3x2 classroom goal structures, motivational regulations, self-concept, and affectivity in secondary school

  1. Antonio Méndez-Giménez 1
  2. José-Antonio Cecchini-Estrada 1
  3. Javier Fernández-Río 1
  4. José Antonio Prieto Saborit 1
  5. David Méndez-Alonso 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 20

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2017.37 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

The main objective was to analyze relationships and predictive patterns between 3x2 classroom goal structures (CGS), and motivational regulations, dimensions of self-concept, and affectivity in the context of secondary education. A sample of 1,347 secondary school students (56.6% young men, 43.4% young women) from 10 different provinces of Spain agreed to participate (M age = 13.43, SD = 1.05). Hierarchical regression analyses indicated the self-approach CGS was the most adaptive within the spectrum of self-determination, followed by the task-approach CGS. The other-approach CGS had an ambivalent influence on motivation. Task-approach and self-approach CGS predicted academic self-concept (p < .01; p < .001, respectively; R 2 = .134), and both along with other-approach CGS (negatively) predicted family self-concept (p < .05; p < .001; p < .01, respectively; R 2 = .064). Physical self-concept was predicted by the task-approach and other-approach CGS’s (p < .05; p < .001, respectively; R 2 = .078). Finally, positive affect was predicted by all three approach-oriented CGS’s (p < .001; R 2 = .137), whereas negative affect was predicted by other-approach (positively) and self-approach (negatively) CGS (p < .001; p < .05, respectively; R 2 = .028). These results expand the 3x2 achievement goal framework to include environmental factors, and reiterate that teachers should focus on raising levels of self- and task-based goals for students in their classes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Ames C., & Archer J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
  • Anderman L. H. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging, and social goals as predictors of students’ positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 89–103.
  • Cecchini-Estrada J. A., Fernández-Losa J. L., González C., Fernández-Río J., & Méndez-Giménez A. (2012). La caída de la motivación autodeterminada en jóvenes escolares [The drop in self-determined motivation in young students]. Sport TK. Revista Euroamericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 1(1), 25–31.
  • Ciani K. D., Middleton M. J., Summers J. J., & Sheldon K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2009.11.001
  • Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Contreras O. R., Fernández J. G., García L. M., Palau P., & Pontesi J. (2010). El autoconcepto físico y su relación con la práctica deportiva en estudiantes adolescentes [Physical self-concept and its relation to sport practice in adolescent students]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 19(1), 23–39.
  • Dinger F. C., Dickhäuser O., Spinath B., & Steinmayr R. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of students’ achievement goals: A mediation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.lindif.2013.09.005
  • Diseth A. (2015). The advantages of task-based and other-based achievement goals as standards of competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.011
  • Elliot A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
  • Elliot A. J., & McGregor H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  • Elliot A. J., Murayama K., & Pekrun R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
  • Fischer N., & Rustemeyer R. (2007). The impact of perceived teacher behavior on motivational development in mathematics. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie, 21, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.21.2.135
  • Fuentes M. C., García J. F., Gracia E., & Lila M. (2011). Autoconcepto y ajuste psicosocial en la adolescencia [Self-concept and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence]. Psicothema, 23(1), 7–12.
  • García F., & Musitu G. (1999). AF5: Autoconcepto Forma 5 [Self-concept Form 5]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
  • García J. F., Musitu G., Riquelme E., & Riquelme P. (2011). A confirmatory factor analysis of the “Autoconcepto Forma 5” questionnaire in young adults from Spain and Chile. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 648–658. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.13
  • González-Pienda J. A., Núñez J. C., Álvarez L., GonzálezPumariega S., Roces C., González P., … Bernardo A. (2002). Inducción parental a la autorregulación, autoconcepto y rendimiento académico [Parental inducement of self-regulation, self-concept, and academic achievement]. Psicothema, 14, 853–860.
  • Grant H., & Dweck C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.85.3.541
  • Gray D. L., Chang Y., & Anderman E. M. (2015). Conditional effects of mastery goal structure on changes in students’ motivational beliefs: Need for cognition matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 9–21. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.025
  • Hair J. F., Ringle C. M., & Sarstedt M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.lrp.2013.01.001
  • Hulleman C. S., Schrager S. M., Bodman S. M., & Harackiewicz J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0018947
  • Kaplan A., & Midgley C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80005-9
  • Lau S., & Nie Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.15
  • Lemos M. S., Gonçalves T., Lens W., & Rodrigues L. P. (2014). The nature and dimensions of achievement goals: Mastery, evaluation, competition, and self-presentation goals. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–13. https:// doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.77
  • Mascret N., Elliot A. J., & Cury F. (2015). Extending the 3 x 2 achievement goal model to the sport domain: The 3 x 2 achievement goal questionnaire for sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.psychsport.2014.11.001
  • Meece J. L., Anderman E. M., & Anderman L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych. 56.091103.070258
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Cecchini-Estrada J. A., & FernándezRío J. (2014a). Examinando el modelo de metas de logro 3x2 en el contexto de la Educación Física [Examining the 3x2 achievement goal model in the context of Physical Education]. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 14, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1578-84232014000300017
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Cecchini-Estrada J. A., & FernándezRío J. (2014b). Perfiles motivacionales y dominancia de metas de logro en Educación Física [Motivational profiles and achievement goal dominance in Physical Education]. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–8. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/sjp.2014.37
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Cecchini-Estrada J. A., FernándezRío J., Méndez-Alonso D., & Prieto J. A. (2017). Metas de logro 3x2, motivación autodeterminada y satisfacción con la vida en Educación Secundaria [3x2 achievement goals, self-determined motivation and life satisfaction in Secondary School]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.15035
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Cecchini-Estrada J. A., MéndezAlonso D., Prieto J. A., & Fernández-Río J. (in press). Efecto de las metas de logro y las estructuras de metas de clase 3x2 en la motivación autodeterminada: Un análisis multinivel en educación secundaria [Effect of achievement goals and classroom goal structures on self-determined motivation: A multilevel analysis in secondary school]. Anales de Psicología.
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Fernández-Río J., & Cecchini-Estrada J. A. (2013). Papel importante del alumnado, necesidades psicológicas básicas, regulaciones motivacionales y physical self-concept en educación física [Student’ [sic] important role, basic psychological needs, motivational regulations, and physical self-concept in physical education setting]. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 13(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.4321/S157884232013000100008
  • Méndez-Giménez A., Fernández-Río J., & Cecchini-Estrada J. A. (2017). Validación del Cuestionario de Clima Motivacional 3x2 en Educación Física [Validation of the 3x2 Motivational Climate in Physical Education Questionnaire]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Midgley C., Maehr M. L., Hruda L. Z., Anderman E., Anderman L., Freeman K. E., … Urdan T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Murayama K., & Elliot A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014221
  • Núñez J. L., Martín-Albo J., Navarro J. G., & Suárez Z. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la versión española de la Escala de Motivación Educativa en estudiantes de educación secundaria postobligatoria [Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Academic Motivation Scale in post-compulsory secondary education students]. Estudios de Psicología, 31(1), 89–100.
  • Peng S. L., & Cherng B. L. (2005). The relationship among a 4-dimensional classroom goal structure, personal goal orientation and academic help-seeking behavior. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 50, 69–95.
  • Robles R., & Páez F. (2003). Estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS) [Study about the Spanish translation and psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS)]. Salud Mental, 26(1), 69–75.
  • Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2002). Overview of selfdetermination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
  • Sandín B. (2003). The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect for children and adolescents (PANASN). Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 8, 173–182.
  • Shavelson R. J., Hubner J. J., & Stanton G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. https://doi. org/10.3102/00346543046003407
  • Urbán G., Orosz G., Kerepes L., & Jánvári M. I. (2014). A 3×2 teljesítés-cél kérdőív Magyar nyelvű adaptációja [Hungarian adaptation of the 3×2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire]. Pszichológia, 34(1), 73–97. https://doi. org/10.1556/Pszicho.34.2014.1.4
  • Urdan T. (2010). The challenges and promise of research on classroom goal structure. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling and human development (1st Ed., pp. 92–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Urdan T., & Midgley C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0361-476X(02)00060-7
  • Urdan T., & Schoenfelder E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jsp.2006.04.003
  • Vallerand R. J., Pelletier L. G., Blais M. R., Briere N. M., Senecal C. B., & Vallieres É. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0013164492052004025
  • Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.54.6.1063
  • Wolters C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet