Regional Policy In The Eu Less Favoured Regions For The Period 2000-2006An Assessment Of The Expenditure Allocation And Governance

  1. Margarita ARGUELLES 1
  2. Carmen BENAVIDES 1
  3. Matias MAYOR 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Estudios Economicos Regionales y Sectoriales : EERS: Regional and sectoral economic studies : RSES

ISSN: 1578-4460

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 11

Número: 1

Páginas: 63-80

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Estudios Economicos Regionales y Sectoriales : EERS: Regional and sectoral economic studies : RSES

Resumen

The European Union regional policy is targeting to strength internal cohesion, seeking to improve the performance of the whole territory but with special emphasis on the less favored regions. In this paper we analyze the effectiveness of the Structural Funds in Objective 1 regions during the programming period, 2000-2006. Firstly, the EU expenditure is divided into seven categories, with the aim to identify which of them show a positive and real contribution to growth. Secondly, we test the existence of a national influence on the regional capability to take advantage from Structural Funds. Finally, we show how this country effect is related to the quality of governance of each country.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91: 1369-1401.
  • Arbia G, Battisti M, Di Vaio, G (2010) Institutions and Geography: Empirical Test of Spatial Growth Models for European Regions. Economic Modelling 27-1: 12-21.
  • Bachtler J, Wren C (2006) Evaluation of European Union Cohesion Policy: Research Questions and Policy Challenges. Regional Studies 40-2:143-153.
  • Beugelsdijk M, Eijffinger S C W (2005) The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: an Empirical Analysis for EU 15 in 1995-2001. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43-1: 33-51.
  • Boldrin M, Canova F (2001) Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy 32: 207-253.
  • Bradley J (2006) Evaluating the Impact of European Union Cohesion Policy in Less-Developed Countries and Regions. Regional Studies 40-2: 189-199.
  • Bradley J, Untiedt G (2008) EU cohesion policy and "conditional" effectiveness: what do crosssection regressions tell us? GEFRA Working Paper: May 2008 - Nr. 4. Münster: GEFRA - Gesellschaft für Finanz- und Regionalanalysen.
  • Cappelen A, Castellacci F, Fagerberg J, Verspagen B (2003) The Impact of EU Regional Support on Growth and Convergence in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 41-4: 621-644.
  • Chatterji M, Dewhurst, JHL (1996) Convergence Clubs and Relative Economic Performance in Great Britain: 1977-1991. Regional Studies 30-1: 31-39.
  • Cheshire P, Magrini S (2009) Urban growth drivers in a Europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 85-115.
  • Dall'erba S, Le Gallo J (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989-1999: A spatial econometric analysis, Papers in Regional Science 87-2: 219-244
  • Ederveen S, De Groot HLF, Nahuis R (2006) Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy, Kyklos 59-1: 17-42
  • European Commission (2007) Growing Regions, growing Europe. Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Gardiner B, Martin R, Tyler P (2005) Regional Dimensions of Europe's Growth Problem: Some Brief Reflections on the Sapir Report. Regional Studies 39-7: 979-986.
  • Gripaios P, Bishop P, Hart T, McVittie E (2008) Analysing the impact of Objective 1 funding in Europe: a review. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 499-524.
  • Knack S, Keefer P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207-227.
  • Le Gallo J, Dall'erba S (2006) Evaluating the Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of the European Convergence Process, 1980-1999. Journal of Regional Science 46-2: 269-288.
  • Le Gallo J, Dall'erba S (2008) Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989-1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science 87-2: 219-244.
  • Leonardi R (2006) Cohesion in the European Union. Regional Studies 40-2:155-166.
  • Milio S (2007) Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence from Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy, Regional Studies 41-4: 429-442
  • Ramajo J, Marquez MA, Hewings GJD, Salinas MM (2008) Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: Do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions?. European Economic Review 52: 551-567.
  • Rodríguez-Pose A, Fratesi U. (2004) Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions. Regional Studies 38-1: 97-113.
  • Spanish Ministry of Economics Affairs: http://www.dgfc.sgpg.meh.es/indexPrevio.jsp?Pag=2.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet