Realidad organizacional y teletrabajo

  1. Mañas Rodríguez, Miguel Angel
  2. Muñoz Alba, Estefanía
  3. Pecino Medina, Vicente
Revista:
Comunitania: Revista internacional de trabajo social y ciencias sociales

ISSN: 2173-0512

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 4

Páginas: 105-122

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/COMUNITANIA.4.5 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Comunitania: Revista internacional de trabajo social y ciencias sociales

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andriessen, J. y Vartiainen, M. 2006. Mobile Virtual Work. A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer.
  • Bailey, D. y Kurland, N. 2002. “A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work”. Journal of Organizational Dynamics, 28: 383-400.
  • Baruch, Y. y Nicholson, N. 1997. “Home, sweet work: requirements for effective home working”. Journal of General Management, 23: 15–30.
  • Bentley, K. y Yoong, P. 2000. “Knowledge work and telework: an exploratory study”. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10: 346-356.
  • Bhattacharya, M., Gibson, D. y Doty, D. 2005. “The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance”. Journal of Management, 31: 622-640.
  • Brodt, T.L. y Verburg, R.M. 2007.“ Managing mobile work–insights from European practice”. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22: 52-65.
  • Butler, E.S., Aasheim, C. y Williams, S. 2007. “Does telecommuting improve productivity? Seeking solid evidence of demonstrable productivity gains”.Communications of the ACM, 50: 101-3.
  • Castells, M. 1996.The Rise of the Network Society, Vol.I of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford, MA: Blackwell.
  • Castells, M. 2001. La Galaxia Internet. Reflexiones sobre Internet, Empresa y Sociedad. Madrid: Plaza&Janés.
  • Chaudron, D. 1995. “The “far-out” success of teleworking”. Supervisory Management, 40: 1-2.
  • Chinchilla, N. y León, C. 2007. Guía de Buenas Prácticas de la Empresa Flexible. Navarra: IESE.
  • Clear, F. y Dickson, K. 2005. “Teleworking practice in small and medium-sized firms: management style and worker autonomy”. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20: 218-233.
  • Clear, F. 2007. “SMEs, electronically-mediated working and data security: cause for concern?”. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2: 1-20.
  • Collins, C. y Clark, K. 2003. “Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: the role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage”. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 740-751.
  • Collins, M. 2005. “The not so simple case for teleworking: a study at Lloyd’s of London”. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20: 115-132.
  • Cyber Dialogue Inc. 2000. Small Business/Home Office Trend Report. New York.
  • Del-Águila, A., Bruque, S. y Padilla, A. 2002. The economic and organizational aspects of telecentres: the Spanish case. Elsevier Science Ltd. (http://www.elsevier.com).
  • Duxbury, L.E. y Neufeld, D. 1999.“ An empirical evaluation of the impacts of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16: 1–28.
  • Egan B. 1997. “Feasibility and Cost Benefit Analysis”. International Telework Association Annual International Conference: Crystal City, VA.
  • Fogarty, H., Scott, P. y Williams, S. 2011. “The Half-Empty Office: Dilemmas in Managing Locational Flexibility”. New Techonology, Work and Employment, 26: 183-195.
  • Fulmar, I., Gerhart, B. y Scott, K. 2003.“ Are the 100 best better? An empirical investigation of the relationship between being a ‘great place to work’ and firm performance” .Personnel Psychology, 56: 965-993.
  • Gainey, T.W., Kelley, D.E. y Hill, J.A. 1999. “Telecommuting’s impact on corporate culture and individual workers: examining the effect of employee isolation”. SAM Advanced Management Journal, Autumn: 4–10.
  • Gittleman, M., Horrigan, M. y Joyce, M. 1998. “Flexible workplace practices: evidence from anationally representative survey”. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 52: 99- 115.
  • Grenier, J., Giles, A. y Belanger, J. 1997. “Internal versus external labour flexibility: a twoplant comparison in Canadian manufacturing”. Industrial Relations, 52: 683-711.
  • Handy, S.L. y Mokhtarian, P.L. 1995. “Planning for telecommuting: measurement and policy issues”. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61: 99–111.
  • Harrington, S. y Ruppel, C. 1999. “Telecommuting: a test of trust, competing values, and relative advantage”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42: 223-239.
  • Harris, L. 2003. “Home-based teleworking and the employment relationship”.Personnel Review, 32: 422-437.
  • Hertel, G., Geister, S. y Konrad, U. 2005. “Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research”. Human Resource Management Review, 15: 69-95.
  • Hinds, P. y Kiesler, S. 2002. Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hislop, D. 2002. “Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology”. Journal of Information Technology, 17: 165-177.
  • Huselid, M. 1995.“The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance”. Academy of Management Journal 38: 635-672.
  • Huws, U., Werner, B.K. y Simon, R. 1990. Telework towards the elusive office. Chichester, England: Wiley
  • Illegems, V., Verbeke, A. y S’Jegers, R. 2001. “The organizational context of teleworking implementation”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68: 275-291.
  • Jackson, P. 1999. Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. London: Routledge.
  • Kalleberg, A. 2001. “Organizing flexibility: the flexible firm in a new century”. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39: 479-504.
  • Karuppan, C. 2004. “Strategies to foster labor flexibility”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53: 532-547.
  • Kopelman, R.E., Brief, A.P. y Guzzo, R.A. 1990. “The Role of Climate and Culture in Productivity”. Pp.193-236 en Organizational Climate and Culture editado por B. Schneider, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kossek, E., Lautsch, B. y Eaton, S. 2006. “Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68: 347-367.
  • Lehto, A.M. y Sutela, H. 2009. Three Decades of Working Conditions. Findings of Finish Quality of Work Life Surveys 1977–2008. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
  • Luukinen A. 1996. A profile of Finnish telework: survey results concerning the nature, extent, and potential of telework in Finland. Pp. 1-49 en Directions of Telework in Finland: Report by the Finnish Experience with Telework Project por A. Luukinen, Helsinki: Ministry of Labour: Publication of Labour Administration.
  • Mannering, J.S. y Mokhtarian, P.L. 1995. “Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting Frequency in California: An Exploratory Analysis”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49: 49-73.
  • Mañas, M.A., González-Romá, V. y Peiró, J.M. 1999. El Clima de los Equipos de Trabajo: Determinantes y Consecuencias. Almería: I.E.A.-UAL.
  • Martínez, A., Pérez, M., De Luis, P. y Vela, M.J. 2007. “Teleworking and workplace flexibility: a study of impact on firm performance”. Personnel Review 36: 42-64.
  • Martínez, A., Vela, M.J., Pérez, M. y De Luis, M.P. 2008. “Telework adoption, change management, and firm performance”. Journal of Organizational Change Management 21: 7–31.
  • Martínez, A., Pérez, M., De Luis, P. y Vela, M.J. 2009. “Teletrabajo, Flexibilidad de Recursos Humanos y Resultados de la Empresa”. Management 12: 52-79.
  • Matthes, K. 1992. “Telecommuting: balancing business and employee needs”. HR Focus 69: 3.
  • Metzger, R.O. y Von Glinow, M.A. 1988. “Off-site workers: at home and abroad”. California Management Review 30: 101–111.
  • Milliman, J., Von Glinow, M. y Natham, M. 1991. “Organizational life cycles and strategic international human resource management in multinational companies: implications for congruence theory”. Academy of Management Review 16: 318-339.
  • Mokhtarian, P.L., Bagley, M.N. y Salomon, I. 1998. “The impact of gender, occupation, and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49: 1115–1134.
  • Moen, P. 1996. “A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well-being”. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1: 131-144.
  • Nandhakumar, J. y Baskerville, R. 2006. ”Durability of online networking: patterns of trust”. Information Technology & People 19: 371-389.
  • Nilles, J.M., Carlson, R.F., Gray, P. y Hanneman, G.J. 1976. TheTelecommunicationsTransportation Tradeoff. Options for Tomorrow. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Nilles, J.M. 1998. Managing Telework. Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Olson MH. 1983. “Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time”. Communications of the ACM 26: 182–187.
  • Olson, M.H. y Primps, SB. 1984. “Working at home with computers: work and nonwork issues”. Journal of Social Issues 40: 97–112.
  • Olszewski, P. y Mokhtarian, P. 1994. “Telecommuting frequency and impacts for State of California employees”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 45: 275-286.
  • Ostroff, C. y Bowen, D. 2000. “Moving HR to a Higher Level: HR Practices and Organizational Effectiveness”. Pp. 211-266 en Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations por S.W.J. Kozlowski y K.J. Klein. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pérez, M., De Luis, M.P. y Martínez, A. 2001. “El teletrabajo en Aragón: estudio de su adopción potencial en las empresas”. Economía Aragonesa 15: 108-148.
  • Pérez, M., Martínez, A., De Luis, M.P. y Vela, M.J. 2003. “El impacto medioambiental del teletrabajo. Factores determinantes y estudio de un caso”. Economía Industrial 351: 111-156.
  • Pérez, M., Martínez, A., De Luis, M.P. y Vela, M-J. 2004. “La Adopción del Teletrabajo y las Tecnologías de la Información: Estudio de Relaciones y Efectos Organizativos”. Revista de Economía y Empresa 52 y 53: 11-27.
  • Perlow, L.A. 1997. Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
  • Pinsonneault, A. y Boisvert M. 2001. “The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: a review of the literature”. Pp. 163-185Telecommuting and Virtual Offices: Issues and Opportunitieseditadopor N.J. Johnson. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Pyöriä, P. 2011. “Managing telework: risks, fears and rules”. Management Research Review, 34: 386–399.
  • Raghuram, S., Wiesenfield, B. y Garud, R. 2003.“Technology enabled work: the role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63: 180-198.
  • Rice, R.E. y Gattiker, U.E. 2001. “New media and organizational structuring”. Pp. en The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods editado por F.M. Jablin y L.L. Putnam. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Ruiz, Y. y Walling, A. 2005. “Home-based working using Communication Technologies”. Labour Market Trends 113: 417-426.
  • Salomon, I. y Salomon, M. 1984. “Telecommuting: the employee’s perspective”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25: 15–28.
  • Schneider, B. 1983. “Work Climates: An Interactional Perspective”. Pp. 106-128 en Environmental Psychology: Directions and Perspectives editado por N.R. Feimer y E.S. Geller. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Schneider, B. y Reichers, A.E. 1983. “On the Etiology of Climates”. Personnel Psychology 36: 19-39.
  • Shamir, B. and Salomon, I. 1985. “Work-at-home and the quality of working life” .Academy of Management Review 10: 455–464.
  • Stokey, N. 1995. “R&D and economic growth”. Review of Economic Studies 62: 469-489.
  • Sullivan, C. 2003. “What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking”. New Technology, Work and Employment 18: 158-165.
  • Suomi, R. y Pekkola, J. 1999. “Management rationalities and virtual working: adjusting telework to different organisational cultures and rationalities”. Pp. 121-130 en Virtual Working: Social and Organizational Dynamics editado por Jackson, P. London: Routledge.
  • Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”. Strategic Management Journal 18: 509-533.
  • Thibault, J. 2000. El Teletrabajo. Madrid: CES Estudios.
  • Upton, D. 1995. “What really makes factories flexible?”. Harvard Business Review 73: 74-84.
  • Verdú, A., Lloréns, J. y García, V. 2005. “Flexibility, Fit and Innovative Capacity: An Empirical Examination”. InternationalJournal of Technology Management 30: 131-146.
  • Vilaseca, J. Coord. 2004. El Teletreball a Catalunya: Conceptes, Tipologies, MétriquesiPolitiques. Barcelona: CTES Ed.
  • Volberda, H. 1996. “Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments”. Organization Science 7: 359-374.
  • Watad, M. y DiSanzo, F.J. 2000.“Case study: the synergism of telecommuting and office automation”. Sloan Management Review 41: 85–96.
  • Wright, P. y Snell, S. 1998. “Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management”. Academy of Management Review 23: 756-772.