Efecto de las metas de logro y las estructuras de metas de clase 3x2 en la motivación autodeterminadaun análisis multinivel en educación secundaria

  1. Antonio Méndez-Giménez 1
  2. José-A. Cecchini 1
  3. David Méndez-Alonso 1
  4. José Antonio Prieto 1
  5. Javier Fernández-Rio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 52-62

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

El estudio afronta dos objetivos: (a) examinar la validez de constructo del Cuestionario de Estructuras de Meta de Clase-3x2, y (b) analizar conjuntamente la influencia de las estructuras de metas de clase y las metas de logro 3x2 en la motivación autodeterminada del alumnado de secundaria. Participaron 2284 estudiantes (51,6% varones y 48,4% mujeres) de 12- 17 años (M = 14.31 años; DT = 1.15), distribuidos en 148 clases. Los resultados del análisis factorial confirmatorio apoyaron el modelo hipotético. La validez y consistencia interna del cuestionario fueron satisfactorias. Los resultados de los modelos lineales jerárquicos proporcionaron apoyo a los modelos directo, indirecto y de interacción. Respecto a efectos directos, la estructura de aproximación-yo, y las metas de aproximación-yo y aproximación-tarea fueron predictores positivos de la motivación autodeterminada, mientras que la estructura de aproximación-otro, y las metas de aproximación-otro y evitación-tarea fueron predictores negativos. En cuanto a efectos indirectos, los resultados revelaron que las tres metas de aproximación y la de evitación-tarea eran mediadores parciales de la relación entre la estructura de aproximación-yo y la motivación autodeterminada, mientras que las metas de aproximación-otro lo eran en la relación con su estructura correspondiente. Respecto a la interacción, la relación entre las metas de aproximación-tarea y la autodeterminación varió en función de la estructura de aproximación-otro

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
  • Anderman, E. M., Cupp, P. K., & Lane, D. (2009). Impulsivity and academic cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 135–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220970903224636
  • Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400.
  • Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 656-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.656
  • Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 879–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015945
  • Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.43.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Eccles, J., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. En R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation and education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.
  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
  • Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00393
  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  • Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
  • Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121-138.
  • Givens-Rolland, R. (2012). Synthesizing the evidence on classroom goal structures in Middle and Secondary Schools: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Review of Educational Research, 82(4), 396–435. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654312464909
  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3ª ed.). New York: Halstead Press.
  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
  • Gutman, L. M. (2006). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transitions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 44-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.01.004
  • Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. En K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hyde, J., & Durik, A. (2005). Gender, competence and self-regulation. En A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and self-regulation (pp. 375–391). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behavior. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-211.
  • Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. En C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21–53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 569-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569
  • Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
  • Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 15-29.
  • Lin, Y. H., & Cherng, B. L. (2006). The interaction effects between the cues of classroom goal and personal goal orientations on solving mathematics problems and self-regulated learning. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 37, 231-255.
  • Lin, Y. Y., & Cherng, B. L. (2007). The latent change analysis among individual goal orientations, classroom goal structures and self-regulated learning strategies. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 39, 173-194.
  • Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213.
  • Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Cecchini, J.A., & Fernández-Río, J. (in press). Validación del Cuestionario de Clima Motivacional 3x2 en Educación Física. Universitas Psychologica.
  • Méndez-Giménez, A., Cecchini, J.A., Fernández-Río, J., Méndez-Alonso, D., & Prieto-Saborit, J.A. (2017). Metas de logro 3x2, motivación autodeterminada y satisfacción con la vida en Educación Secundaria. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(2), 150-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2017.05.001
  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  • Miki, K., & Yamauchi, H. (2005). Perceptions of classroom goal structures, personal achievement goal orientations, and learning strategies. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 76, 260-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.76.260
  • Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement relevant-outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014221
  • Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Friedman, R. (2012). Achievement goals. En R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 191-207). New York, NY US: Oxford University Press.
  • Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1046
  • Newton, M., Duda, J., & Yin, Z. (2000). Examination of the psychometric properties of the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport Questionnaire-2 in a sample of female athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 275-290.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2003). Learning environment, achievement, and motivation in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 347-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10080
  • Papaioannou, A. G., Tsigilis, N., Kosmidouy E. & Milosis D. (2007). Measuring Perceived Motivational Climate in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 236-259.
  • Pardo, A., Ruiz M. A. & San Martín, R. (2007). Cómo ajustar e interpretar modelos multinivel con SPSS. Psicothema, 19(2), 308-321.
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
  • Peng, S. L., & Cherng, B. L. (2005). The relationship among a 4-dimensional classroom goal structure, personal goal orientation and academic help-seeking behavior. Journal of Taiwan Normal University Education, 50, 69-95.
  • Peng, S.-L. Cherng, B.-L., Chen, H.-C., & Lin Y.-Y. (2013). A model of contextual and personal motivations in creativity: How do the classroom goal structures influence creativity via self-determination motivations?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 50- 67.
  • Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2ª ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2011). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance classroom goals and the adoption of personal achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 680-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02012.x
  • Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88
  • Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251-264.
  • Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524-551.
  • Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001101
  • Wang, C.K.J., Biddle, S.J.H., & Elliot A.J. (2007). The 2 x 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147-168.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.
  • Yamauchi, H., & Miki, K. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between perceived learning environment, achievement goal orientations, and learning strategies: Intrinsic– extrinsic regulation as mediator. Psychologia, 46, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2003.1
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet