Los mecanismos causales de la participación socialuna aplicación a la regeneración urbana
- Simone Busetti 1
- Moneyba González Medina 2
- María Ángeles Huete García 3
- Rafael Merinero Rodríguez 3
- 1 Politecnico di Milano (Italia)
-
2
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
info
-
3
Universidad Pablo de Olavide
info
ISSN: 0210-5233
Datum der Publikation: 2018
Nummer: 164
Seiten: 77-96
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas
Zusammenfassung
El enfoque de los «mecanismos causales» ayuda a identificar el poder causal de los distintos factores que intervienen en una política concreta y a definir la configuración de elementos que produce un determinado resultado. Este enfoque se aplica al caso del programa URBANA (2007- 2013) de Alcalá de Guadaíra (España), que presenta un incremento significativo de la participación social en comparación con los demás municipios que participaron en el programa. A partir de su estudio, se realiza un ejercicio de construcción teórica dirigido a descubrir los mecanismos causales que han desencadenado este resultado, pensando en su posible transferibilidad. Para la selección del caso, se ha aplicado una metodología cuantitativa, mientras que para la identificación de los mecanismos causales se han realizado entrevistas en profundidad a diversos actores implicados en la iniciativa.
Bibliographische Referenzen
- Atkinson, Rod y Rossignolo, Cristiana (2009). «An ‘Explicit’ EU Urban Policy Alter a ‘Learning’ Phase?». Paper presentado en II European Urban Research Association Conference. Madrid (3-5 junio).
- Bardach, Eugene (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens after a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
- Bardach, Eugene (2004). «The Extrapolation Problem: How Can We Learn from the Experience of Others?». Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2): 205-220.
- Barzelay, Michael (2007). «Learning from Secondâ Hand Experience: Methodology for ExtrapolationâOriented Case Research». Governance, 20(3): 521-543.
- Beach, Derek y Pedersen, Rasmus Brun (2013). Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
- Bhaskar, Roy (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
- Birkland, Thomas A. (1998). «Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting». Journal of Public Policy, 18(1): 53-74.
- Busetti, S. y Dente, B. (2018). «Designing multi-actor implementation: A mechanism-based approach». Public Policy and Administration, 33(1): 46-65.
- Considine, Mark; Alexander, Damon y Lewis, Jenny M. (2014). «Policy design as craft: teasing out policy design expertise using a semi-experimental approach». Policy sciences, 47(3): 209-225.
- Dror, Yehezkel (1971). Design for policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Company.
- Dryzek, John S. (1983). «Don't toss coins in garbage cans: A prologue to policy design». Journal of Public Policy, 3(04): 345-367.
- European Commission (2010). Cohesion Policy Support for Local Development: Best Practice and Future Policy Options. Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission (2011). Cities of tomorrow: challenges, visions, ways forward. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Elster, Jon (1989). Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Falleti, Tulia G. y Lynch, Julia F. (2009). «Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis». Comparative Political Studies, 20(10): 1-24.
- Gerring, John (2010). «Causal Mechanisms, yes but…». Comparative Political Studies, 43(11): 1.499-1.526.
- Goggin, Malcom L.; Bowman, Ann O.; Lester, James P. y O’Toole, Laurence J. Jr. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman/Little Brown.
- González Medina, Moneyba; Gregorio Hurtado, Sonia de; Huete García, María Ángeles y Carpenter, Juliet (2017). «Europeización y política urbana de la UE: impacto en las agendas urbanas nacionales de España, Francia, Italia y Reino Unido». Comunicación presentada en el XIII Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Política, Santiago de Compostela (20-22 septiembre).
- Greffe, Xavier (1990). Le Développement Économique Local. Brussels: Commission Européenne DGV.
- Gregorio Hurtado, Sonia de (2010). «El desarrollo de las iniciativas comunitarias URBAN y URBAN II en las periferias degradadas de las ciudades españolas. Una contribución a la práctica de la regeneración urbana en España». Ciudades, 13: 39-59.
- Gutiérrez Palomero, Aaron (2010). «La Iniciativa Comunitaria URBAN y la construcción inconclusa de una Política urbana para la Unión Europea». Papeles de Geografía, 51-52: 159-167.
- Hedström, Peter y Swedberg, Richard (1998). Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hood, Christopher C. y Margetts, Helen Z. (2007). The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hoppe, Robert (2017). «Heuristics for Practitioners of Policy Design: Rules-of-thumb for Structuring Unstructured Problems». Public Policy and Administration. DOI: 10.1177/0952076717709338.
- Howlett, Michael (1991). «Policy Instruments, Policy Styles, And Policy Implementation». Policy Studies Journal, 19(2): 1-21.
- Huete García, María Ángeles; Merinero Rodríguez, Rafael y Muñoz Moreno, Rocío (2016). «Urban Regeneration Policy from the Model of grated Urban Development in the European Union: An Analytical Approach Based on the Study of Spanish cities». Local Government Studies, 42(2): 267-286.
- Ingram, Helen y Schneider, Anne (1990). «Improving Implementation through Framing Smarter Statutes». Journal of Public Policy, 10(1): 67-88.
- Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Lascoumes, Pierre y Le Galès, Patrick (2007). «Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through its Instruments —From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation». Governance, 20(1): 1-21.
- Mahoney, James (2003). «Tentative Answers to Questions about Causal Mechanisms». Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, vol. 28.
- Mahoney, James (2007). «Tentative Answers to Questions about Causal Mechanisms». Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia, PA, vol. 28.
- May, Peter J. (2012). «Policy Design and Implementation». En: Peters, B. G. y Pierre, P. (eds.). The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
- Mayntz, Renate (2004). «Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena». Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2): 237-259.
- Mazmanian, Dan y Sabatier, Paul (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Glendale, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
- McAdam, Doug; Tarrow, Sidney y Tilly, Charles (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Meier, Kenneth J. (1999). «Are We Sure Lasswell Did lt This Way?». Policy Currents, 9(1): 5-8.
- OECD (1993). Territorial Development and Structural Change: A New Perspective on Adjustment and Reform. Paris: OECD.
- OECD (2001). Best Practices in Local Development. Paris: OECD.
- O’Toole, Laurence J. (1986). «Policy Recommendations for Multi-actor Implementation». Journal of Public Policy, 6(2): 181-210.
- O'Toole, Lawrence J. (2004). «The theory–practice issue in policy implementation research». Public administration, 82(2): 309-329.
- Overman, E. Sam y Boyd, Kathy J. (1994). «Best Practice Research and Bureaucratic Reform». Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4: 67-83.
- Parkinson, Michael (2005). «Urban Policy in Europe: Where Have we Been and where Are we Going?». Informe elaborado en el marco del Proyecto NODE sobre European Metropolitan Governance, Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science & Culture.
- Pawson, Ray (2002). «Evidence and Policy and Naming and Shaming». Policy Studies, 23(3): 211-230.
- Pawson, Ray y Tilley, Nick (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
- Pressman, Jeffrey L. y Wildavsky, Aaron (1984). Implementation. University of California Press.
- Ragin, Charles C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
- Rihoux, Benoît y Ragin, Charles C. (2009). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. London: Sage.
- Rose, Richard (1993). Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.
- Sabatier, Paul A. y Mazmanian, Daniel (1983). «Policy implementation». Encyclopedia of Policy Sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Schneider, Anne e Ingram, Helen (1988). «Systematically Pinching Ideas: A Comparative Approach to Policy Design». Journal of Public Policy, 8(1): 61-80.
- Simon, Herbert A. (1969). The Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Steel, Daniel (2007). Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Steel, Daniel (2008). Across the boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Tilly, Charles (2001). «Mechanisms in the Political Processes». American Political Science Review, 4: 21-41.
- Van Meter, Donald y Van Horn, Carl E. (1975). «The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework». Administration and Society, 6(4): 445-488.
- Vecchi, Giancarlo (2013). «Studying Good Practices to Lesson Drawing and Transfer: Introduction to the Causal Mechanisms Approach – A Proposal for Exchanges Among European Networks on Time-Oriented Policies». En: Henckel, D.; Thomaier, S.; Konecke, B.; Zedda, R. y Stefano, S. (eds.). Space-Time Design of the Public City. Berlin: Springer.