The Spanish Adaptation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale (ISOS)

  1. Lozano Fernández, Luis Manuel 1
  2. Valor Segura, Inmaculada
  3. Sáez Díaz, Gemma
  4. Expósito, Francisca
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 27

Número: 2

Páginas: 134-140

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: la cosificación sexual de la mujer es una manifestación sutil de violencia de género. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar la adaptación al español de la escala Interpersonal Sexual Objectification (ISOS) de 15 ítems para contar con un instrumento adecuado a la hora de evaluar dicho constructo. Método: tras adaptar el cuestionario se aplicó a 771 mujeres de población general. Posteriormente se evaluó las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario desde la perspectiva clásica y de Teoría de la Respuesta a los Ítems. Resultados: los datos obtenidos fueron muy similares a los de la versión original. La ISOS mostró muy buena consistencia interna y una estructura bifactorial: evaluación corporal y aproximaciones explícitas no deseadas. Además, la ISOS mostró correlaciones con sexismo benévolo, ansiedad-estado y autoestima. Conclusiones: la versión española de la ISOS se muestra como una medida fiable y válida de cosificación sexual de la mujer en el contexto interpersonal.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AERA, APA, NCME (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: AERA.
  • Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
  • Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633-642.
  • Bartky, S.L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Calogero, R.M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 16-21.
  • Calogero, R.M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J.K. (2010). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and directions for research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American PsychologicalAssociation.
  • Calogero, R.M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24(3), 312-318.
  • Calogero, R.M., & Jost, J.T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 211-228.
  • Choma, B.L., Visser, B.A., Pozzebon, J.A., Bogaert, A.F., Busseri, M.A., & Sadava, S.W. (2010). Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 63, 645-656.
  • Davidson, M.M, Gervais, S.J., Canivez, G.L., & Cole, B.P. (2013). A psychometric examination of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale among college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 239- 250.
  • Elosúa, P., & Zumbo, B. (2008). [Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada]. Reliability coefficients for ordered categorical response scales. Psicothema, 20(4), 896-901.
  • Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). [Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos]. Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159-170.
  • Expósito, F., Herrera, A., Valor-Segura, I., Herrera, M.C., & Lozano, L.M. (2014). Spanish adaptation of the Illinois Sexual Harassment Myth Acceptance (ISHMA). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E40, 1-13.
  • Fredrickson, B.L., & Roberts, T.A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
  • García-Cueto, E., & Fidalgo, A.M. (2005). [Análisis de los ítems]. Item analysis. In Muñiz, A.M. Fidalgo, E. García-Cueto, R. Martínez y R. Moreno (Eds.) [Análisis de los ítems]. Item analysis (pp. 53-130). Madrid: La Muralla.
  • Guillén-Riquelme, A., & Buela-Casal, A. (2011). [Actualización psicométrica y funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en el State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)]. Psychometric Update and differential item functioning in the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Psicothema, 23, 510-515.
  • Hambleton, R.K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R.K. Hambleton, P.F. Merenda & S.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Heflick, N.A., Goldenberg, J.L., Cooper, D.P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572-581.
  • Joreskog, K.G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294-316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  • Klonoff, E.A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439-472.
  • Kozee, H.B., Tylka, T.L., Augustus-Horvath, C.L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectifi cation Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176-189.
  • Liang, T., Han, K.T., & Hambleton, R.K. (2009). ResidPlots-2: Computer software for IRT graphical residual analyses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(5), 411-412.
  • Lozano, L.M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology, 4(2), 73-79.
  • Martín-Albo, J., Núñez, J., Navarro, J., & Grijalbo, F. (2007). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and validation in university students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 458-467.
  • Múñiz, J., Elosúa, P., & Hambleton, R.K. (2013). [Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición]. Guidelines for the translation and adaptation of tests: Second edition. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157.
  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide. 6th edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Neall, A.M., & Tuckey, M.R. (2014). A methodological review of research on the antecedents and consequences of workplace harassment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 225-257.
  • Newheiser, A-K., LaFrance, M., & Dovidio, J.F. (2010). Others as objects: How women and men perceive the consequences of selfobjectification. Sex Roles, 63, 657-671.
  • Noll, S.M., & Fredrickson, B.L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623-636.
  • Pina, A., Gannon, T.A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126-138.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Rudman, L.A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 36(8), 734-746.
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.
  • Sireci, S., & Faulker-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26, 100-107.
  • Spaan, M. (2006). Test and item specifications development. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 71-79.
  • Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (2002). STAI [Manual del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado-Rasgo.] State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual [6th ed.]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Szymanski, D.M., Moffitt, L.B., & Carr, E.R. (2011). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6-38.
  • Swami, V., Coles, R., Wilson, E., Salem, N., Wyrozumska, K., & Furnham, A. (2010). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectifi cation of others, and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 365-379.
  • Swim, J.K., Cohen, L.L., & Hyers, L.L (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J.K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejuice: The target’s perspective (pp. 37-60). New York: Academic Press.
  • Swim, J.K., Hyers, L.L., Cohen, L.L., & Ferguson, M.J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31-53.
  • Whealin, J.M. (2002). Women’s report of unwanted sexual attention during childhood. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11(1), 75-93.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet