What more can we learn from REtD alliances?A review and research agenda

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahuja, G., Katila, R., Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:3 (2001), 197–220.
• Alcácer, J., Location choices across the value chain: how activity and capability influence collocation. Manag. Sci. 52:10 (2006), 1457–1471.
• Alcácer, J., Chung, W., Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Manag. Sci. 53:5 (2007), 760–776.
• Alcácer, J., Oxley, J., Learning by supplying. Strateg. Manag. J. 35:2 (2014), 204–223.
• Anand, B., Khanna, T., Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 21:3 (2000), 295–315.
• Ariño, A., de la Torre, J., Ring, P.S., Relational quality: managing trust in corporate alliances. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44:1 (2001), 109–131.
• Ariño, A., Reuer, J.J., Mayer, K.J., Jané J., Contracts, negotiation, and learning: an examination of termination provisions. J. Manag. Stud. 51:3 (2014), 379–405.
• Argyres, N., Zenger, T., Capabilities, transaction costs and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23:6 (2012), 1643–1667.
• Ashok, M., Narula, R., Martínez-Noya, A., How do collaboration and investments in knowledge management affect process innovation in services?. J. Knowl. Manag. 20:5. (2016), 1004–1024.
• Asmussen, C.G., Larsen, M.L., Pedersen, T., Organizational adaptation in offshoring: the relative performance of home- and host-based learning strategies. Organ. Sci. 27:4 (2016), 911–928.
• Awate, S., Larsen, M., Mudambi, R., Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: a comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 46 (2015), 63–86.
• Barney, J.B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17:1 (1991), 99–120.
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B., Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res. Policy 33:10 (2004), 1477–1492.
• Blanc, H., Sierra, C., The internationalization of R&D by multinationals: a tradeoff between external and internal proximity. Camb. J. Econ. 23 (1999), 187–206.
• Bogers, et al. The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Ind. Innov. 24:1 (2017), 8–40.
• Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., Pavitt, K., Knowledge specialization and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they do?. Adm. Sci. Q. 46 (2001), 597–621.
• Bunduchi, R., Trust, partner selection and innovation outcome in collaborative new product development. Prod. Plan. Control 24:2–3 (2013), 145–157.
• Cantwell, J.A., Santangelo, G.D., The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capability. Inf. Econ. Policy 11 (1999), 101–123.
• Capaldo, A., Petruzzelli, A.M., Partner geographic and organizational proximity and the innovative performance of knowledge-creating alliances. Eur. Manag. Rev. 11:1 (2014), 63–84.
• Carson, S., Madhok, A., Wu, T., Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: the effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Acad. Manag. J. 49:5 (2006), 1058–1077.
• Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Manag. Sci. 52 (2006), 68–82.
• Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. 2003, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Choi, J., Contractor, F.J., Choosing an appropriate alliance governance mode: the role of institutional, cultural and geographical distance in international research & development (R&D) collaborations. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 47:2 (2016), 210–232.
• Chung, S., Kim, G.M., Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint. Res. Policy 32 (2003), 587–603.
• Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35 (1990), 128–152.
• Contractor, F.J., Kumar, V., Kundu, S., Pedersen, T., Reconceptualizing the firm in a world of outsourcing and offshoring: the organizational and geographical relocation of high-value company functions. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 1417–1433.
• Contractor, F.J., Reuer, J.J., Structuring and governing alliances: new directions for research. Glob. Strategy J. 4 (2014), 241–256.
• Contractor, F., Woodley, J., The influence of asymmetric bargaining power, mutual hostages, and task characteristics on the governance structure of cross-border technology alliances. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 48:3 (2009), 403–422.
• Contractor, F.J., Woodley, J.A., Piepenbrink, A., Howtight an embrace? Choosing the optimal degree of partner interaction in alliances based on risk, technology characteristics, and agreement provisions. Glob. Strategy J. 1:1 (2011), 67–85.
• Criscuolo, P., Narula, R., Verspagen, B., Measuring knowledge flows among European and American multinationals: a patent citation analysis. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 14 (2005), 417–433.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Who cares about corruption?. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37 (2006), 807–822.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Nieto, M.J., Rodríguez, A., The impact of R&D sources on new product development: sources of funds and the diversity versus control of knowledge debate. Long Range Plan., 2017, 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.004 (in press).
• Das, T.K., Kumar, R., Regulatory focus and opportunism in the alliance development process. J. Manag. 37:3 (2011), 682–708.
• Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S., A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J. Manag. 26:1 (2000), 31–61.
• Diestre, L., Rajagopalan, N., Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 33:10 (2012), 1115–1134.
• Doh, J., Offshore outsourcing: implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. J. Manag. Stud. 42 (2005), 695–705.
• Doh, J., Bunyaratavej, K., Hahn, E., Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 40:6 (2009), 926–943.
• Dushnitsky, G., Shaver, J.M., Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: the paradox of corporate venture capital. Strateg. Manag. J. 30:10 (2009), 1045–1064.
• Duysters, G., Jacob, J., Lemmens, C., Jintian, Y., Internationalization and technological catching up of emerging multinationals: a comparative case study of China's Haier group. Ind. Corp. Change 18 (2009), 325–349.
• Dyer, J.H., Chu, W., The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organ. Sci. 14:1 (2003), 57–68.
• Dyer, J.H., Hatch, N.W., Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships. Strateg. Manag. J. 27 (2006), 701–719.
• Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23 (1998), 660–679.
• Faems, D., Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 22 (2005), 238–250.
• Feinberg, S., Gupta, A., Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries. Strateg. Manag. J. 25:8–9 (2004), 823–884.
• Fey, C.F., Birkinshaw, J., External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. J. Manag. 31:4 (2005), 597–621.
• Fosfuri, A., Roca, E., Naturaleza y características del conocimiento tecnológico y limitaciones a la transferencia de tecnología. Rev. Eur. Dir. Econ. Empres. 11 (2002), 139–152.
• García-Canal, E., Guillén, M.F., Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strateg. Manag. J. 29 (2008), 1097–1115.
• García-Canal, E., Valdés-Llaneza, A., Sánchez-Lorda, P., Technological flows and choice of joint ventures in technology alliances. Res. Policy 37:1 (2008), 97–114.
• Gooris, J., Peeters, C., Fragmenting global business processes: a protection for proprietary information. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 47:5 (2016), 535–562.
• Granstrand, O., Patel, P., Pavitt, K., Multi-technology corporations: why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competencies. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39:Summer (4) (1997), 8–25.
• Grimpe, C., Kaiser, U., Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: the gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 1483–1509.
• Gulati, R., Alliances and networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 19 (1998), 293–317.
• Gulati, R., Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties from contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Manag. J. 38 (1995), 85–112.
• Hagedoorn, J., Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy 31:4 (2002), 477–492.
• Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G., Satisficing strategies in dynamic inter-firm networks – the efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. Organ. Stud. 23:4 (2002), 525–548.
• Hagedoorn, J., Danielle, A.M., Cloodt, van Kranenburg, H., Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 36:2 (2005), 175–186.
• Hagedoorn, J., Hesen, G., Contract law and the governance of interfirm technology partnerships: an analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications. J. Manag. Stud. 44:3 (2007), 342–366.
• Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N., Vonortas, N.S., Research partnerships. Res. Policy 29:4 (2000), 567–586.
• Hamel, G., Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 12 (1991), 83–103.
• Hart, S., Christensen, C.M., Driving innovation from the base of the global pyramid. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 44:1 (2002), 51–56.
• Hätönen, J., Making the locational choice: a case approach to the development of a theory of offshore outsourcing and internationalization. J. Int. Manag. 15:1 (2009), 61–76.
• Hätonen, J., Eriksson, 30+ years of research and practice of outsourcing – exploring the past and anticipating the future. J. Int. Manag. 15 (2009), 142–155.
• Heiman, B., Nickerson, J.A., Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Manag. Decis. Econ. 25:6–7 (2004), 401–420.
• Henisz, The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law Econ. Organ. 16:2 (2000), 334–364.
• Hernández, V., Pedersen, T., Global value chain configuration: a review and research agenda. Bus. Res. Q. 20:2 (2017), 137–150.
• Hennart, F., A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strateg. Manag. J. 9:4 (1988), 361–374.
• Higgins, E.T., Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30 (1998), 1–46.
• Hoetker, G., How much you know versus how well I know you: selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strateg. Manag. J. 26 (2005), 75–96.
• Hong, J.F.L., Snell, R.S., Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing: a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers. Organ. Stud. 34:3 (2013), 377–406.
• Howard, M., Steensma, H.K., Lyles, M., Dhanaraj, C., Learning to collaborate through collaboration: how allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 37:10 (2016), 2092–2103.
• Howells, J., Gagliardi, D., Malik, K., The growth and management of R&D outsourcing: evidence from UK pharmaceuticals. R&D Manag. 38:2 (2008), 205–219.
• Iammarino, S., McCann, P., The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Res. Policy 35:7 (2006), 1018–1036.
• Jacob, J., Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V., Technology alliances in emerging economies: persistence and interrelation in European firms’ alliance formation. R&D Manag. 43 (2013), 447–460.
• Jensen, P.D.Ø., A learning perspective on the offshoring of advanced services. J. Int. Manag. 15 (2009), 181–193.
• Jiang, R.J., Tao, Q.T., Santoro, M.D., Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 31:10 (2010), 1136–1144.
• Kale, P., Dyer, J., Singh, H., Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strateg. Manag. J. 23:8 (2002), 747–767.
• Kale, P., Singh, H., Perlmutter, H., Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strateg. Manag. J. 21:3 (2000), 217–238.
• Kang, M.-P., Mahoney, J.T., Tan, D., Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: the case of OEM suppliers. Strateg. Manag. J. 30:2 (2009), 117–135.
• Katila, R., Rosenberger, J.D., Eisenhardt, K.M., Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Adm. Sci. Q., 53(2), 2008, 295.
• Kedia, B.L., Mukherjee, D., Understanding offshoring: a research framework based on disintegration, location and externalization advantages. J. World Bus. 44 (2009), 250–261.
• Kedia, B.L., Mooty, S.E., Learning and innovation in collaborative innovation networks. Kedia, B.L., Jain, S.C., (eds.) Restoring America's Global Competitiveness Through Innovation, 2013, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 3–27.
• Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N., The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strateg. Manag. J. 19 (1998), 193–210.
• Kogut, B., Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strateg. Manag. J. 9:4 (1988), 319–332.
• Kogut, B., Zander, U., Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational enterprise. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 24 (1993), 625–646.
• Kotabe, M., Mudambi, R., Global sourcing and value creation: opportunities and challenges. J. Int. Manag. 15:2 (2009), 121–125.
• Lado, A., Dant, R., Tekleab, A., Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 29:4 (2008), 401–423.
• Lahiri, N., Geographic distribution of R&D activity: how does it affect innovation quality?. Acad. Manag. J. 53:5 (2010), 1194–1209.
• Lai, W.H., Chang, P.L., Corporate motivation and performance in R&D alliances. J. Bus. Res. 63:5 (2010), 490–496.
• Larsen, M.M., Manning, S., Pedersen, T., Uncovering the hidden costs of offshoring: the interplay of complexity, organizational design, and experience. Strateg. Manag. J. 34:5 (2013), 533–552.
• Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., Sparks, J., The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9:3 (1998), 285–305.
• Laursen, K., Salter, A., Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 27:2 (2006), 131–150.
• Lavie, D., Miller, S.R., Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 19:4 (2008), 623–646.
• Leiblein, M.J., Miller, D.J., An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 24 (2003), 839–859.
• Leiponen, A., Helfat, C., Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strateg. Manag. J. 31:2 (2010), 224–236.
• Levy, D.L., Offshoring in the new global political economy. J. Manag. Stud. 42:3 (2005), 685–693.
• Lewin, A., Peeters, C., The top-line allure of offshoring. Harv. Bus. Rev. 84 (2006), 22–24.
• Lewin, A., Massini, S., Peeters, C., Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 40:6 (2009), 901–925.
• Lhuillery, S., Pfister, E., R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: empirical evidence from French CIS data. Res. Policy 38:1 (2009), 45–57.
• Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M., Ireland, R.D., Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Acad. Manag. 51:2 (2008), 315–334.
• Li, Y., Wei, Z., Liu, Y., Strategic orientations, knowledge acquisition, and firm performance: the perspective of the vendor in cross-border outsourcing. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 1457–1482.
• Linares-Navarro, Pedersen, T., Pla-Barber, J., Fine slicing of the value chain and offshoring of essential activities: empirical evidence from European multinationals. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 15:1 (2014), 111–134.
• Lokshin, B., Hagedoorn, J., Letterie, W., The bumpy road of technology partnerships: understanding causes and consequences of partnership mal-functioning. Res. Policy 40:2 (2011), 297–308.
• Lumineau, F., Malhotra, D., Shadow of the contract: how contract structures shape interfirm dispute resolution. Strateg. Manag. J. 32:5 (2011), 532–555.
• Madhok, A., Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction cost and the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 18:1 (1997), 39–61.
• Madhok, A., Tallman, S.B., Resources, transactions and rents: managing value in interfirm collaborative relationships. Organ. Sci. 9 (1998), 326–339.
• Malhotra, D., Murnighan, J.K., The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:3 (2002), 534–559.
• Manning, S., Massini, S., Lewin, C., A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: the global sourcing of science and engineering talent. Acad. Manag. Perspect.(August), 2008, 35–54.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García-Canal, Location, shared R&D suppliers and the performance of R&D outsourcing agreements. Ind. Innov. 25:3 (2018), 308–332.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García-Canal, The framing of knowledge transfers to shared R&D suppliers and its impact on innovation performance: a regulatory focus perspective. R&D Manag. 46:2 (2015), 354–368.
• Martínez-Noya, A., Garcia-Canal, E., Complejidad del intercambio, la dependencia de recursos y la subcontratación a largo plazo de servicios de I+D. Rev. Eur. Dir. Econ. Empres. 21:2 (2012), 191–204.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García Canal, E., Technological capabilities and the decision to outsource/outsource offshore R&D services. Int. Bus. Rev. 20:4 (2011), 264–277.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García-Canal, E., Características distintivas de la subcontratación de I+D en las empresas intensivas en tecnología. 2010, Universia Business Review, N. 26, segundo trimestre, 88–111.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García-Canal, E., Guillén, M.F., R&D outsourcing and the effectiveness of intangible relationship-specific investments: may proprietary knowledge be walking out the door?. J. Manag. Stud. 50:1 (2013), 67–91.
• Martínez-Noya, A., García-Canal, E., Guillén, M.F., International R&D service outsourcing by technology-intensive firms: whether and where?. J. Int. Manag. 18:1 (2012), 18–37.
• Maskell, P., Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., Dick-Nielsen, J., Learning paths to offshore outsourcing: from cost reduction to knowledge seeking. Ind. Innov. 143 (2007), 239–257.
• Mayer, K.J., Argyres, N.S., Learning to contract: evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. 15:4 (2004), 394–410.
• Mayer, K.J., Salomon, R.M., Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Manag. J. 49 (2006), 942–959.
• Mesquita, L., Anand, J., Brush, T.H., Comparing the resource-based and relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 29 (2008), 913–941.
• Miotti, E., Sachwald, F., Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Res. Policy 32:8 (2003), 1481–1499.
• Mol, M., Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch firms. Res. Policy 34 (2005), 571–582.
• Mol, M., van Tulder, R.J.M., Beije, P.R., Antecedents and performance consequences of international outsourcing. Int. Bus. Rev. 14 (2005), 599–617.
• Mol, M.J., Pauwels, P., Matthyssens, P., Quintens, L., A technological contingency perspective on the depth and scope of international outsourcing. J. Int. Manag. 10 (2004), 287–305.
• Monteiro, F., Mol, M., Birkinshaw, J., Ready to be open? Explaining the firm level barriers to benefiting from openness to external knowledge. Long Range Plan. 50:2 (2017), 282–295.
• Mooty, S., Kedia, B., R&D partnership portfolio strategies for breakthrough innovation: developing knowledge exchange capabilities. Culpan, R., (eds.) Open Innovation Through Strategic Alliances, 2014, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
• Mowery, D., Oxley, J., Silverman, B., Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strateg. Manag. J. 17:Winter Special Issue (1996), 77–91.
• Mudambi, S., Tallman, S., Make, buy or ally? Theoretical perspectives on knowledge process outsourcing through alliances. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 1434–1456.
• Mudambi, R., Venzin, M., The strategic nexus of offshoring and outsourcing decisions. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 1510–1533.
• Narula, R., Choosing between internal and non-internal R&D activities: some technological and economic factors. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 13 (2001), 365–388.
• Narula, R., Dunning, J., Explaining international R&D alliances and the role of governments. Int. Bus. Rev. 7 (1998), 377–397.
• Narula, R., Hagedoorn, J., Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation 19 (1999), 283–294.
• Narula, R., Martinez-Noya, A., International R&D alliances by firms: origins and development. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., (eds.) The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, 2015, Wiley-Blackwell.
• Narula, R., Sadowski, B., Technological catch-up and strategic technology partnering in developing countries. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 23 (2002), 599–617.
• Narula, R., Santangelo, G.D., Location and collocation advantages in international innovation. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 20:1 (2012), 6–25.
• Narula, R., Santangelo, G., Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry. Res. Policy 38 (2009), 393–403.
• Narula, R., Zanfei, A., Globalisation of innovation: the role of multinational enterprises. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R., (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005, Oxford University Press.
• Nicholls-Nixon, C., Woo, C., Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strateg. Manag. J. 24:7 (2003), 651–666.
• Nieto, M.J., Rodríguez, A., Offshoring of R&D: looking abroad to improve innovation performance. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 42:3 (2011), 345–361.
• Nieto, M.J., Santamaría, L., The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27:6 (2007), 367–377.
• Nooteboom, B., Haverbeke, W.V., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., Oord, A.V., Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 36:7 (2007), 1016–1034.
• Osborn, Baughn, Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Acad. Manag. J. 33:3 (1990), 503–519.
• Oxley, J.E., Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction cost approach. J. Law Econ. Organ. 13:2 (1997), 387–409.
• Oxley, J., Sampson, R., The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 25 (2004), 723–749.
• Oxley, J., Wada, T., Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: evidence from U.S.–Japan agreements. Manag. Sci. 55:4 (2009), 635–649.
• Pavitt, K., Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation. 1999, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Pisano, G., Teece, D., Collaborative arrangements and global technology strategy: some evidence from the telecommunications equipment industry. Rosenblum, R., (eds.) Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, vol. 4, 1989, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 227–256.
• Powell, W., Grodal, Networks of innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005, 56–85.
• Quinn, J.B., Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. Sloan Manag. Rev. 41:4 (2000), 13–28.
• Quintana García, C., Benavides Velasco, C.A., Concentraciones territoriales, alianzas estratégicas e innovación. Un enfoque de capacidades dinámicas. Cuad. Econ. Dir. Empres. 30 (2007), 5–38.
• Quintás, M.A., Vázquez, X.H., García, J.M., Caballero, G., Geographical amplitude in the international generation of technology: present situation and business determinants. Res. Policy 37:8 (2008), 1371–1381.
• Reuer, J.J., Ariño, A., Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strateg. Manag. J. 28:3 (2007), 313–330.
• Reuer, J.J., Lahiri, N., Searching for alliance partners: effects of geographic distance on the formation of R&D collaborations. Organ. Sci. 25:1 (2014), 283–298.
• Ring, P.S., Van de Ven, A.H., Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19:1 (1994), 90–118.
• Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S., Husted, K., Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: an empirical study. Technovation 35 (2015), 22–31.
• Rodríguez, A., Nieto, M.J., Does R&D offshoring lead to SME growth? Different governance modes and the mediating role of innovation. Strateg. Manag. J. 37 (2016), 1734–1753.
• Ryall, M.D., Sampson, R.C., Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: evidence from technology development projects. Manag. Sci. 55:6 (2009), 906–925.
• Sakakibara, M., Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects. Strateg. Manag. J. 23 (2002), 1033–1050.
• Santamaría, L., Nieto, M.J., Barge-Gil, A., The relevance of different open innovation strategies for R&D performers. Cuad. Econ. Dir. Empres. 13:45 (2010), 93–114.
• Santamaria, L., Surroca, J., Matching the goals and impacts of R&D collaboration. Eur. Manag. Rev. 8 (2011), 95–109.
• Santangelo, G.D., Meyer, K., Jindra, B., MNE subsidiaries’ outsourcing and insourcing of R&D: the role of local institutions. Glob. Strategy J., 2016, 10.1002/gsj.1137 Accepted manuscript online: 18.10.16.
• Schilling, M., Understanding the alliance data. Strateg. Manag. J. 30 (2009), 233–260.
• Shah, R., Swaminathan, V., Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: the moderating role of alliance context. Strateg. Manag. J. 29:5 (2008), 471–494.
• Suarez, M.V., García-Canal, E., Complementarity and leverage as drivers of the stock market reaction to global alliance formation. Long Range Plan. 36:6 (2003), 565–578.
• Surroca, J., Santamaría, L., La cooperación tecnológica como determinante de los resultados empresariales. Cuad. Econ. Dir. Empres. 33 (2007), 31–62.
• Tallman, S., Phene, A., Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organ. Sci. 18:2 (2007), 252–260.
• Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18:7 (1997), 509–533.
• Tether, B., Who cooperates for innovation and why: an empirical analysis. Res. Policy 31 (2002), 947–967.
• Tyler, B.B., Caner, T., New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: a behavioral perspective. Strateg. Manag. J. 37:5 (2016), 896–910.
• Un, C.A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Asakawa, K., R&D collaborations and product innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 27:5 (2010), 673–689.
• Uzzi, B., The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61 (1996), 674–698.
• Uzzi, B., Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42:1 (1997), 35–67.
• van Beers, C., Zand, F., R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31 (2014), 292–312.
• Van de Ven, A., Zahra, S.A., Boundary spanning, boundary objects, and innovation. Tell, F., Berggren, C., Brusoni, S., Van de Ven, A., (eds.) Book Chapter of Managing Knowledge Integration Across Boundaries, 2016, Oxford University Press.
• van Kranenburg, H., Hagedoorn, J., Lorenz-Orlean, S., Distance costs and the degree of inter-partner involvement in international relational-based technology alliances. Glob. Strategy J. 4 (2014), 280–291.
• Veugelers, R., Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Res. Policy 26 (1997), 303–315.
• von Hippel, E., Democratizing Innovation. 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Wang, Y., Rajagopalan, N., Alliance capabilities: review and research agenda. J. Manag. 41:1 (2014), 236–260.
• Weber, L., Mayer, K., Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective: investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty. Acad. Manag. Rev. 39:3 (2014), 344–363.
• Weber, L., Mayer, K., Designing effective contracts: exploring the influence of framing and expectations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36:1 (2011), 53–75.
• Weber, L., Mayer, K., Macher, T., An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: the importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Manag. J. 54:1 (2011), 182–202.
• Wernerfelt, B., A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5:2 (1984), 171–180.
• Williamson, O., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications. 1975, Free Press, New York.
• Woolthuis, R.K., Hillebrand, B., Nooteboom, B., Trust, contract and relationship development. Organ. Stud. 26:6 (2005), 813–840.
• Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C., The influence of technological knowledge base and the organizational structure on technology collaboration. J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), 679–704.
• Zaheer, A., Hernandez, E., Banerjee, S., Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organ. Sci. 21:5 (2010), 1072–1091.
• Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9:2 (1998), 123–141.
• Zaheer, A., Venkatraman, N., Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy an empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strateg. Manag. J. 16 (1995), 373–392.
• Zhao, M., Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Manag. Sci. 52:8 (2006), 1185–1199.
• Zollo, M., Winter, S.G., Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13:3 (2002), 339–351.