Estudio de los mecanismos de escritura en niños españoles de Educación Primaria

  1. Nagore González-Martín 1
  2. Paz Suárez-Coalla 1
  3. Olivia Afonso
  4. Fernando Cuetos 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702 1578-4126

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 40

Número: 1

Páginas: 102-119

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2016.1263448 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

Resumen

Numerosos estudios realizados en sistemas de ortografía profunda muestran las variables que influyen sobre las latencias de escritura a lo largo del aprendizaje. En ortografías transparentes como el castellano son escasos los estudios sobre escritura que recojan medidas de latencias y duración de la escritura. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue profundizar en el conocimiento de los mecanismos de escritura utilizados por niños españoles de Educación Primaria, a partir del estudio de los errores, las latencias y la duración de la escritura de palabras. Para ello, 60 niños realizaron una tarea de copia y otra de dictado de palabras regulares con diferente frecuencia y longitud. Los resultados obtenidos muestran cambios en los mecanismos de escritura utilizados por los niños a medida que se hacen más expertos, como indica el mayor efecto de la longitud de las palabras en los primeros cursos. Ese efecto de longitud es más determinante por el número de letras que por el número de sílabas de las palabras. Estos resultados tienen importantes implicaciones en la enseñanza de la escritura en castellano.

Información de financiación

Financiadores

  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad del Gobierno de España
    • PSI2015-64174-P

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Afonso, O., & Alvarez, C. (2011). Efectos de la frecuencia silábica en la producción escrita del español. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y aAudiología, 31, 33–38. doi:10.1016/S0214-4603(11)70169-3[Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Alegría, J., & Carrillo, S. (2014). Learning to spell words in Spanish: A comparative analysis. Studies in Psychology, 25, 476–501. doi:10.1080/02109395.2014.978544[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Alegría, J., Marín, J., Carrillo, S., & Mousty, P. (2003). Les premiers pas dans l’acquisition de l’orthographe en fonction du caractère profond ou superficiel du système alphabétique: Comparaison entre le français et l’espagnol. In M. N. Romdhane, J. E. Gombert, & M. Belajouza (Eds.), L’apprentissage de la lecture: Perspective comparative interlangues (pp. 51–67). Tunis, Tunisia: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. [Google Scholar]
  • Álvarez, C. J., Cottrell, D., & Afonso, O. (2009). Writing dictated words and picture names: Syllabic boundaries affect execution in Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 205–223. doi:10.1017/S0142716409090092[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2000). Written picture naming: What representations are activated and when? Memory & Cognition, 28, 677–689. doi:10.3758/BF03201257[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., & Roux, S. (2015). Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1268–1294. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.978877[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Carrillo, M., Alegría, J., & Marín, J. (2013). On the acquisition of some basic word spelling mechanism in a deep (French) and a shallow (Spanish) system. Reading and Writing, 26, 799–819. doi:10.1007/S11145-013-9391-6[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes? Reading and Writing, 7, 9–22. doi:10.1007/BF01026945[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671. doi:10.3758/BF03192738[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Defior, S., & Serrano, F. (2005). The initial development of spelling in Spanish: From global to analytical. Reading and Writing, 18, 81–98. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5893-1[Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  • Ehri, L. C. (1992). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In S. Templeton, & D. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  • Goswami, T., Gombert, J., & Barrera, L. (1998). Children´s orthographic representation and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010560[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Guinet, E., & Kandel, S. (2010). Ductus: A software package for the study of handwriting production. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 326–332. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.326[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Halsband, U., & Lange, R. K. (2006). Motor learning in man: A review of functional and clinical studies. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99, 414–424. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Jiménez, J., O’Shanahan, I., Tabraue, M., Artiles, C., Muñetón, M., Guzmán, R. … Rojas, E. (2008). Evolución de la escritura de palabras de ortografía arbitraria en lengua española. Psicothema, 20, 786–794.[PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147. doi:10.1017/S0142716400004380[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., Alvarez, C., & Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 18–31. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.18[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., Hérault, L., Grosjacques, G., Lambert, E., & Fayol, M. (2009). Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Cognition, 110, 440–444. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.001[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., & Perret, C. (2015). How do movements to produce letters become automatic during writing acquisition? Investigating the development of motor anticipation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 113–120. doi:10.1177/0165025414557532[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., & Soler, O. (2010). Differential syllable effects when learning to write French and Catalan words. Current Psychology Letters: Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, 25, 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2005). The effect of orthographic regularity on children’s handwriting production. Current Psychology Letters: Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, 17, 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2006a). Syllables as functional units in a copying task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 432–452. doi:10.1080/01690960400018378[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel, S., & Valdois, S. (2006b). French and Spanish- speaking children use different visual motor units during spelling acquisition. Language and Cognitive processes, 21, 531–561. doi:10.1080/01690960500095946[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Katz, R. B. (1991). Limited retention of information in the graphemic buffer. Cortex, 27, 111–119. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80274-2[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 952–977. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.001[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Martinet, C., Valdois, S., & Fayol, M. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of literacy acquisition. Cognition, 91, B11–B22. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.002[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Mousty, P., & Alegria, J. (1996). L´acquisition de l´orthographe et ses troubles. In S. Carbonnel, P. Guillet, M.-S. Martory, & S. Valdois (Eds.), Approche cognitive des troubles de la lecture et de l´ écriture chez l´enfant et l´adulte (pp. 165–179). Marseille: SOLAL Collection Neuropsychologie. [Google Scholar]
  • Notarnicola, A., Angelelli, P., Judica, A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2012). Development of spelling skills in a shallow othography: The case of Italian language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1171–1194. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9312-0[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenmblum, S., Parush, S., & Weiss, P. L. (2003). The in air phenomenon: Temporal and spatial correlates of the handwriting process. Perpetual & Motor Skills, 96, 933–954. doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.3.933[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez Abchi, V., Diuk, B., Borzone, A. M., & Ferroni, M. (2009). El desarrollo de la escritura de palabras en español: Interacción entre el conocimiento fonológico y ortográfico. Interdisciplinaria, 26, 95–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self- teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Signorini, A., & De Manrique, A. M. B. (2003). Aprendizaje de la lectura y escritura en español. El predominio de las estrategias fonológicas. Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 20, 5–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Soler, O., & Kandel, S. (2012). A longitudinal study of handwriting skills in pre-schoolers: The acquisition of syllable oriented programming strategies. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 151–162. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9251-1[Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four- year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00024-9[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L., & Bonet, P. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 134–165. doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2422[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, B. C. (2004). Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10, 122–131. doi:10.1080/13554790409609943[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  • Tressoldi, P. (1996). L’ evoluzione della lettura e della scrittura dalla 2ª elementare alla 3ª media. Età evolutiva, 35, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Valle, F. (1989). Errores en lectura y escritura: Un modelo dual. Cognitiva, 2, 35–63. [Google Scholar]