Academic Goals and Self-Handicapping Strategies in University Students

  1. María del Mar Ferradás 1
  2. Carlos Freire 1
  3. Antonio Valle 1
  4. José Carlos Núñez 2
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 19

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2016.25 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

In highly competitive settings like university, the fear of failure leads some students to protect their self-worth using self-handicapping strategies. The present investigation examines to what extent academic goals are related to those tactics in university students. Specifically, MANCOVA was applied to estimate statistical differences linked to behavioral and claimed self-handicapping strategies according to the level (high/medium/low) of four types of academic goal (achievement approach, achievement avoidance, mastery approach, and work avoidance). Degree, year in school, and gender were entered as covariates. 940 students (86.5% women) from University of A Coruña (M = 20.44; SD = 1.73) participated. Results show that: (a) both behavioral and claimed self-handicapping are promoted by ego-oriented goals (achievement avoidance, F(2, 937) = 23.56, p < .001, η p 2 = .048; achievement approach, F(2, 937) = 7.49, p < .001, η p 2 = .016); (b) work avoidance goals are related to behavioral self-handicapping (F(2, 937) = 9.09, p < .001, η p 2 = .019), but are not statistically linked to claimed self-handicapping; and (c) mastery approach goals are significantly, negatively related to both types of self-handicapping (F(2, 937) = 20.09, p < .001, η p 2 = .041). Psychological and educational implications of the findings are discussed.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akin U. (2014). 2x2 Achievement goal orientations and self-handicapping. Ceskoslovenska Psichologie, 58, 431–441.
  • Chen L. H., Wu C. H., Kee Y. H., Lin M. S., & Shui S. H. (2009). Fear of failure, 2×2 achievement goal and selfhandicapping: An examination of the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 298–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.006
  • Covington M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Covington M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.psych.51.1.171
  • De Castella K., Byrne D., & Covington M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 861–880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032464
  • Dweck C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  • Dweck C. S., & Leggett E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-295X.95.2.256
  • Eaton M. J., & Dembo M. H. (1997). Differences in the motivational beliefs of Asian American and non-Asian students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 433–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.433
  • Elliot A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
  • Elliot A. J., & Church M. A. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71, 369–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-6494.7103005
  • Elliot A. J., & McGregor H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
  • Ferradás M. M., Freire C., Rodríguez S., & Piñeiro I. (2015a, June). Estrategias de protección de la autovalía en estudiantes universitarios. Diferencias entre Ciencias de la Educación y Ciencias de la Salud [Self-worth protection strategies in university students. Differences between Educational Sciences and Health Sciences]. Paper presented at the 3rd International Congress of Educational Sciences and Development, San Sebastián, Spain.
  • Ferradás M., Freire C., Rodríguez S., & Piñeiro I. (2015b). Estrategias de self-handicapping en estudiantes universitarios. Diferencias entre cursos [Self-handicapping strategies in university students. Differences by year in school]. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, Extr(1), 63–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.17979/ reipe.2015.0.01.345
  • Finney S. J., & DiStefano C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling. A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Fisher S. (1984). Stress and perception of control. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Jones E. E., & Berglas S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200–206. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/014616727800400205
  • King R. B., & McInerney D. M. (2014). The work avoidance goal construct: Examining its structure, antecedents, and consequences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 42–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.12.002
  • Leary M. R., & Shepperd J. A. (1986). Behavioral selfhandicapping vs. self-reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1265–1268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514. 51.6.1265
  • Lovejoy C. M., & Durik A. M. (2010). Self-handicapping: The interplay between self-set and assigned achievement goals. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 242–252. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s11031-010-9179-4
  • Martin A. J. (1998). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Predictors and consequences from a self-worth motivation perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Sydney, New South Whales, Australia.
  • Martin A. J., Marsh H. W., & Debus R. L. (2001a). A quadripolar need achievement representation of self-handicapping and defensive pessimism. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 583–610. http://dx.doi. org/10.3102/00028312038003583
  • Martin A. J., Marsh H. W., & Debus R. L. (2001b). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 87–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.87
  • McCrea S. M., Hirt E. R., & Milner B. J. (2008). She works hard for the money: Valuing effort underlies gender differences in behavioral self-handicapping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 292–311. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.006
  • Midgley C., & Urdan T. (1995). Predictors of middle-school students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 389–411. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/0272431695015004001
  • Moller A. C., & Elliot A. J. (2006). The 2x2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In A. V. Mitel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307–326). New York, NY: Nova Science.
  • Ntoumanis N., Thogersen-Ntoumani C., & Smith A. L. (2009). Achievement goals, self-handicapping and performance: A 2x2 achievement goal perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1471–1482. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/02640410903150459
  • Rhodewalt F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-6494.1994.tb00795.x
  • Rhodewalt F., & Vohs K. D. (2005). Defensive strategies, motivation, and the self: A self-regulatory process view. In A. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 548–565). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Schwinger M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster J. (2011). Prevention of self-handicapping The protective function of mastery goals. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 699–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.004
  • Skaalvik E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71
  • Suárez Riveiro J. M., Cabanach R. G., & Valle Arias A. (2001). Multiple-goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561–572. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1348/000709901158677
  • Tannenbaum R. E. (2007). Goal orientation, work avoidance goals, and self-handicapping in community college students. (Published doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minnesota, MN. Retrieved from http://search.proquest. com/docview/304721503
  • Valle A., Núñez J. C., Cabanach R. G., Rodríguez S., González-Pienda J. A., & Rosário P. (2007). Metas académicas y estrategias motivacionales de autoprotección [Academic goals and self-protection motivational strategies]. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13, 617–632. Retrieved from http://www. investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/ ContadorArticulo.php?207
  • Valle A., Núñez J. C., Cabanach R. G., Rodríguez S., Rosário P., & Inglés C. J. (2015). Motivational profiles as a combination of academic goals in higher education. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 35, 634–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.819072
  • Zuckerman M., Kieffer S. C., & Knee C. R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects on coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1619–1628. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1619
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet