Factors involved in making post-performance judgments in mathematics problem-solving

  1. Trinidad García Fernández 1
  2. Evelyn Kroesbergen 2
  3. Celestino Rodríguez Pérez 1
  4. Paloma González Castro 1
  5. Julio González Pienda 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Utrech University
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 27

Número: 4

Páginas: 374-380

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: este estudio analiza la influencia del funcionamiento ejecutivo, componentes afectivo-motivacionales relacionados con las matemáticas, rendimiento académico y características de la tarea, en las habilidades de calibración de estudiantes de quinto y sexto curso tras la realización de dos problemas matemáticos. Método: participaron 188 estudiantes, divididos en dos grupos según la precisión de sus juicios de rendimiento tras la tarea (precisos = 79; imprecisos = 109). Se analizaron las diferencias entre los grupos en estas variables, y su capacidad discriminativa prediciendo la pertenencia al grupo. Los efectos de la edad, género y nivel educativo fueron analizados. Resultados: los resultados indicaron que los estudiantes precisos en sus juicios presentaron mejores niveles de funcionamiento ejecutivo, así como sentimientos, creencias y motivaciones más positivas hacia las matemáticas, y mejor rendimiento académico en la asignatura. También emplearon más tiempo realizando las tareas. El rendimiento académico, la utilidad percibida de las matemáticas, y el tiempo empleado en la primera tarea predijeron significativamente la pertenencia de los estudiantes al grupo, clasificando correctamente al 71.3%. Conclusiones: estos resultados apoyan la relación entre rendimiento académico y calibración, sugiriendo la necesidad de considerar un amplio rango de variables cuando estos juicios quieren ser explicados.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adelson, J. L., & McCoach, D. B. (2011). Development and psychometric properties of the Math and Me Survey: Measuring third through sixth graders’ attitudes towards mathematics. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44, 225-247.
  • Boekaerts, M., & Rozendaal, J. S. (2010). Using multiple calibration measures in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students’ accuracy of feeling of confidence. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 372-382.
  • Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C., & Nunnery, J. A. (2011). The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 280-287.
  • Boonen, A. J. H., van der Schoot, M., van Wesel, F., de Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 271-279.
  • Bouffard, T., & Narciss, S. (2011). Benefits and risks of positive bias in self-evaluation of academic competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 205-256.
  • Bull, E., & Lee, K. (2014). Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(1), 36-41.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Dupeyrat, C., Escribe, C., Huet, N., & Régner, I. (2011). Positive biases in self-assessment of mathematics competence, achievement goals, and mathematics performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 241-250.
  • Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Over-confidence in children’s multi-trial judgments of learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1-9.
  • García, T., Álvarez-García, D., Cueli, M., González-Castro, P., & Álvarez, L. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Executive Functions Scale for Families (EFS-F). Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • García, T., González-Pienda, J. A., Rodríguez, C., Álvarez-García, D., & Álvarez, L. (2014). Psychometric characteristics of the BRIEF scale for the assessment of executive functions in Spanish clinical population. Psicothema, 26(1), 47-54.
  • García, T., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., Álvarez-García, D., & González-Pienda, J.A. (In Press). Metacognition and Executive Functioning in Primary School. Anales de Psicología.
  • García, T., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., González-Pienda, J.A., & Torrance, M. (2015). Elementary students’ metacognitive processes and post-performance calibration on mathematical problem-solving tasks. Metacognition and Learning, 10(2).
  • Garner, J. K. (2009). Conceptualizing the relations between executive functions and self-regulated learning. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 143, 405-426.
  • González-Pienda, J. A., Cueli, M., García, T., Suárez, N., Fernández, E., Tuero-Herrero, E., et al. (2012). Gender differences in attitudes towards Mathematics in compulsory school. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 3(1), 55-73.
  • Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M.C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky, & R. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of Memory and Metacognition (pp. 429-455). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Howie, P., & Roebers, C. (2007) Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall: New insights provided by a calibration perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 871-893
  • Jacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem-solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 133-149.
  • Kolkman, M. E., Hoijtink, H. H., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2013). The role of executive functions in numerical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 145-151.
  • Montague, M., Enders, G., & Dietz, S. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262-272.
  • Narciss, S., Koerndle, H., & Dresel, M. (2011). Self-evaluation accuracy and satisfaction with performance: Are there affective costs or benefits of positive self-evaluation bias? International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 230-240.
  • Özsoy, G. (2012). Investigation of fifth grade students’ mathematical calibration skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(2), 1190-1194.
  • Presentación, M. J., Siegenthaler, R., Pinto, V., Mercader, J., & Miranda, A. (2015). Math skills and executive functioning in preschool: clinical and ecological evaluation. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 65-82.
  • Rinne, L. F., & Mazzocco, M. M. (2014). Knowing right from wrong in mental arithmetic judgments: Calibration of confidence predicts the development of accuracy. PLoSONE 9(7), e98663.
  • Roebers, C. M., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberger, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012). Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: an explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 151-173.
  • Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2014). Calibration of selfevaluations of mathematical ability for students in England aged 13 and 15, and their intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics after age 16. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 49-61.
  • Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 3-31.
  • Thorell, L. B., Veleiro, A., Siu, A. F., & Mohammadi, H. (2013). Examining the relation between ratings of executive functioning and academic achievement: findings from a cross-cultural study. Child Neuropsychology, 19(6), 630-638.
  • Welsh, M. C., & Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 199-230.
  • Van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B. H., van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primaryschool students’ metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning & Instruction, 24, 15-25.
  • Whimbey, A., & Lochhead, J. (1999). Problem-solving and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Williams, J. R. (2008). Revising the Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Journal, 54, 120-125.
  • Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and Cool Executive Function in Childhood and Adolescence: Development and Plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354-360.