Un análisis internacional de la política retributiva del CEO

  1. Rubén Arrondo García
  2. Carlos Fernández Méndez
Journal:
Universia Business Review

ISSN: 1698-5117

Year of publication: 2014

Issue: 43

Pages: 36-57

Type: Article

More publications in: Universia Business Review

Abstract

This paper analyses from an international perspective the compensation of the chief executive officer (CEO) for a sample of listed companies in 2010. Our main results suggest that there are significant differences in both the amount and the structure of the CEO’s compensation in the ten countries surveyed; being the main difference the more intense use of long term variable compensation formulae in the US as compared to the prevalent use of short term variable compensation components in Europe. Interestingly enough, we have not reported significant differences between the CEO’s compensation in the financial and non-financial sectors. Finally, we note a relevant influence of the ownership and corporate governance structure on CEO compensation.

Bibliographic References

  • Aggarwal, R.K. (2008): “Executive compensation and incentives”, In Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, ed. BE Eckbo, p. 497-538. Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North-Holland.
  • Beatty, R. E.; Zajac, E. J. (1994): “Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, p. 313–335.
  • Bebchuk, L. A.; Fried, J. M. (2003): “Executive compensation as an agency problem”, Nº. w9813, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bebchuk, L. A.; Fried, J. M. (2004):”Pay without performance” (Vol. 278). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cadman, B.; Klasa, S.; Matsunaga, S. (2010): “Determinants of CEO pay: a comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp firms”, Accounting Review, Vol. 85, p. 1.511-1.543.
  • Chhaochharia, V.; Grinstein, Y. (2009): “CEO compensation and board structure”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 64, p. 231-261.
  • Conyon, M.J., Murphy, K.J. (2000): “The prince and the pauper: CEO pay in the US and UK”, Economic Journal, Vol. 110, p. 640-671.
  • Conyon, M.J.; Core, J.E.; Wayne R. (2011): “Are US CEOs paid more than UK CEOs? Inferences from risk-adjusted pay”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 24, p. 402-438.
  • Conyon, M.J.; Fernandes, N.; Ferreira, M.A.; Matos, P.; Murphy, K.J. (2010): “The executive compensation controversy: a transatlantic analysis”, Working Paper, Fondazione Rodolfo De Benedetti.
  • Core, J. E.; Larcker, D. F. (2002): “Performance consequences of mandatory increases in executive stock ownership”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 64, p. 317-340.
  • Core, J.; Guay, W. (1999): “The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 28, p. 151-84.
  • Croci, E.; Gonenc, H.; Ozkan, N. (2012): “CEO compensation, family control, and institutional investors in Continental Europe”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 36, p. 3.318-3.335.
  • Equilar (2012): “S&P 500 CEO pay study”, Equilar, http://www.equilar.com.
  • Faleye, O.; Hoitash, R.; Hoitash, U. (2011): “The Costs of Intense Board Monitoring”. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 101, p. 160-181.
  • Frydman, C.; Jenter, D. (2010): “CEO compensation”, Nº w16585, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Gomez-Mejía, L.; Wiseman, R. (1997): “Reframing executive compensation: and assessment and outlook”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23, p. 291-374.
  • Gregg, P.; Jewell, S.; Tonks, I. (2012): “Executive Pay and Performance: Did Bankers’ Bonuses Cause the Crisis?”, International Review of Finance, Vol. 12, p. 89-122.
  • Hartzell J.; Starks L. (2003): “Institutional investors and executive compensation”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 58, p. 2.351-2.374.
  • Hermalin, B. E.; Weisbach, M. S. (1998): “Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO”, American Economic Review, p. 96-118.
  • Jensen, M. C.; Meckling, W. H. (1976): “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of financial economics, Vol. 3 (4), p. 305-360.
  • Jensen, M.; Murphy, K. (1999): “CEO incentives: it’s not how much you pay, but how”. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, p. 138-153.
  • Mehran, H. (1995): “Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance”, Journal Financial Economics, Vol. 38, Nº. 2, p. 163-184.
  • OECD (2011): “Board practices: incentives and governing risks, corporate governance”, OECD Publishing.
  • Ozkan, N. (2007): “Do corporate governance mechanisms influence CEO compensation? An empirical investigation of UK companies”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 17, p. 349-364.
  • Rediker, K.J.; Seth, A. (1995): “Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, Nº. 2, p. 85-99.
  • Sánchez-Marín, G.; Baixaull-Soler, J.S.; Lucas-Pérez, M.E. (2013): “Retribución de los altos directivos y gobierno corporativo en las empresas cotizadas españolas”, Universia Business Review, Vol. 37, p. 16-30.
  • Sapp, S. (2008): “The impact of corporate governance on executive compensation”, European Financial Management, Vol. 14, p. 710-746.
  • Yu, F. (2012): “How monitoring affects the structure of CEO equity-based compensation”, SSRN working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2147322.