Screening enterprising personality in youthan empirical model

  1. Suárez Álvarez, Javier 1
  2. Pedrosa, Ignacio 1
  3. García Cueto, Eduardo 1
  4. Muñiz Fernández, José 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 17

Páginas: 1-9

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2014.61 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Entrepreneurial attitudes of individuals are determined by different variables, some of them related to the cognitive and personality characteristics of the person, and others focused on contextual aspects. The aim of this study is to review the essential dimensions of enterprising personality and develop a test that will permit their thorough assessment. Nine dimensions were identified: achievement motivation, risk taking, innovativeness, autonomy, internal locus of control, external locus of control, stress tolerance, self-efficacy and optimism. For the assessment of these dimensions, 161 items were developed which were applied to a sample of 416 students, 54% male and 46% female (M = 17.89 years old, SD = 3.26). After conducting several qualitative and quantitative analyses, the final test was composed of 127 items with acceptable psychometric properties. Alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from .81 to .98. The validity evidence relative to the content was provided by experts (V = .71, 95% CI = .56 - .85). Construct validity was assessed using different factorial analyses, obtaining a dimensional structure in accordance with the proposed model of nine interdependent dimensions as well as a global factor that groups these nine dimensions (explained variance = 49.07%; ?2/df = 1.78; GFI= .97; SRMR = .07). Nine out of the 127 items showed Differential Item Functioning as a function of gender (p < .01, R 2 >.035). The results obtained are discussed and future lines of research analyzed.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aiken L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measure ment, 40, 955-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  • Almeida P. I. L., Ahmetoglu G., & Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2014). Who wants to be and entrepreneur? The relationship between vocational interests and individual differences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Career Assessment. 22, 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072713492923
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Baum J. R., Frese M., Baron R. A., & Katz J. A. (2007). Entrepreneurship as an area of psychology study: An introduction. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. J. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bonnett C., & Furnham A. (1991). Who wants to be an entrepreneur? A study of adolescents interested in a young enterprise scheme. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 465-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(91) 90027-Q
  • Brandstä tter H. (2011). Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-Analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 222-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.007
  • Burges Sbicigo J., & Dalb osco Delĺ Aglio D. (2013). Contextual variables associated with psychological adjustment of adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.20
  • Byrne B. M. (2001). St ructural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Carraher S. M.,Buchanan J. K.,Puia G. 2010 Entrepreneurial need for achievement in China, Latvia, and the USA Baltic Journal o f Management 5 378-396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465261011079767
  • Chandler G. N., DeTienne D. R., McKelvie A., & Mumford T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 375-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
  • Chell E. (2008). The entrepreneurial personality: A social construction. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cheng C., Cheung S. F., Chio J. H., & Chan M. P. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-Analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 39, 152-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028596
  • Costa H., Ripoll P., Sánchez M., & Carvalho C. (2013). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy: Effects on psychological well-being in college students. The Spanis h Journal of Psychology, 16, E50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.39
  • Covin J. G., & Wales W. J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 677-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00432.x
  • Downing S. M. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3-2 5). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fonseca-Pedrero E., Lemos-Giráldez S., Paino M., Villazón-García U., & Muñiz J. (2009). Validation of the schizotypal personality questionnaire brief form in ado lescents. Schizophrenia Research, 111, 53-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.006
  • Gartner W. B. (1989). "Who is an entrepreneur? " is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 12, 47-68.
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2012). The words̈largest study of entrepreneurship. London, UK: London Business School. Retrieved from www.gemconsortium.org
  • Gomez-Benito J., Hidalgo M. D., & Zumbo B. D. (2013). Effectiveness of combining statistical tests and effect sizes when using logistic discriminant function regression to detect differential item functioning for polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measu rement, 73(5), 875-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164413492419
  • Hidalgo M. D., Gómez J., & Padilla J. L. (2005). Logistic regression: Analytic strategies in differential item functioning detection. Psicothema, 17, 509-515.
  • Hisrich R., Langan-Fox J., & Grant S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: A call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62, 575-589. ht tp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.575
  • Jang K. L., Livesley W. J., Ando J., Yamagata S., Suzuki A., Angleitner A., ⋯ Spinath F. (2006). Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five , 41, 261-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.033
  • Koellinger P. (2008). Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9107-0
  • Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S. (1986). Estrés y procesos cognitivos [Stress and cognitive processes]. Barcelona, Spain: Martínez Roca.
  • López J., & García J. (2011). Dispositional optimism, pessimism and realism in technological potential entrepreneurs. Psicothema, 23, 611-616.
  • Lozano L. M., García-Cueto E., & Muñiz J. (2008). Effect of the number of re sponse categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4, 73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
  • Moore S., & Gullone E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 343-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01537389
  • Moreno R., Martínez R., & Muñiz J. (2006). New guidelines for developing multiple-choice items. Methodology, 2, 65-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.65
  • Muñiz J., Fidalgo A. M., García-Cueto E., Martínez R., & Moreno R. (2005). Análisis de los items [Item analysis]. Madrid, Spain: La Muralla.
  • Obschonka M., Schmitt-Rodermund E., Silbereisen R. K., Gosling S. D., & Potter J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone perso nality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 104-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032275
  • Penfield R. D.,Giacobbi P. R. 2004 Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken's item content-relevance index Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 8 213-225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee0804-3
  • Peterman N. E., & Kennedy J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students' perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003 .00035.x
  • Rauch A., & Frese M. (2007 a ). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-Analysis on the relationship between business owners' personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16, 353-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320701595438
  • Rauch A., & Frese M. (2007 b ). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entr epreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. J. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rius F., Barón F. J., Sánchez E., & Parras L. (1997). Bioestadística: Métodos y aplicaciones [Biostatistics: Methods and applications]. Málaga, Spain: Universidad de Málaga.
  • Sánchez J. C. (2011). Entrepreneurship as a legitimate field of knowledge. Psicothema, 23, 427-432.
  • Sánchez J. L., Serradilla F., Martínez E., & Bobadilla J. (2008). Choice of metrics used is collaborative filtering and their impact on recommender systems. (pp. 432-436) Madrid, Spain: Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2008.4635147
  • Schmitt-Rodermund E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, early entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 498-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.007
  • Shane S., & Venkataraman S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791611
  • Shepperd J. A. , Carroll P., Grace J., & Terry M. (2002). Exploring the causes of comparative optimism. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 65-98.
  • Souitaris V., Zerbinati S., & Al-Laham A. (2007). Do en trepreneurship programmes raiseentrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05 .002
  • Suárez-Á lvarez J., Campillo-Álvarez A., Fonseca-Pedrero E., García-Cueto E., & Muñiz J. (2013). Professional training in the workplace: The role of achievement motivation and locus of control. The Spanish J ournal of Psychology, 16, E35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.19
  • Tyszka T., Cieslik J., Domurat A., & Macko A. (2011). Motivation, self-efficacy, and risk attitudes among entrepreneurs during transi tion to a market economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 124-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.011
  • Van Gelderen M., & Jansen P. (2006). Autonomy as a start-up motive. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13, 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000610645289
  • Wincent J., & Örtqvist D. (2009a ). Role stress and entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-006-0017-9
  • Wincent J., & Ö rtqvist D. (2009b ). A comprehensive model of entrepreneur role stress antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 225-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9102-8
  • Yordanova D. I., & Alexandrona-Boshnakova M. I. (2011). Gender effects on risk-taking entrepreneurs: Evidence from Bulgaria. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 17, 272-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1355255111 1130718
  • Zhao H., Seibert S. E. & Lumpkin G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-Analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 381-404.
  • Zumbo B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, Canada: Directorate of Human Re sources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet