Metacognition and executive functioning in Elementary School

Referencias bibliográficas

• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, Uni-versity of Vermont.
• Anderson, V. M., Jacobs, R., & Anderson, P. (2008). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasifica-ción de los diseños de investigación en psicología [A classifica-tion system of research designs in psychology]. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. doi: 10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
• Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (2013). International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Edu-cation, 28. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-3_11. New York: Springer.
• Barkley, R. A. (2012). Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale - Chil-dren and Adolescents (BDEFS-CA). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Bishop, T. L. (2011). Relationship between performance-based measures of executive function and the Behavior Rating Invento-ry of Executive Function (BRIEF), a parent rating measure. Disser-tation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 72(1-B), 522.
• Blöte, A. W., Van Otterloo, S. G., van Stevenson, C. E., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2004). Discovery and maintenance of the many-to-one counting strategy in 4-year-olds: A microgenetic study. British Jour-nal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 83–102
• Borys, S. V., Spitz, H. H., & Dorans, B. A. (1982). Tower of Hanoi per-formance of retarded young adults and nonretarded children as a function of solution length and goal state. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 87-110.
• Brock, L. L., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Nathanson, L. (2009). The con-tributions of ‘hot’ and ‘cool’ executive function to children’s aca-demic achievement and learning-related behaviors, and engage-ment in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(3), 337-349.
• Burin, D. I., Drake, M., & Harris, P. (2007). Evaluación de la atención. In D. I. Burin, M. Drake, & P. Harris (Eds.), Evaluación Neuropsicoló-gica en adultos [Neuropsychological assessment in adults](pp. 146-147). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
• Casal, J., & Mateu, E. (2003). Tipos de muestreo [Types of sampling]. Revista de Epidemiología y Medicina preventiva, 1, 3-7.
• Chevignard, M. P., Catroppa, C., Galvin, J., & Anderson, V. (2010). De-velopment and evaluation of an ecological task to assess execu-tive functioning post childhood TBI: The Children’s Cooking Task. Brain Impairment, 11(2), 125–143. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/brim.11.2.125
• Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291-314.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Corso, H. V, Sperb, T. M., Inchausti de Jou, G., & Fumagalli, J. (2013). Metacognition and executive functions: Relationships between concepts and implications for learning. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 29(1), 21-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722013000100004
• Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
• Díaz, A., Martín, R., Jiménez, J. E., García, E., Hernández, S., & Rodrí-guez, C. (2012). Torre de Hanoi: datos normativos y desarrollo evolutivo de la planificación [Hanoi Tower: normative data and evolutionary development of planning]. European Journal of Educa-tion and Psychology, 5(1), 79-91.
• Egeland, J., & Fallmyr, Ø. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF): Sup-port for a distinction between emotional and behavioral regula-tion. Child Neuropsychology, 16(4), 326-37. doi: 10.1080/09297041003601462
• Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G.R. Hancock & R.O. Muller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
• Flores-Lázaro, J. C., Castillo-Preciado, R. E., & Jiménez-Miramonte, N. A. (2014). Desarrollo de funciones ejecutivas, de la niñez a la ju-ventud [Development of executive functions, from childhood to youth]. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 463-473. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.155471
• García, T., Álvarez-García, D., Cueli, M., González-Castro, P. & Álva-rez (2013). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Funciona-miento Ejecutivo para Familias [Psychometric properties of the Executive Functioning Scale for Families]. Submitted for publication.
• García, T., Álvarez-García, D., González-Castro, P., Álvarez, L., & Se-gurola, L. A. (2014). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Funcionamiento Ejecutivo para Profesorado [Psychometric pro-perties of the Executive Functioning Scale for Teachers]. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 9(1), 49-69.
• García, T., González-Castro, P., Areces, D., Cueli, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). Executive functions in children and adolescents: The types of assessment measures used and implications for their validity in clinical and educational contexts. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35(3), 215-223.
• García, T., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., Álvarez, D., Cueli, M., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2013). Executive functioning in children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and reading disabilities. International Journal of Psychology & Psycholog-ical Therapy, 13(2), 179-194.
• Garner, J. K. (2009). Conceptualizing the relations between executive functions and self-regulated learning. Journal of Psychology, 143(4), 405-426. doi:10.3200/JRLP.143.4.405-426
• Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). BRIEF: Be-havior Rating Inventory of Executive Function professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Gioia, G. A., Kenworthy, L., & Isquith, P. K. (2010). Executive function in the real world: BRIEF lessons from Mark Ylvisaker. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(6), 433–439. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181fbc272
• González-Pienda, J. A., Fernández, E., Bernardo, A. B., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2014). Assessment of a self-regulated learning inter-vention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.12
• Korzeniowski, C. G. (2011). Desarrollo evolutivo del funcionamiento ejecutivo y su relación con el aprendizaje escolar [Evolutionary development of executive functioning and its relationship to school Learning]. Revista de Psicología, 7(13), 7-26.
• Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 24–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
• Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2010). The dual components of developing strategy use: Production and inhibition. In H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.). Metacognition strategy use and instruction (pp. 135–159). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collabo-rative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers and Education 54, 3-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.020
• Lee, E. (2011). An exploratory analysis of the ecological validity of a performance-based assessment of attention. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71(9-B), 5777.
• Lee, K., Lynn, N., & Fong, S. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387.
• Lezak, M. D., Howieson D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neu-ropsychological assessment - 5th edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Chapters.
• Lucangeli, D., & Cabrele, S. (2006). The relationship of metacognitive knowledge, skills and beliefs in children with and without math-ematical learning disabilities. In A. Desoete & M. V. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 103–133). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
• Lyons, K. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function: Elucidating the role of self-reflection in the development of self-regulation. In J. Benson (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 379-412). Burlington, VT: Academic Press.
• Marcovitch, S., & Zelazo, P. D. (2009). A hierarchical competing sys-tems model of the emergence and early development of execu-tive function. Developmental Science, 12(1), 1-18.
• Mares, D., McLuckie, A., Schwartz, M., & Saini, M. (2007). Executive function impairments in children with attention-deficit hyperac-tivity disorder: Do they differ between school and home envi-ronments? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(8), 527-534.
• Martín, R., Hernández, S., Rodríguez, C., García, E., Díaz, A., & Jimé-nez, J. E. (2012). Datos normativos para el Test de Stroop: patrón de desarrollo de la inhibición y formas alternativas para su eval-uación [Normative data for the Stroop Test: development pattern of inhibition and alternative forms of assessment]. European Jour-nal of Education and Psychology, 5(1), 39-51.
• McAuley, T., Chen, S., Goos, L., Schachar, R., & Crosbie, J. (2010). Is the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions more strongly associated with measures of impairment or executive function? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(3), 495-505. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000093
• Meltzer, L. (2013). Executive function and metacognition in students with learning disabilities: New approaches to assessment and in-tervention. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 1(2), 31-63.
• Montague, M., Enders, G., & Dietz, S. (2011). Effects of cognitive strat-egy instruction on math problem solving of middle school stu-dents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262-272. doi: 10.1177/0731948712463368
• Moos, D. C., & Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-regulated learning in the class-room: A literature review on the teacher’s role. Education Research International, 2012, Article ID 423284. doi:10.1155/2012/423284
• Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Revisión del modelo cíclico de Zimmerman sobre au-torregulación del aprendizaje [How do our students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman's cyclic model of self-regulated Learning]. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450-462. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
• Papageorgiou, V., Kalyva, E., Dafoulis, V., & Vostanis, P. (2008). Dif-ferences in parents' and teachers' ratings of ADHD symptoms and other mental health problems. The European Journal of Psychia-try, 22(4), 200-210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0213-61632008000400003
• Pennequin, V., Sorel, O., & Mainguy, M. (2010). Metacognition, execu-tive functions and aging: The effect of training in the use of met-acognitive skills to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Adult Development, 17(3), 168-176. doi: 10.1007/s10804-010-9098-3
• Pennequin, V., Sorel, O., Nanty, I., & Fontaine, R. (2010). Metacogni-tion and low achievement in mathematics: The effect of training in the use of metacognitive skills to solve mathematical word problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(3), 198-220.
• Piolat, A., Kellogg, R. T., & Farioli, F. (2001). The triple task technique for studying writing processes: On which task is attention fo-cused? Current Psychology Letters: Brain, Behavior and Cognition, 4, 67–83.
• Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291-312. doi: 10.1002/acp.1086
• Rettew, D. C., van Oort, F. V. A., Verhulst, F. C., Buitelaar, J. C., Ormel, J., Hartman, C. A., …Hudziak, J. H. (2011). When parent and teacher ratings don’t agree: The Tracking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharma-cology, 21(5), 389–397. doi: 10.1089/cap.2010.0153
• Roebers, C. M., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012). Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: An explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achieve-ment. Metacognition & Learning, 7, 151-173. doi: 10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9
• Rosário, P., González-Pienda, J. A., Pinto, R., Ferreira, P., Lourenço, A., & Paiva, O. (2010). Efficacy of the program “Testas’s (mis)adventures” to promote the deep approach to lear-ning. Psicothema, 22, 828-834.
• Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., & Solano, P. (2006). School-family: Is a reciprocal and positive relationship possible? Papeles del Psicólogo, 27(3), 174-182.
• Salbach-Andrae, H., Lenz, K., & Lehmkuhl, U. (2009). Patterns of agreement among parent, teacher and youth ratings in a referred sample. European Psychiatry, 24(5), 345–351. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.07.008
• Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition and memory development in childhood and adolescence. In H. S.Waters & W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use and instruction (pp. 54–81). New York: Guildford Press.
• Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2008). Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks dur-ing homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 207-230. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-622.
• Thorell, L. B., & Nyberg, L. (2008). The Childhood Executive Func-tioning Inventory (CHEXI): A new rating instrument for parents and teachers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 536–552. doi: 10.1080/87565640802101516
• Throndsen, I. (2011). Self-regulated learning of basic arithmetic skills: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 558–578.
• Toll, S. W. M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 521–532. doi: 10.1177/0022219410387302
• Valle, A., Rodríguez, S., Cabanach, R. G., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., & Rosário, P. (2009). Diferencias en rendimiento académico según los niveles de las estrategias cognitivas y de las estrategias de autorregulación [Differences in academic perfor-mance according to the levels of cognitive strategies and self-regulation strategies]. SUMMA Psicológica UST, 6(2), 31–42.
• Van der Ven, S. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. (2013). The structure of executive functions in children: A closer examination of inhibition, shifting, and updating. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 70-87. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02079.x
• Van De Voorde, S., Roeyers, H., Verté, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2010). Working memory, response inhibition, and within-subject varia-bility in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or reading disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 366-79. doi: 10.1080/13803390903066865
• Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197-218). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Weil, L. G., Flemingc, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilforda, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., … Blakemorea. S. (2013). The development of metacog-nitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 264–271. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004
• Williams, J. R. (2008). Revising the Declaration of Helsinki. World Med-ical Journal, 54, 120- 125.
• Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical, background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.