Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP)an interdependence analysis of self-reports

  1. Luis Rodríguez-Franco 1
  2. Joel Juarros-Basterretxea 2
  3. Susana Paíno-Quesada 3
  4. Juan Herrero 4
  5. Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Díaz 4
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  3. 3 Universidad de Huelva
    info

    Universidad de Huelva

    Huelva, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03a1kt624

  4. 4 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Pages: 91-100

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2021.100276 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Background/Objective: Although measurement instruments for intimate partner violence (IPV) are available, their validity considering the interdependence of victimization and perpetration self-reports based on dyadic reports has not been tested. The aim was to test the validity and reliability of a new version of the Dating Violence Questionnaire (DVQ–R) that includes the interdependence of victimization and perpetration self-reports using current couple information. Method: Participants were young adults comprising 616 current heterosexual couples. Each dyad member responded to the victimization and perpetration versions of the DVQ-R independently from their partner. Results: The victimization-perpetration interdependence model based on dyadic data showed a good fit to the data and was invariant across sexes. All the factors were significantly correlated with each other and were reliable. Conclusions: The DVQ is a valid and reliable measurement instrument for the independent assessment of IPV perpetration and victimization in adolescent and young adult populations and an interdependent measure of IPV victimization and perpetration. The DVQ–VP is invariant across sexes, which makes the results obtained for males and females comparable. These results show the relevance of considering perpetration and victimization together and emphasize the necessity to be cautious regarding the excessive reliability of individual self-reported perpetration or victimization to obtain more precise knowledge.

Bibliographic References

  • Alfaro-Urquiola, A. (2020). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnaire-R (DVQ-R) in a sample of young people from La Paz. Ajayu, 18, 102–120.
  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guildford.
  • Cantos, A. L., Kosson, D. S., Goldstein, D. A., & O’Leary, K. D (2019). Treatment impact on recidivism of family only vs. generally violent partner violence perpetrators. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 19, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.05.002.
  • Cherrez-Santos, A., V., Alulema-Sanchez, S., & Juarros-Basterretxea, J. (in press). Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire-R in women from Ecuador. Revista Electronica de Metodología Aplicada.
  • CDC. (2020). Preventing intimate partner violence. . https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/fastfact.html.
  • Cunha, O., & Gonc¸ alves, R. A. (2017). Male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A comparison between incarcerated and community offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62, 3260–3277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x17741070.
  • Dardis, C. M., Dixon, K. J., Edwards, K. M., & Turchik, J. A. (2015). An examination of the factors related to dating violence perpetration among young men and women and associated theoretical explanations: A review of literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 16, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013517559.
  • Duval, A., Lanning, B. A., & Patterson, M. S. (2020). A systematic review of dating violence risk factors among undergraduate college students. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21, 567–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018782207.
  • Edwards, K. M., Sylaska, K. M., & Neal, A. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: A critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychology of Violence, 5, 112–121. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038656.
  • Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Reliability coefficients for categorical response scales. Psicothema, 20, 896–901.
  • Exner-Cortens, Eckenrode, J., Bunge, J., & Rothman, E (2017). Revictimization after adolescent dating violence in a matched, national sample of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.015.
  • Exner-Cortens, D., Gill, L., & Eckenrode, J. (2016a). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 1, behaviors). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007.
  • Exner-Cortens, D., Gill, L., & Eckenrode, J. (2016b). Measurement of adolescent dating violence: A comprehensive review (Part 2, attitudes). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007.
  • Gancedo, Y., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., Vilariño, M., & Arce, R. (2021). Reality Monitoring: A meta-analytical review for forensic practice. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a10.
  • Hammock, G. S., Richardson, D. S., Lamm, K. B., Taylor, E., & Verlaque, L. (2017). The effect of gender of perpetrator and victim on perceptions of psychological and physical intimate partner aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9850-y.
  • Harden, J., McAllister, P., Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. M. (2020). The dark side of the rainbow: Queer women’s experiences of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020933869 Advanced online publication.
  • Hardesty, J. L., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2020). A socioecological perspective on intimate partner violence research: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82, 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12652.
  • Herrero, J., Rejano-Hernandez, L., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2020). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model in the study of aggression and victimization within couples: an empirical examination in 361 dyads. Psychosocial Intervention, 29, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a12.
  • Herrero, J., Torres, A., Fernández-Suárez, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2016). Generalists versus specialists: Toward a typology of batterers in prison. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2015.09.002.
  • Herrero, J., Torres, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2018). Child abuse, risk in male partner selection and intimate partner violence victimization of women of the European Union. Prevention Science, 19, 1102–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0911-8.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Jennings, W. G., Okeem, C., Piquero, A. R., Sellers, C. S., Theobald, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). Dating and intimate partner violence among Young persons ages 15-30: Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.007.
  • Johnson, W. L., Taylor, B. G., Mumford, E. A., & Liu, W. (2020). Dyadiccorrelatesoftheperpetrationofpsychologicalaggressionamongintimatepartners. Psychology of Violence, 10, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000257.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Herrero, J., Escoda-Menéndez, P., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2020). Cluster B personality traits and psychological intimate partner violence: Considering the mediational role of alcohol. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922351 Advanced online publication.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Herrero, J., Fernández-Suárez, A., Perez, B., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2018). Are generalist batterers different from generally extra-family violent men? A study among imprisoned male violent offenders. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 10, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2018v10n1a1.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Ocampo, N. Y., Herrero, J., & RodríguezDíaz, F. J. (in press). Dyadic analysis of emotional intimate partner violence: An empirical examination among 242 dyads. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context.
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Overall, N., Herrero, J., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2019). Considering the effect of sexism on psychological intimate partner violence: A study with imprisoned men. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2019a1.
  • Lara, L., & López-Cepero, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire: Reviewing the evidence in Chilean Youths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760612 Advanced online publication.
  • Laskey, P., Bates, E. A., & Taylor, J. C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.014.
  • Lin, W. H., & Chiao, C. (2020). Adverse adolescence experiences, feeling lonely across life stages and loneliness in adulthood. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 20, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.006.
  • Lin, K., Hu, R., Wang, X., & Xue, J. (2020). Female same-sex bidirectional intimate partner violence in China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959624 Advanced online publication..
  • López-Cepero, J., Fabelo, H. E., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2016). The Dating Violence Questionnaire: Validation of the Cuestionario de Violencia de Novios using a college sample from the United States. Violence and Victims, 31, 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00077.
  • López-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2015). Measuring intimate partner abuse. A review of behavioral assessment tools. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluación Psicológica, 2, 37–50.
  • Marcos, V., Gancedo, Y., Castro, B., & Selaya, A. (2020). Dating violence victimization, perceived gravity in dating violence behaviors, sexism, romantic love myths and emotional dependence between female and male adolescents. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 11, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2020.02.040.
  • Martínez-Gómez, J. A., Bolívar-Suarez, Y., Rey-Anacona, C. A., Ramírez-Ortiz, L. C., Lizarazo-Ojeda, A. M., & Yanez Peruñuñi, L. Y. (2021). Traditional schemes of sexual gender roles, power in relationships and dating violence. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2021.01.041.
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña Gómez, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González Lozano, P. (2007). Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships in Spanish university students. Psicothema, 19, 102–107.
  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh edition. Author.
  • Park, S., & Kim, S. H. (2019). Who Are the Victims and Who Are the Perpetrators in Dating Violence? Sharing the Role of Victim and Perpetrator. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 732–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017730648.
  • Peitzmeier, S. M., Malik, M., Kattari, S. K., Marrow, E., Stephenson, R., Agenor, M., & Reisner, S. L. (2020). Intimate partner violence in transgender populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020. 305774 Advanced online publication.
  • Presaghi, F., Manca, M., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Curcio, G. (2015). A questionnaire for the assessment of violent behaviors in Young couples: the Italian version of Dating Violence Questionnaire (DVQ). PLOS One, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126089 Article e0126089.
  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004.
  • Ramiro-Sanchez, T., Ramiro, M. T., Bermudez, M. P., & Buela-Casal, G. (2018). Sexism in adolescent relationships: A systematic review. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a1900002.
  • Riesgo González, N., Fernández-Suarez, A., Herrero, J., Rejano-Hernández, L., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Paino-Quesada, S. G., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2019). Concordancia en la percepcion de conductas violentas en parejas adolescentes. Terapia psicologica, 37, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082019000200154.
  • Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero, J., Rodríguez-Franco, L., Bringas-Molleda, C., Paíno-Quesada, S. G., & Perez-Sanchez, B. (2017). Validation of Dating Violence Questionnarie-R (DVQ-R). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.09.001.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Antuña, M. A., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Herrero, F. J., & Nieves, V. E. (2007). Violencia de genero en relaciones de pareja durante la adolescencia: analisis diferencial del Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios (CuViNo). In R. Arce, F. Farina, E. Alfaro, C. Civera, F. Tortosa (Eds.), ~ Psicología jurídica. Violencia y víctimas (pp. 137 147). Council of Valencia.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Gracia, C., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Fernandez-Suárez, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2017). Generalist and specialist batterers in teen and young dating violence: Implications for development of prevention programs. Accion Psicologica , 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.14.2.20743.
  • Rodríguez-Franco, L., Lopez-Cepero, J., Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J., Bringas, C., Antuna, A., & Estrada, C. (2010). Validación del Cuestionario de Violencia entre Novios (CUVINO) en jovenes hispanohablantes: Analisis de resultados en España, México y Argentina. Anuario de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud /Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 45–53.
  • Rojas-Solís, J. L., Guzmán-Pimentel, M., Jimenez-Castro, M. P., Martínez-Ruíz, L., & Flores-Hernandez, B. G. (2019). Violence towards men in the heterosexual couple: A review. Ciencia y Sociedad, 44, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2019.v44i1.pp57-70.
  • Rubio-Garay, F., Lopez-González, M. A., Carrasco, M. A., & Amor, P. J. (2017). The prevalence of dating violence: A systematic review. Psychologist Papers, 38, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2017.2831.
  • Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540.
  • Sjodin, € A. K., Wallinius, M., Billstedt, E., Hofvander, B., & Nilsson, T. (2017). Dating violence compared to other types of violence: Similar offenders but different victims. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2017.03.001.
  • Smith, J., Mulford, C., Latzman, N. E., Tharp, A. T., Niolon, P. H., & Blachman-Demner, D. (2015). Tacking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1049767.
  • Schnurr, M. P., Lohman, B. J., & Kaura, S. A. (2010). Variation in late adolescents' reports of dating violence perpetration: a dyadic analysis. Violence and Victims, 25, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.1.84.
  • Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2019). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplusand the lavaan/semTools Packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776.
  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.
  • Vilariño, M., Amado, B. G., Vazquez, M. J., & Arce, R. (2018). Psychological harm in women victims of intimate partner violence: Epidemiology and quantification of injury in mental health markers. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a23.
  • Wincentak, K., Connolly, J., & Card, N. (2017). Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence, 7, 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040194.