Applicability of dual-route reading models to Spanish

  1. Alfredo Ardila 1
  2. Fernando Cuetos 2
  1. 1 Florida International University
    info

    Florida International University

    Miami, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/02gz6gg07

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Aldizkaria:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Argitalpen urtea: 2016

Alea: 28

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 71-75

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Psicothema

Laburpena

Two opposing points of view have been presented with regard to the applicability of the dual-route reading models Spanish. Some authors maintain that, given the transparency of the reading system, non-lexical reading is the strategy followed predominantly by Spanish readers and for that reason these models are not appropriate to explain alexias (acquired dyslexias) in Spanish. Other authors, consider that since several cases of phonological, surface and deep alexia have been reported, dual-route reading models are applicable to Spanish in the same way that to the irregular writing systems. In order to contrast these two points of view, an analysis of the two main factors that influence the reading is made: characteristics of the Spanish orthography and characteristics of the Spanish readers. It is conclude that, (1) Due to its transparency, non-lexical reading represents –as in other transparent orthographies-- the initial reading strategy in Spanish; (2) the “reading threshold” (i.e., time required to become literate) is lower in Spanish because there are no irregular words to learn; (3) as reading experience increases, speed increases and lexical reading becomes used more; (4) Given the characteristics of the Spanish reading system, it is understandable that frequency of deep dyslexia is so low.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Alegría, J. (1985). Por un enfoque psicolingüístico del aprendizaje de la lectura y sus dificultades [For a psycholinguistic approach to reading learning and difficulties]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29(8), 79-94.
  • Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 545.
  • Álvarez, C. J., de Vega, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílabas [The syllable as the unit of lexical activation in the reading of trisyllabic words]. Psicothema, 10(2), 371-386.
  • Ardila, A. (1991). Errors resembling semantic paralexias in Spanish-speaking aphasics. Brain and Language, 41, 437-455.
  • Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., & Lecours, A.R. (1993). Decisión lexical en sujetos hispanoparlantes: efecto de la frecuencia y la longitud [Lexical decision in Spanish-speaking subject. Frequency and length effects]. Paper presented at the I11 Congreso Latinoamericano de Neuropsicología, Montevideo, Uruguay.
  • Ardila, A. (1998). Semantic paralexias in Spanish language. Aphasiology, 12, 885-900.
  • Ardila, A. (2001). Acquired language disorders. In M. O. Pontón & J. León-Carrión (Eds.), Neuropsychology and the Hispanic Patient: A Clinical Handbook (pp. 87-103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ardila, A. (2011). Trastornos adquiridos en el lenguaje oral y escrito en español [Acquiered disorders in Spanish oral and written language]. Revista de Investigación Lingüística, 14, 11-22.
  • Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., & Ostrosky-Solís, F. (1996). Agraphia in the Spanish language. Aphasiology, 10, 723-739.
  • Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., & Pinzón, O. (1989). Alexia and agraphia in Spanish speakers: CAT correlations and interlinguistic analysis. In A. Ardila & F. Ostrosky-Solís (Eds.), Brain Organization of Language and Cognitive Processes (pp. 147-175). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Basso, A., & Corno, M. (1994). Semantic errors in transcoding task in a shallow orthography: A retrospective study on 502 Italian vascular patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 149-156.
  • Berg, T. (1991). Phonological processing in a syllable-timed language with pre-final stress: Evidence from Spanish Speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 265-301.
  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla,E., et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6), 678-686.
  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398-1407.
  • Castejón, L., González-Pumariega, S., & Cuetos, F. (2011) Adquisición de la fluidez en la lectura de palabras en una muestra de niños españoles [Reading fluency adquisition in a sample of Spanish children: A longitudinal study]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 19-30.
  • Ciaghi, M., Pancheri, E., & Miceli, G. (2010) Semantic paralexias: A group-case study on the underlying functional mechanisms, incidence and clinical features in a consecutive series of 340 Italian aphasics. Brain and Language, 115, 121-132.
  • Coltheart, M. (1980). Deep dyslexia: A review of the syndrome. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Deep Dyslexia (pp. 326380). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Coltheart, M. (1981). Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language, 5(3), 245-286.
  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
  • Cuetos, F. (1993). Writing processes in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 17-28.
  • Cuetos, F. (19889). Los métodos de lectura desde el marco del procesamiento de la información [The reading methods from the processing of the information framework]. Bordón, 40(4) 659-670.
  • Cuetos, F. (2002). Sistemas de lectura en ortografías transparentes: evolución de la dislexia profunda en español [Reading systems in shallow orthographies: Evolution of deep dyslexia in Spanish]. Cognitiva, 14(2), 133-149.
  • Cuetos, F., & Barbón, A. (2006). Word naming in Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 415-436.
  • Cuetos, F., & Ellis, A. W. (1999). Visual paralexias in a Spanish-speaking patient with acquired dyslexia: A consequence of visual and semantic impairments? Cortex, 35, 661-674.
  • Cuetos, F., & Labos, E. (2001). The autonomy of the orthographic pathway in a shallow language: Data from an aphasic patient. Aphasiology, 15(4), 333-342.
  • Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2009). From grapheme to word in reading acquisition in Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(4), 583-601.
  • Cuetos, F., Valle-Arroyo, F., & Suárez, M.-P. (1996). A case of phonological dyslexia in Spanish. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(1), 1-24.
  • Dauer, R.M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11(1), 51-62.
  • Davies, R., & Cuetos, F. (2005). Acquired dyslexia in Spanish: A review and some observations on a new case of deep dyslexia. Behavioural Neurology, 16(2), 85-101.
  • Davies, R., & Cuetos, F. (manuscript no published). Variations in lexical and sublexical reading strategies observed in a transparent orthography: A report on five cases of acquired dyslexia in Spanish.
  • Davies, R., Barbon, A., & Cuetos, F. (2013). Lexical and semantic ageof-acquisition effects on word naming in Spanish. Memory and Cognition, 41(2), 297-311.
  • Díaz, A. R. (1995). Afasia motora aferente: estudio de un caso [Afferent motor aphasia: A case study]. Puebla, Mexico : Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
  • Ellis, A. (1984). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. London: LEA.
  • Ferreres, A. R., López, C. V., & China, N. N. (2003). Phonological alexia with vowel-consonant dissociation in non-word reading. Brain and Language, 84(3), 399-413.
  • Ferreres, A. R., & López, C. V. (2009). Las alexias fonológica, de superficie y profunda en hispanohablantes y los modelos de doble ruta [The phonological, surface and deep alexias in Spanish-speaking individuals and the double route models]. Ciencias Psicológicas, 3(2), 161-176.
  • Ferreres, A. R., López, C. V., & Fabrizio, S. (2012). Alexia de superficie en español sin déficit semántico [Surface dyslexia without a semantic deficit in Spanish]. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, 4(1), 86-103.
  • Ferreres, A. R., Martínez, M., & Olmedo, A. (2005). Acquired surface alexia in Spanish: A case report. Behavioural Neurology, 16(2), 7184.
  • Ferreres, A, R., & Miravelles, G. (1995). The production of semantic paralexias in Spanish-speaking aphasics. Brain and Language, 49, 156-172.
  • Guerra, R. (1983). Estudio estadístico de la sílaba en español [Statistical study of the syllable in Spanish]. In M. Esgueva & M. Cantarero (Eds.), Estudios de fonética I (pp. 9-112). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
  • Iribarren, I. C. (2007). Description and detection of acquired dyslexia and dysgraphia in Spanish. In J. G. Centeno, R. T. Anderson & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Communication disorders in Spanish speakers: Theoretical, research and clinical aspects (pp. 231-242). Clevedon, Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
  • Iribarren, I. C., Jarema, G., & Lecours, A. R. (1996). The assessment of surface dyslexia in a regular orthography, Spanish: A case study. Brain and Cognition, 32(2), 196-198.
  • Iribarren, I. C., Jarema, G., & Lecours, A. R. (1999). Lexical reading in Spanish: Two cases of phonological dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(3), 407-428.
  • Karanth, P. (2003). Cross-linguistic study of acquired reading disorders. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Landis, T., Regard, M., Graves, R., & Goodglass, H. (1983). Semantic paralexia: A release of right hemispheric function from left control. Neuropsychologia, 21, 359-364.
  • Lopera, F. (1987). El lenguaje: fundamentos de neurolingüística [Language: Fundamentals of neurolinguistics]. Medellin: Prensa Creativa.
  • Marshall, J. (1984). Toward a rational taxonomy of the developmental dyslexias. En R. Malatesha & H. Whitaker (Eds.), Dyslexia: A global issue (pp. 45-58). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Matute, E., & Leal, F. (2001). La transparencia de los sistemas ortográficos y la idea de estrategias diferenciales de procesamiento de la lengua escrita [Transparency of orthographic systems and the idea of different strateies in processing written language]. In G. López Cruz & M. del C. Morúa Leyva (Eds.), V Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Tomo III, Hermosillo, Son., México: Universidad de Sonora.
  • Morton, J. (1979). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. Marshall (Eds.), Psycholinguistics: Structures and processes (pp. 107-156). Cambridge: Paul Elek.
  • NationMater. Average years of schooling of adults (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.nationmaster.com/grap/edu_ave_yea_of_sch_of_adueducation-average-years-schooling-adults
  • Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134-144.
  • Ruiz, A., Ansaldo, A. I., & Lecours, A. R. (1994). Two cases of deep dyslexia in unilingual Hispanophone aphasics. Brain and Language, 46(2), 245-256.
  • Rubba, J. (2006). An overview of the English morphological system. English Department (Linguistics) California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo. Retrieved from: https://web.calpoly.edu/~jrubba/morph.over.html
  • Sanabria Díaz, G., Torres, M.del R., Iglesias, J., Mosquera, R., Reigosa, V., Santos, E., Lage, A., Estévez, N., & Galán, L. (2009). Changes in reading strategies in school-age children. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 441-453.
  • Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218.
  • Smith, R. (2012). Distinct word length frequencies: Distributions and symbol entropies. Glottometrics, 23, 7-22.
  • Serrano, F., Genard, N., Sucena, A., Defi or, S., Alegria, J., Mousty, P., et al. (2011). Variations in reading and spelling acquisition in Portuguese, French and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 10(1), 183-204.
  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 131-154). Hove: Erlbaum.
  • Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2013). The role of morphology in reading in Spanish-speaking children with dyslexia. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-7.
  • Traficante, D., & Burani, C. (2014). List context effect in languages with opaque and transparent orthographies: A challenge for models of reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
  • United Nations Development Programme Report 2005. Retrieved from: www.undp.org
  • Wilson, M. A., Cuetos, F., Davies, R., & Burani, C. (2013). Revisiting ageof-acquisition effects in Spanish visual word recognition: The role of item imageability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1842-1859.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet