Effect of an intervention in self-regulation strategies on academic achievement in elementary schoola study of the mediating effect of self-regulatory activity

  1. José Carlos Núñez Pérez
  2. Ellián Tuero Herrero
  3. María Estrella Fernández Alba
  4. Francisco Javier Añón Zapico
  5. Emmanuel Manalo
  6. Pedro Rosário
Zeitschrift:
Revista de psicodidáctica

ISSN: 1136-1034

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 27

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 9-20

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1016/J.PSICOD.2021.09.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista de psicodidáctica

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to analyse the extent to which a training program in SelfRegulated Learning (SRL) and Reading Comprehension (RC) strategies would lead to improvements in these competencies in elementary school students, and (2) the extent to which the improvements in these competencies would be associated with improvements in academic achievement. An experimental study with an experimental group and a control group was conducted in an authentic environment with pre, post, and follow-up measures. A total of 758 elementary school students participated in the study, (403 in the experimental group and 355 in the control group). The results revealed that (1) the strategic activity mediated the effect of the intervention on academic achievement. In fact, (a) the intervention produced significant improvements in the reported use of SRL and on RC strategies and (b) the increase in such strategies was associated with higher academic achievement. In addition, (2) we found that, together with this indirect effect, the intervention influenced academic achievement through variables or conditions other than the strategic activity displayed. Likewise, (3) we were able to verify that the indirect effects through RC strategies were greater than those of SRL strategies. Finally, the analysis results showed that the total effect of the intervention explained 30% of the academic achievement variance. These results are discussed in relation to those reported by previous similar studies.

€ Finanzierung ansehen

Informationen zur Finanzierung

Geldgeber

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Amieiro, N., Valle, A., Rosário, P., y Núñez, J. C. (2019). The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived usefulness between strategy knowledge and its use. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.09.001
  • Chu, L., Li, P.-H., y Yu, M.-N. (2020). The longitudinal effect of children’s self-regulated learning on reading habits and well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101673
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., y Arribas, A. (2007). Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores. Revisada. TEA.
  • de Boer, H., Donker, A. S., Kostons, D. D. N. M., y van del Werf, G. P. C. (2018). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
  • de Smul, M., Heirweg, S., Van Keer, H., Devos, G., y Vandevelde, S. (2018). How competent do teachers feel instructing self-regulated learning strategies? Development and validation of the teacher self-efficacy scale to implement self-regulated learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.001
  • Dignath, C., y Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at elementary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  • Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath-van Ewijk, C. C., y van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
  • Föster, N., Kawohl, E., y Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009
  • Frazier, L. D., Schwartz, B. L., y Metcalfe, J. (2021). The MAPS model of self-regulation: Integrating metacognition, agency, and possible selves. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09255-3 Högemann, J., Cunha, J., Nú ̃nez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Rodríguez, C., y Rosário,
  • P. (2021). Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: Examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables. Reading and Writing, 34, 1681–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0
  • Järvela, S., Malmberg, J., Haataja, E., Sobocinski, M., y Kirschner, P. (2021). What multimodal data can tell us about the students’ regulation of their learning process? Learning and Instruction, 72, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.004
  • Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., y Jak, S. (2019). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292
  • Jian, Y. C. (2021). The immediate and delayed effects of text-diagram reading instruction on reading comprehension and learning processes: Evidence from eye movements\. Reading and Writing, 34, 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10089-3
  • Karabenick, S. A., Berger, J.-L., Ruzek, E., y Schenke, K. (2021). Strategy motivation and strategy use: Role of student appraisals of utility and cost. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09256-12
  • Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., van Ewijk, C. D., Büttner, G., y Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3
  • Kitsantas, A., Cleary, T. J., Whitehead, A., y Cheema, J. (2021). Relations among classroom context, student motivation, and mathematics literacy: A social cognitive perspective. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09249-1
  • Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y., y Chinn, C. A. (Eds.). (2017). Promoting spontaneous use of learning and reasoning strategies: Theory, research, and practice for effective transfer. Routledge.
  • Muthén, L. K., y Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles.
  • Núñez, J. C., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., y González-Pienda, J. A. (2013). A longitudinal assessment of the effectiveness of a school-based mentoring program in middle school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.002
  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  • Rosário, P., Högemann, J., Núñez, J. C., Vallejo, G., Cunha, J., Rodríguez, C., y Fuentes, S. (2019). The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0218099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218099
  • Rosário, P., Lourenc ̧ o, A., Paiva, M. O., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., y Valle, A. (2012). Self-efficacy and perceived utility as necessary conditions for self-regulated academic learning. Anales de Psicología, 28, 37–44.
  • Rosário, P., Núnez, J. C., Magalhães, P., Fuentes, S., Magalhães, C., y Busing, K. (2020). Improving College students’ critical thinking through the use of a story tool for self-regulated learning training. En E. Manalo (Ed.), Deeper learning, dialo- gical learning, and critical thinking (pp. 193–208). Routledge: Research-based strategies for the classroom.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Rodríguez, C., Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Tuero, E., y Höguemann, J. (2017). Analysis of instructional programs for improving self-regulated learning SRL through written text. En R. Fidalgo, K. Harris, y M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing. Theoretical and empirical grounded principles. (pp. 201–231).
  • Brill Editions. Rovers, S. F., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H., de Bruin, A. B., y van Merriën-boer, J. J. (2019). Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6
  • Sánchez, E., Orrantia, J., y Rosales, J. (1992). Cómo mejorar la comprensión de textos en el aula. Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación, 4(14), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02147033.1992.10821020
  • Stoeger, H., Sontag, C., y Ziegler, A. (2014). Impact of a teacherled intervention on preference for self-regulated learning, finding main ideas in expository texts, and reading comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology. 106, 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036035
  • Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 13–41). Academic Pres
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet