Estimating product efficiency through a hedonic pricing best practice frontier

  1. Rubén Arrondo 1
  2. Nuria García 1
  3. Eduardo González 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444 2340-9436

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: New frontiers for productivity research in management and business

Volumen: 21

Número: 4

Páginas: 215-224

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2018.08.005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Business Research Quarterly

Resumen

Una decisión crítica compleja en marketing y economía es la fijación de precios. Encontrar el precio correcto para un producto requiere una evaluación cuidadosa de los atributos del producto. La evaluación de la eficiencia del producto establece el atractivo relativo de un producto, en comparación con los atributos y precios observables de los productos competidores. La principal contribución de este documento es combinar la fijación de precios hedónicos con el análisis de fronteras para estimar la eficiencia del producto, que es un enfoque novedoso. Aplicamos este método al mercado de zapatillas para correr. Encontramos cuatro atributos como principales impulsores del precio: estabilidad, amortiguación, flexibilidad y respuesta. El modelo también identifica productos con precios excesivos y predice las reducciones de precio necesarias para ser comparativamente competitivo, un requisito previo para el desempeño comercial general. Nuestros resultados muestran la dinámica de los ajustes de precios en el mercado. Los productos con precios excesivos ajustan los precios a la baja rápidamente y obtienen un atractivo comparativo. Otro hallazgo interesante es que la eficiencia del producto se correlaciona fuertemente con las evaluaciones realizadas por expertos independientes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahmadi-Esfahani, F.Z., Stanmore, R.G., Export demand for attributes of Australian wheat in Asia and the Middle East. Food Policy 22:2 (1997), 145–154.
  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C.K., Schmidt, P., Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econom. 61 (1977), 21–37.
  • Akpoyomare, O., Adeosun, L., Ganiyu, R., The influence of product attributes on consumer purchase decision in the Nigerian food and beverages industry: a study of Lagos Metropolis. Am. J. Bus. Manag. 1:4 (2012), 196–201.
  • Allenby, G.M., Brazell, J.D., Howell, J.R., Rossi, P.E., Economic valuation of product features. Quant. Mark. Econ. 12:4 (2014), 421–456.
  • Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., McMillan, R., A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. J. Polit. Econ. 115:4 (2007), 588–638.
  • Bello, A.K., Moruf, A., Does the functional form matter in the estimation of hedonic price model for housing market?. Soc. Sci. 5 (2010), 559–564.
  • Berndt, E.R., Rappaport, N.J., Price and quality of desktop and mobile personal computers: a quarter-century historical overview. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:2 (2001), 268–273.
  • Berndt, E.R., Griliches, Z., Rappaport, N.J., Econometric estimates of price indexes for personal computers in the 1990's. J. Econom. 68:1 (1995), 243–268.
  • Berry, B.J., Bednarz, R., A hedonic model of prices and assessments for single family homes in Chicago: does the assessor follow the market or the market follow the assessor?. Land Econ. 51:1 (1975), 21–40.
  • Black, S.E., Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Q. J. Econ. 114:2 (1999), 577–599.
  • Chinloy, P.T., Hedonic price and depreciation indexes for residential housing: a longitudinal approach. J. Urban Econ. 4:4 (1977), 469–482.
  • Chwelos, P.D., Berndt, E.R., Cockburn, I.M., Faster, smaller, cheaper: an hedonic price analysis of PDAs. Appl. Econ. 40:22 (2008), 2839–2856.
  • Clapp, J.M., Giaccotto, C., Price indices based on the hedonic repeat-sales method: application to the housing market. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 16:1 (1998), 5–26.
  • Cohen, J.P., Coughlin, C.C., Spatial hedonic models of airport noise, proximity, and housing prices. J. Reg. Sci. 48:5 (2008), 859–878.
  • Dalen, J.V., Bode, B., Quality-corrected price indices: the case of the Dutch new passenger car market, 1990–1999. Appl. Econ. 36:11 (2004), 1169–1197.
  • Darby, M.R., Karni, E., Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econ. 16 (1973), 67–86.
  • Dewentet, R., Haucap, J., Luthar, R., Rotzel, P., Hedonic prices in the German market for mobile phone. Telecommun. Policy 31 (2007), 4–13.
  • Dulberger, E.R., The application of a hedonic model to a quality-adjusted price index for computer processors. Jorgenson, D.W., Landau, R., (eds.) Technology and Capital Formation, 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 37–75.
  • González, E., Arrondo, R., Cárcaba, A., Product innovation in the Spanish auto market: frontier shift and catching-up effects. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 50 (2017), 170–181.
  • González, E., Cárcaba, A., Ventura, J., How car dealers adjust prices to reach the product efficiency frontier in the Spanish automobile market. OMEGA 51:1 (2015), 38–48.
  • Goodman, A.C., Hedonic prices, price indices and housing markets. J. Urban Econ. 5:4 (1978), 471–484.
  • Gouriéroux, C., Laferrère, A., Managing hedonic housing price indexes: the French experience. J. Hous. Econ. 18:3 (2009), 206–213.
  • Griliches, Z., Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: an econometric of quality change. The Price Statistics of the Federal Government, 1961, NBER, 173–196.
  • Harris, J.M., The impact of food product characteristics on consumer purchasing behavior: the case of frankfurters. J. Food Distrib. Res. 28 (1997), 92–97.
  • Harrison, D., Rubinfeld, D.L., Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 5:1 (1978), 81–102.
  • Hill, R.J., Melser, D., Hedonic imputation and the price index problem: an application to housing. Econ. Inq. 46:4 (2008), 593–609.
  • Kalyanam, K., McAteer, J., Marek, J., Hodges, J., Lifeng, L., Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com. Quant. Mark. Econ., 2017, 10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7 (forthcoming, online first).
  • Karato, K., Movshuk, O., Shimizu, C., Semiparametric model of hedonic housing prices in Japan. Asian Econ. J. 29:4 (2015), 325–345.
  • Keller, K.L., Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 57:1 (1993), 1–22.
  • Kim, C.W., Phipps, T.T., Anselin, L., Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45 (2003), 24–39.
  • Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Cámara, D., Cruz, I., Marketing. 2004, Pearson Prentice Hall, Madrid, España.
  • Ladd, G.W., Suvannunt, V., A model of consumer goods characteristics. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 58:3 (1976), 504–510.
  • Lancaster, K.J., A new approach to consumer theory. J. Polit. Econ. 74:2 (1966), 132–157.
  • María Angulo, A., María Gil, J., Gracia, A., Sánchez, M., Hedonic prices for Spanish red quality wine. Br. Food J. 102:7 (2000), 481–493.
  • Matas, A., Raymond, J.L., Hedonic prices for cars: an application to the Spanish car market, 1981–2005. Appl. Econ. 41:22 (2009), 2887–2904.
  • McMillen, D., Redfearn, C.L., Estimation and hypothesis testing for nonparametric hedonic house price functions. J. Reg. Sci. 50:3 (2010), 712–733.
  • Moon, W., Florkowski, W.J., Beuchat, L.R., Resurreccion, A.V., Chinnan, M.S., Paraskova, P., Jordanov, J., Effects of product attributes and consumer characteristics on attitude and behavior: the case of peanuts in a transition economy. Agribusiness 15:3 (1999), 411–425.
  • Morgan, K.J., Metzen, E.J., Johnson, S.R., An hedonic index for breakfast cereals. J. Consumer Res. 6:1 (1979), 67–75.
  • Murray, J., Sarantis, N., Price-quality relations and hedonic price indexes for cars in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Econ. Bus. 6 (1999), 5–27.
  • Nelson, P.J., Information and consumer behaviour. J. Polit. Econ. 78:2 (1970), 311–329.
  • Nerlove, M., Hedonic price functions and the measurement of preferences: the case of Swedish wine consumers. Eur. Econ. Rev. 39:9 (1995), 1697–1716.
  • Oczkowski, E., A hedonic price function for Australian premium table wine. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 38:1 (1994), 93–110.
  • Oczkowski, E., Hedonic wine price functions with different prices. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 60:2 (2015), 196–211.
  • Olson, J.C., Kanwar, R., Muderrisoglu, A., Clarifying the confusion regarding salience, importance, and determinant concepts in multiattribute attitude research. Neil Beckwith, et al. (eds.) Conference Proceedings, 1979, American Marketing Association, Chicago, 286–290.
  • Ortuzar-Gana, J.C., Alfranca-Burriel, O., Current and regular prices hedonic models for the wine industry. Span. J. Agric. Res. 8:4 (2010), 873–886.
  • Pakes, A., A reconsideration of hedonic price indexes with an application to PC's. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:5 (2003), 1578–1596.
  • Palmquist, R.B., Estimating the demand for the characteristics of housing. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1984, 394–404.
  • Requena-Silvente, F., Walker, J., Calculating hedonic price indices with unobserved product attributes: an application to the UK car market. Economica 73:291 (2006), 509–532.
  • Samikwa, D.D., Brorsen, B.W., Sanders, L.D., Hedonic prices of Malawi burley tobacco. The International Food and Agribusiness. Manag. Rev. 1:1 (1998), 107–117.
  • Shamsher, R., The importance of product attributes influencing purchase decision: a comparative study between FMCG laundry soaps. D.U. J. Mark. 15 (2014), 231–244.
  • Shi, H., Price, D.W., Impacts of sociodemographic variables on the implicit values of breakfast cereal characteristics. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 23 (1998), 126–139.
  • Stanley, L.R., Tschirhart, J., Hedonic prices for a nondurable good: the case of breakfast cereals. Rev. Econ. Stat., 73(3), 1991, 537.
  • Triplett, J.E., Automobiles and hedonic quality measurement. J. Polit. Econ. 77:3 (1969), 408–417.
  • Yu, K., Prud'homme, M., Econometric issues in hedonic price indices: the case of internet service providers. Appl. Econ. 42 (2010), 1973–1994.