Study of accuracy and grammatical complexity in EFL writing

  1. Lahuerta, Ana Cristina 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
IJES: international journal of English studies

ISSN: 1578-7044

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: Open Issue

Volumen: 18

Número: 1

Páginas: 71-89

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/IJES/2018/1/258971 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: IJES: international journal of English studies

Resumen

The present study seeks to compare the writing products of EFL undergraduates using as measures accuracy and grammatical complexity. It also intends to describe the evolution of the morphological and syntactic errors as English is used by learners. A total of 100 learners of English as a foreign language participated in the study. They were divided into two groups according to their Oxford Placement Test score: group A was formed by 36 advanced students; and group B was made up of 64 upper intermediate students. Compositions were collected as the basis of this study.  Results show that upper intermediate students exhibited a higher error mean in each of the error categories, namely, grammatical morphemes, lexical choice and syntax, as well as punctuation and spelling. However, an analysis of variance shows the differences between groups to be significant only in spelling errors and in punctuation errors.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Altenberg, B. & Tapper, M. (1998). The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 80–93). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17-34.
  • Barfield, A. (2007). An exploration of second language collocation knowledge and development. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Swansea, United Kingdom.
  • Brown, R. W. & Fraser, C. (1964). The Acquisition of Syntax. In U. Bellugi & R. Brown (Eds.), The Acquisition of Language. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development (pp. 43-79). New York.
  • Chan, A.Y.W. (2010). Toward a taxonomy of written errors: Investigation into the written errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 295-319.
  • Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 161-179.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dipolog-Ubanan, G. (2016). L1 influence on writing in L2 among UCSI Chinese students: A case study. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4), 1835-1847.
  • Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
  • Godfrey, L. & Treacy, C. (2014). Change in French second language writing in study abroad and domestic contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 48-65.
  • Hamed, M. (2014). Conjunctions in argumentative writing of Libyan tertiary students. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 108-120.
  • Hawkins, J. & Buttery, P. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1, 1–23.
  • Homburg, T.J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 87-107.
  • Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A. & Storch, N. (2014). Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university? Assessing Writing, 21, 1-17.
  • Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., Oon, S. P. & Storch, N. (2015). What happens to ESL students’ writing after three years of study at an English medium university? Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 39-52.
  • Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48–60.
  • Lahuerta Martínez, A. (2016). Uso de las conjunciones en las composiciones de estudiantes de programas bilingües y no bilingües. Revista de Educación, 371, 107-125.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Assessing global second language proficiency. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom Oriented Research (pp. 287-304). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
  • Laufer, B. & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A Corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672.
  • Narita, M., Sato, C. & Sugiura, M. (2004). Connector usage in the English essay writing of Japanese EFL Learners. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Portugal, May, 26-28.
  • Nicolás-Conesa, F., Roca de Larios J. & Coyle, Y. (2014). Development of EFL students’ mental models of writing and their effects on performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 1–19.
  • Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York & London: Routledge.
  • Polio, C. & Shea, M.C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10-27.
  • R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.
  • Tedick, D. J. (1990). ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 123–143.
  • Thewissen, J. (2012). Accuracy across proficiency levels: insights from an error-tagged EFL learner corpus. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain‐la‐Neuve, Belgium.
  • Thewissen, J. (2013). Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns: Insights from an error‐tagged EFL learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 77-101.
  • Thewissen, J. (2015). Accuracy across Proficiency Levels: A Learner Corpus Approach (Corpora and Language in Use). Belgium: UCL Press.
  • Van Geert, P. & Steenbeek, H. (2005). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to development assessment, modelling and research. In K. W. Fischer, A. Battro & P. Lena (Eds.), Mind, Brain, and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wei-yu Chen, C. (2006). The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 113-130.
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. (1998). Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet