Comparison between two continuous performance tests for identifying ADHDtraditional vs. virtual reality

  1. Celestino Rodríguez 1
  2. Débora Areces 1
  3. Trinidad García 1
  4. Marisol Cueli 1
  5. Paloma González-Castro 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 18

Número: 3

Páginas: 254-263

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2018.06.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Resumen

Antecedentes/objetivos: Los tests de ejecución continua (Continuous Perfomance Test; CPT) han mostrado utilidad en la diferenciación de los niños con TDAH de los controles. Sin embargo, este tipo de tarea no está exenta de limitaciones como su baja validez ecológica. Para la mejora de la evaluación del Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad (TDAH) surgen en los últimos años los CPTs en realidad virtual. Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar el valor discriminativo de las variables proporcionadas por un CPT basado en la realidad virtual (Aula Nesplora) con respecto a aquellas recogidas por un CPT tradicional (Test de variables de atención; TOVA) para identificar las distintas presentaciones de TDAH. Método: Participaron un total de 338 estudiantes de entre 6 y 16 años (M = 10,84; DT = 3,01): 31,95% correspondientes a la presentación inatenta, 15,38% presentación hiperactiva-impulsiva, 22,78% presentación combinada y 29,88% controles. Resultados: Los resultados indicaron que el Aula Nesplora predice mejor que el TOVA las presentaciones de TDAH, así como a los estudiantes sin TDAH. Conclusiones: Se discuten las ventajas del uso de la realidad virtual en evaluación del TDAH, ya que facilitan el diagnóstico del trastorno y la diferenciación de sus presentaciones.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

  • Principality of Asturias
    • FC-15 GRUPIN14-053

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Álvarez-García, D., Barreiro-Collazo, S., Núnez, J. C., & Dobarro, A. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA). The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 69---77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.003
  • American Psychiatric Association, APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Areces, D., Rodríguez, C., García, T., Cueli, M., & González-Castro, P. (2016). Efficacy of a continuous performance test based on virtual reality in the diagnosis of ADHD and its clinical presentations. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054716629711
  • Berger, I., & Cassuto, H. (2014). The effect of environmental distractors incorporation into a CPT on sustained attention and ADHD diagnosis among adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 62---68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.012
  • Berger, I., Slobodin, O., & Cassuto, H. (2017). Usefulness and Validity of Continuous Performance Tests in the
  • Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32, 81---93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw101
  • Biederman, J., Petty, C. R., Evans, M., Small, J., & Faraone, S. V. (2010). How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-years follow up study of boys with ADHD. Psychiatry Research, 177, 299---304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres
  • Bioulac, S., Lallemand, S., Rizzo, A., Philip, P., Fabrigoule, C., & Bouvard, M. P. (2012). Impact of time on task on ADHD patient’s performances in a virtual classroom. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16, 514---521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.01.006
  • Climent, G., Banterla, F., & Iriarte, Y. (2011). AULA: Theoretical manual. San Sebastián: Nesplora.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Dalsgaard, S., Nielsen, H. S., & Simonsen, M. (2014). Consequences of ADHD medication use for children’s outcomes. Journal of Health Economics, 37, 137---151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.05.005
  • Díaz-Orueta, U., Garcia-López, C., Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Sánchez-Carpintero, R., Climent, G., & Narbona, J. (2014). AULA virtual reality test as an attention measure: Convergent validity with Conners’ continuous performance test. Child Neuropsychology, 20, 328---342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2013.792332
  • Farré, A., & Narbona, J. (2001). EDAH: Scale for the assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • González-Castro, P., Rodríguez, C., López, A., Cueli, M., & Álvarez, L. (2013). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, differential diagnosis with blood oxygenation, beta/theta ratio, and attention measures. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 101---109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S16972600(13)70013-9
  • Gravetter, F. J., &Wallnau, L. B. (2014). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Greenberg, L. M. (1993). Developmental normative data on the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1019---1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01105.x
  • Hall, C. L., Valentine, A. Z., Groom, M. J., Walker, G. M., Sayal, K., Daley, D., & Hollis, C. (2016). The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: A systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 25, 677---699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-015-0798-x
  • Lange, K. W., Hauser, J., Lange, K. M., Makulska-Gertruda, E., Takano, T., Takeuchi, Y., Tucha, L., & Tucha, O. (2014). Utility of cognitive neuropsychological assessment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 6, 241---248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12402-014-0132-3
  • Miranda, A., Colomer, C., Berenguer, C., Roselló, R., & Roselló, B. (2016). Substance use in young adults with ADHD: Comorbidity and symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 157---165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.09.001
  • Morales-Hidalgo, P., Hernández-Martínez, C., Vera, M., Voltas, N., & Canals, J. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Conners-3 and Conners Early Childhood Indexes in a Spanish school population. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17, 85---96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.07.003
  • Negut, A., Jurma, A. M., & David, D. (2017). Virtualreality-based attention assessment of ADHD: ClinicaVR Classroom-CPT versus a traditional continuous performance test. Child Neuropsychology, 23, 692---712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2016.1186617
  • Nigg, J. T., Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. (2005). Causal heterogeneity in attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder: Do we need neuropsychologically impaired subtypes? Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1224---1230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.025
  • Polanczyk, G. V., Willcutt, E. G., Salum, G. A., Kieling, C., & Rohde, L. A. (2014). ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: An updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, 434---442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt261
  • Rapport, M., Chung, K., Shore, G., Denney, C., & Isaacs, P. (2000). Upgrading the Science and Technology of Assessment and Diagnosis: Laboratory and Clinic-Based Assessment of Children With ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 555---568, doi:1207/s15374424jccp2904 8.
  • Riccio, C. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (2001). Continuous performance tests are sensitive to ADHD in adults but lack specificity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931, 113---139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05776.x
  • Rizzo, A. A., Buckwalter, J. G., Bowerly, T., Van Der Zaag, C., Humphrey, L., Neumann, U., & Sisemore, D. (2000). The virtual classroom: A virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(3), 483---499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/10949310050078940
  • Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., Cueli, M., Areces, D., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2016). Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnosis: An Activation-Executive Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1406. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01406
  • Shaffer, D., Fisher, P., Lucas, C. P., Dulcan, M. K., & SchwabStone, M. E. (2000). NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 28---38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014
  • Slobodin, O., Cassuto, H., & Berger, I. (2015). Age-related changes in distractibility: Developmental trajectory of sustained attention in ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054715575066
  • Vogt, C. (2017). The risk of misdiagnosing posture weakness as hyperactivity in ADHD: A case study. Attention Deficit Hyperactivy Disorder, 9, 239---251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12402-017-0221-1
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). London: Pearson Assessment.
  • Williams, J. R. (2008). Revising the declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Journal, 54, 120---125.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet