Teacher as Social Context (TASC) Questionnaire in the Spanish SettingTeacher Version

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293
• Amoura, C., Berjot, S., Gillet, N., Caruana, S., Cohen, J., & Finez, L. (2015). Autonomy-supportive and controlling styles of teaching: Opposite or distinct teaching styles? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74, 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000156
• Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check and connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.01.002
• Bailey, T. H. & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474
• Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J. (1992). Teacher as social context (TASC). Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support (Technical Report). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, J. W. (2018). Why autonomy-supportive interventions work: Explaining the professional development of teachers’ motivating style. Teacher and Teacher Education, 69, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.022
• Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., Ntoumanis, N., Gillet, N., Kim, B. R., & Song, Y. G. (2019). Expanding autonomy psychological need states from two (satisfaction, frustration) to three (dissatisfaction): A classroom-based intervention study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 685-702. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000306
• Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 9, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
• Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Self-processes and development (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B: Methodological), 39(1), 1-38. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
• Early, D. M., Berg, J. K., Alicea, S., Si, Y., Aber, J. L., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2016). The impact of every classroom, every day on high school student achievement: Results from a school-randomized trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.10 80/19345747.2015.1055638
• Erturan Ilker, G., Quested, E., Appleton, P., & Duda, J. (2018). A cross-cultural study testing the universality of basic psychological needs theory across different academic subjects. Psychology in the schools, 55, 350- 365. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22113
• Esteve-Zarazaga, J. M. (2003). La tercera revolución educativa. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
• Fernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2012). Imputación de datos perdidos en las evaluaciones diagnósticas educativas. Psicothema, 24, 167-175.
• Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
• Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
• Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No.098). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/ southeast/pdf/REL_2011098.pdf
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
• Garn, A. C., Mathews, M. S., & Jolly, J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determined theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 263-272. https://doi. org/10.1177/0016986210377657
• Gil Pascual J. A. (2011). Técnicas e instrumentos para la recogida de información. Madrid, España: UNED.
• Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
• Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.) (2004). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 metaanalyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Katz, I. & Shahar, B. H. (2015). What makes a motivating teacher? Teachers’motivation and beliefs as predictors of their autonomysupportive style. School Psychology International, 36, 575-588. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0143034315609969
• Klem, A. M. & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
• Korthagen, F. & Evelein, F. (2016). Relations between student teachers’ basic needs fulfillment and their teaching behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.021
• Kosir, K., Socan, G., & Pecjak, S. (2007). The role of interpersonal relationships with peers and with teachers in students’ academic achievement. Review of Psychology, 14, 43-58.
• Lévy, J. P., Martín, M. T., & Román, M. V. (2006). Optimización según estructuras de covarianzas. In J. P. Lévy & J. Varela (Eds.), Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales (pp. 11-30). Madrid, España: Netbiblo.
• Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: the role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.19 88.10478722
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989X.1.2.130
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Irnidayanti, Y., & Van de Grift, W. (2016). Autonomous motivation in the Indonesian classroom: Relationship with teacher support through the lens of Self-Determination Theory. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25(3), 441 -451. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40299-016-0282-5
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Van de Grift, W. (2015). Pupils’ perception of teaching behaviour: Evaluation of an instrument and importance of academic motivation in Indonesian secondary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 69, 98 -112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijer.2014.11.002
• Maulana, R., & Opdenakker, M. C. (2014). Teachers’ interpersonal involvement as a predictor of students’ academic motivation among Indonesian Secondary school students: a multilevel growth curve analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 591 -603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0132-7
• Muñiz, J. (2000). Teoría clásica de los tests. Madrid, España: Pirámide.
• Niemiec C. P., Lynch M. F., Vansteenkiste M., Bernstein J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). The antecedents and consequences of autonomous self-regulation for college: A self-determination theory perspective on socialization. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 761-775. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.11.009
• Niemiec C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence and relatedness in the classroom. Aplying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144. https://doi. org/10.1177/1477878509104318
• Ogg, J. A., Brinkman, T. A., Dedrick, R. F., & Carlson, J. F. (2010). Factor structure and invariance across the Devereux early childhood assessment protective factor scale. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020251
• Opdenakker, M. V., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Relationships between learning environment characteristics and academic engagement. Psychological Reports, 109, 259-284. https://doi.org/10.2466/09.10.11.PR0.109.4.259- 284
• Opdenakker, M. C., Maulana, R., & Den Brok, P. J. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School effectiveness and school improvement; an International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23(1), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.6191 98
• Peña-Calvo, J. V. (1993). Crisis, anomía y contradicciones en la profesión docente. Aula Abierta, 62, 29-62.
• Ratelle, C. F. & Duchesne, S. (2014). Trajectories of psychological need satisfaction from early to late adolescence as a predictor of adjustment in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 388-400. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.09.003
• Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375-392. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
• Richmond, V. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 3, 181-195. https://doi. org/10.1080/03634529009378801
• Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94, 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
• Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761- 774. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
• Roth, G., Assor, A., Niemiec, C., Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2009). The emotional and academic consequences of parental conditional regard: Comparing conditional positive regard, conditional negative regard, and autonomy support as parenting practices. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1119- 1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015272
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
• Sheldon, K. M. Abad, N., & Omoile, J. (2009). Testing Self-Determination Theory via Nigerian and Indian adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 451-459. https://doi. org/10.1177/0165025409340095
• Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57-68. https://doi. org/10.1348/000709908X304398
• Skinner, E. A. (1998). Strategies for studying social influences on motivation. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dwek (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (pp. 216-234). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
• Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765-781. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0012840
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective of engagement and disaffection. Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.
• Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022- 0663.82.1.22
• Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74- 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
• Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2009). Should parental prohibition of adolescents’ peer relationships be prohibited? Personal relationships, 16, 507-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 6811.2009.01237.x
• Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater: Applying the principle of universalism without uniformity to autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12103
• Sosic-Vasic, Z., Keis, O., Lau, M. , Spitzer, M., & Streb. J. (2015). The impact of motivation and teachers’ autonomy support on children’s executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.00146
• Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003
• Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342-358. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
• Taylor, I. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2010). Cultural differences in the relationships among autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality and effort in British and Chinese physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1123/ jsep.32.5.655
• Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.99.4.747
• Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determined theory approach to understand the antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.1.75
• Van Petegem, K., Creemers, B. P. M., Rossel, Y., & Aelterman, A. (2005). Relationships between teacher characteristics, interpersonal teacher behavior and teacher wellbeing. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40, 34-43.
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
• Virtanen, T. E., Lerkkanen, M. J., Poikkeus, A. M., & Kuorelahti, M. (2013). The relationship between classroom quality and students’ engagement in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 35, 963-983. https://doi. org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822961
• Wellborn, J., Connell, J., Skinner, E. A., & Pierson, L. H. (1988). Teacher as social context: A measure of teacher provision of involvement, structure and autonomy support (Tech. Rep. No. 102). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
• Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 12, 1-26.
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Creed , P. A., & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stageenvironment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 911-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008