Gobernanza regional de la inversión extranjera directa en Canadá, España y Reino Unido

  1. María C. González Menéndez 1
  2. Almond, Phil 2
  3. Murray, Gregor 3
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Loughborough University
    info

    Loughborough University

    Loughborough, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/04vg4w365

  3. 3 University of Montreal
    info

    University of Montreal

    Montreal, Canadá

    ROR https://ror.org/0161xgx34

Journal:
REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

ISSN: 0210-5233

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 163

Pages: 3-20

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5477/CIS/REIS.163.3 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

Abstract

This paper examines how governance actors in regional business systems engage with foreign-owned multinational corporations which are present within their territory, in attempts to retain investment and link their regions to global production networks. This is done through a qualitative analysis of policy and practice in six sub-national regions in three advanced industrialized economies (Canada, Spain and the UK), thus permitting both international and intra-national comparisons. We find that while there are broad similarities in the types of governance mechanisms used, there are notable differences in the extent and intensity of forms of market, state and associational governance of foreign direct investment. These differences partly correspond to broader institutional differences in the nature of business systems, and partly to the socio-political construction of sub-national governance space.

Bibliographic References

  • Andersson, Ulf and Forsgren, Mats (2000). “In Search of Centre of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations”. Management International Review, 40: 329-350.
  • Birkinshaw, Julian (1996). “How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost”. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 467-495.
  • Coe, Neil; Hess, Marti; Yeung, Henry; Dicken, Peter and Henderson, Jeffrey (2004). “Globalizing Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29: 468-484.
  • Coller, Xavier; Edwards, Tony; Rees, Chris and Ortiz, Luis (2007). “Relaciones laborales en fusiones y adquisiciones transnacionales. Una aproximación política”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 120: 11-40.
  • Coller, Xavier; Edwards, Tony and Rees, Chris (1999). “Difusión e isomorfismo en las organizaciones. El caso de las multinacionales”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 86: 79-94.
  • Crouch, Colin (2005). Capitalist Diversity and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Foss, Nicolai J. and Pedersen, Torben (2002). “Transferring Knowledge in MNCs: The Role of Sources of Subsidiary Knowledge and Organizational Context”. Journal of International Management, 8: 49-67.
  • Hall, Peter and Soskice, David (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Herrigel, Gary and Zeitlin, Jonathan (2010). “Interfirm Relations in Global Manufacturing: Disintegrated Production and its Globalisation”. In: Morgan, G. et al. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holm, Ulf; Malmberg, Anders and Sölvell, Örjan (2003). “Subsidiary Impact on Host-country Economies —the Case of Foreign-owned Subsidiaries Attracting Investment into Sweden”. Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 389-408.
  • Jessop, Bob (1993). “Towards a Schumpetarian Workfare State? Prelimiary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy”. Studies in Political Economy, 40: 7-39.
  • Kristensen, Peer H. and Morgan, Glenn (2007). “Multinationals and Institutional Competitiveness”. Regulation and Governance, 1: 197-212.
  • Marcussen, Martin and Kaspersen, Lars B. (2007). “Globalization and Institutional Competitiveness”. Regulation and Governance, 1: 183-196.
  • Morgan, Glenn and Kristensen, Peer H. (2006). “The Contested Space of Multinationals: Varieties of Institutionalism, Varieties of Capitalism”. Human Relations, 59: 1467-1490.
  • Pedersen, Ove K. (2010). “Institutional Competitiveness: How Nations Came to Compete”. In: Morgan, G. et al. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Phelps, Nicholas A.; Mackinnon, Danny; Stone, Ian and Braidford, Paul (2003). “Embedding the Multinationals? Institutions and the Development of Overseas Manufacturing Affiliates in Wales and North East England”. Regional Studies, 37: 27-40.
  • Phelps, Nicholas and Fuller, Cris (2001). “Taking Care of Business: After-care and the State-MNE Nexus in Wales”. Environment and Planning C, 19: 817-832.
  • Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1985). “Community, Market, State - and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order”. European Sociological Review, 1: 119-138.
  • White, Mark C. (2004). “Inward Investment, Firm Embeddedness and Place: An Assessment of Ireland’s Multinational Software Sector”. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11: 243-260.
  • Whitley, Richard (1999). Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.