A scaled-down conference model for courses covering ever-changing fields in computer science undergraduate degree programs

  1. Molleda Meré, Julio
  2. Usamentiaga Fernández, Rubén
  3. Granda Candás, Juan Carlos
  4. Entrialgo, Joaquín
Journal:
Aula abierta

ISSN: 0210-2773

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 41

Issue: 1

Pages: 85-98

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Aula abierta

Abstract

The ability to keep up to date in fast-evolving fields of knowledge is essential for all students, but it is especially important in computer science degree programs. However, few computer science curricula provide courses covering these skills. In this paper, the effectiveness of a scaled-down conference model approach aimed to develop these skills is analyzed. The proposed model was applied to a core subject in the third year of the computer engineering undergraduate program of the University of Oviedo: Technology of Computers. The model is intended as a platform for the activities related with creating a survey paper and a poster, and presenting them to a conference organized in the course, while encouraging teamwork, critical thinking, decision making, time management and communication skills. The model was applied in three academic years: 2007-2010, with 182 students, who voluntarily enrolled this methodology. The effectiveness of the model for driving TC activities has been evaluated based on the feedback provided by students and the quality of the papers and posters submitted to the conference. A slight improvement in overall student performance was noticed, and students assessed the methodology highly and reported that the new methodology had helped them to acquire the expected skills.

Bibliographic References

  • Borstler, J., & Johansson, O. (1998). The students conference - a tool for the teaching of research, writing, and presentation skills. SIGCSE Bulletin (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education), 30(3), 28-31. doi: 10.1145/ 282991.283007.
  • Boulos, M. N. K, Maramba, I., & Wheeler. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts : A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-6- 41.
  • Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative Learning : Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge, 2nd Ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkings University Press.
  • Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement : Lessons from trenches. Computers & Education, 52, 141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003.
  • Duit, R. (1995).The constructivist view : A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 271-286). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gruba, P., & Sondergaard, H. (2001). A constructivist approach to communication skills instruction in computer science. Computer Science Education, 11, 203-219. doi: 10.1076/csed. 11.3.203.3833.
  • Hennessy, J.L., & Patterson, D.A. (2011). Computer architecture : A quantitative approach, 5th Ed. Waltham, MA : Morgan Kaufmann. Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 445-478. doi: 10.1007/s11412-009-9072-x.
  • Johnson, S. C., Suriya, C., Yoon, S. W., Berrett, J. V., & Fleur, J. L. (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers & Education, 39, 379-393. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00074-X.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Thinking technology : context is everything. Education Technology, 31, 35-37. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003.
  • Khalifa, M., & Kam, R. (2002). Web-based learning : Effects on learning process and outcome. Transactions on Education, 45(4), 350-356. doi: 10.1109/TE.2002.804395.
  • Knuth, R., & Cunnigham, D. (1993). Designing environments for constructive learning. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck,. & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Tools for constructivism (pp. 163-188). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Macdonald, R. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning : process and product. Computers and Education, 40, 377-391. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9.
  • MacKnight, C. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educance Quarterly, 4, 39-42.
  • McConell, D. (2000). Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, 2nd Ed. United Kingdom, UK: Routledge.
  • Moodle. (n.d.). Moodle website. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://moodle.org.
  • Morley, D., & Parker, C.S. (2010). Understanding Computers, 12th Ed. Course Technology Cengage Learning. Stamford, CT.
  • Mueller, S. (2011). Upgrading and Repairing PCs, 20th Ed. Que Publishing, Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers and Education, 42, 243-265. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003.
  • Sancho-Thomas, P., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2009). Learning teamwork skills in university programming courses. Computers & Education, 53, 517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.010.
  • Sigala, M. (2007). Integrating web 2.0 in e-learning environments : A socio-technical approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3, 628-648. doi: 10.1504/IJKL.2007.016837.
  • Sutherland, P., & Crowther, J. (2006). Lifelong learning : Concepts and contexts. United Kingdom, UK : Routledge.
  • Tan, W., Lin, S., Yamg, Y., & Zhao, X. (2008). Design on collaborative virtual learning community and learning process visualization. Lecture notes in computer science, 5145, 424-433. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85033-5_42.
  • Tapper, J., & Gruba, P. (2000). Using a Conference Model to Teach Communication skills in a communication across the curriculum program. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 4, 55-65.
Data source: Dialnet