozzens, S. (2001), Making disciplines disappears en: Cutcliffe y Mitcham (2001), pp. 51-64.
• Cutcliffe, S. y C. Mitcham (eds.) (2001), Visions of STS: Counterpoints in science, technology and society studies, Nueva York: State University of New York Press.
• Fuglsang, L. (2001), Three perspectives in STS in the Policy Context, en: Cutcliffe y Mitcham (2001), pp. 35-50.
• Fuller, S. (1992), STS as a social movement: on the purpose of graduate programs, Science, Technology and Society 91: 1-15.
• Fuller, S. (2006), The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Fuller, S. (2012), CSI: Kuhn and Latour, Social Studies of Science 42/3: 429-434.
• Galison, P. y D.J. Stump (eds.) (1996), The Disunity of Science; Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Gonzalez Garcia, M.I., J.A. Lopez Cerezo y J.L. Lujan Lopez (eds.) (1996), Ciencia, tecnologia y sociedad: una introduccion al estudio social de la ciencia y la tecnologia. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Gieryn, T.F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Guston, D.H. (2000), Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hackett, E.J., O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch y J. Wajcman (eds.) (2007), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (3a edicion). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Jasanoff, S. et al. (eds.) (1995), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (2a edicion). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Jasanoff, S. (2003), technologies of Humility; Citizen Participation in Governing Science, Minerva 41/3: 223-244.
• Jasanoff, S. (2010), A field of its own: The emergence of science and technology studies, en: R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, C. Mitcham y J.B. Holbrook (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 191-205.
• Jensen, C.B. (2010), Ontologies for developing things. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Kuhn, T.S. (1962/1970), La estructura de las revoluciones cientificas. Mexico: FCE, 1971.
• Labinger, Jay A. and Collins, Harry (eds.) (2001), The One Culture? A Conversation About Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Latour, B. (1983), Ciencia en accion. Barcelona: Labor, 1987.
• Law, J. (2010), The materials of STS, en: Hicks, Dan and Beaudry, Mary (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Material Cultural Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171-186.
• Miller, C. (2001), Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime, Science, Technology, and Human Values 26/4: 478-500.
• Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Roy, R. (1993), STS-I and STS-D: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary STS, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 13/5: 247-250.
• Schiebinger, L. (1999), Has Feminism Changed Science? Harvard: Cambridge University Press.
• Spiegel-Rossing, I. y D.J. de Solla Price (eds.) (1977), Handbook of Science, Technology and Society, Londres: Sage.
• Star, S.L. (1991), Power, Technology, and the Phenomenology of Conventions: on Being Allergic to Onions, en: J. Law (ed.) (1991), A Sociology of Monsters, Londres: Routledge.
• Wajcman, J. (2004), Tecnofeminismo. Madrid: Catedra, 2006.
• Wynne, B. (2007), Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake*, EASST 1/1: 99-110.