Elementos para un concepto sociológico de innovación

  1. Köhler, Holm-Detlev 1
  2. González Begega, Sergio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1139-5737

Año de publicación: 2014

Número: 29

Páginas: 67-88

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/EMPIRIA.29.2014.12942 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Empiria: Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALONSO, L.E. y FERNÁNDEZ RODRÍGUEZ, C.J. (eds.) (2012): La financiarización de las relaciones salariales, Madrid, La Catarata.
  • BENDER, G. (2003): "Innovation in Low-Tec Companies - Towards a Conceptualisation of Non-Science-Based Innovation", en H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobsen, D. y St. Laestadius (eds.), Low Low-tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy, Frankfurt. a.M. et al., Peter Lang, pp. 85-98.
  • BENDER, G. (2006): Peculiarities and Relevance on Non-Research-Intensive Industries in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Final Report of the PILOT project (Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech), University of Dortmund, disponible en http://www.pilotproject.org [consulta 10-5-2013].
  • BLACKER, F. (1995): "Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation", Organization Studies, vol. 16 (6), pp. 1021-1046.
  • BÖHLE, F. (2010): "Arbeit als Handeln", en F. Böhle, F., G. Voß y G. Wachtler (eds.): Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, pp. 151-176.
  • BOYER, R. y FREYSSENET, M. (2003): Los modelos productivos, Madrid, Fundamentos.
  • BRAND, St. (1995): "We Owe It All to Hippies". Time Magazine. (Special Issue: Welcome to Cyberspace).
  • BUSH, V. (1945): Science The Endless Frontier, A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
  • CASTRO MARTÍNEZ, E. y FERNÁNDEZ DE LUCIO, I. (2013): El significado de innovar, Madrid, La Catarata.
  • CHILD, J. (2005): Organization. Contemporary Principles and Practice, Malden et al., Blackwell.
  • CHILD, J. (ed.) (2012): The evolution of organizations, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • CHILD, J. y HEAVENS, S.J. (2001): "The Social Constitution of Organizations and its Implications for Organizational Learning", en M. Dierkes, M. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308-326.
  • COASE, R.H. (1937): "The nature of the firm", ECONOMICA, 16, pp. 386-405.
  • COHEN, W.M. y LEVINTHAL, D.A. (1990): "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2010): This is European Social Innovation, Bruselas, Comisión Europea.
  • COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2013): Unión por la Innovación. Bruselas, Comisión Europea.
  • COOKE, P., HEIDENREICH, M. y BRACZYK, H.-J. (eds.) (2004): Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governance in a globalized world, London/N.Y ., Routledge, 2ndedition.
  • COOKE, P. y MORGAN, K. (1998): The Associational Economy, Oxford/N.Y., Oxford University Press.
  • COOPER, R.G. (2005): Product Leadership, USA: Basic Books.
  • DENIS, H. (2012): "Marx, Walras y Schumpeter", Revue Interventions économiques, 46/2012.
  • DEUTSCHMANN, C. (2002): Postindustrielle Industriesoziologie, Weinheim y München: Juventa.
  • DIERKES, M. (1996): "Sobre paradigmas, aprendizaje y desarrollo empresarial", Situación, 3, pp. 39-55.
  • DIERKES, M., HOFFMANN, U. y MARZ, L. (eds) (1992): Leitbild und Technik. Zur Entstehung und Steuerung technischer Innovationen, Berlin: Sigma.
  • DIMAGGIO, P.J. y POWELL, W.W. (1983): "The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48 (2), pp. 147-160.
  • DOSI, G., TEECE, D.J. y WINTER, S. (1992): "Toward a theory of corporate coherence: Preliminary remarks", en G. Dosi, R. Gianetti y P.A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 185-211.
  • ECHEVARÍA, J. y GURUTXAGA, A. (2012): La luz de la luciérnaga. Diálogos de Innovación Social, Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
  • ELLIOT, J.E. (1980): "Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism's Creative Destruction: A Comparative Restatement", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, August 1980, pp. 45-68.
  • EVELEENS, C. (2010): "Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications", disponible en http://www.lectoraatinnovatie.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Innovation-management-literature-review-.pdf [consulta 10-5-2014].
  • FOSTER, J.B. (2007): "The Financialization of Capitalism", Monthly Review, 58 (11), pp. 1-12.
  • FREEMAN, C. (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London, Pinter.
  • FREEMAN, C. (2002): "Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems - complementarity and economic growth", Research Policy, 31, pp. 191-211.
  • GURRUTXAGA, A. (2010): Recorridos por el cambio, la innovación y la incertidumbre, Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
  • HALL, P.A. y SOSKICE, D. (2001): "An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage", en P.A. Hall y D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-68.
  • HAYEK, F.A. (1945): "The use of knowledge in society", The American Economic Review, 35 (4), pp. 519-530.
  • HEIDENREICH, M. (2004): "Conclusion. The dilemmas of regional innovation systems", en P.N. Cooke, M. Heindenreich y H.J. Braczyk (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, London: Routledge, pp.363-389.
  • HENDERSON, R.M. y CLARK, K.B. (1990): "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 9-30.
  • HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. (2002): "Knowledge in Societal Development: The Case of Low-Tech Industries", Universität Dortmund, Arbeitspapiere des Lehrstuhls Technik und Gesellschaft.
  • INNERARITY, D. (2009): "La sociedad de la innovación", en Innobasque (comp.), ¿Cómo es una sociedad innovadora?, Zamudio, Innobasque, pp. 18-41, disponible en http://www.innobasque.com/home.aspx?tabid=762 [consulta 13-5-2013].
  • JÜRGENS, U. y SABLOWSKI, T. (2005): "Die Vielfalt sektoraler Innovationsprozesse - Pharmaindustrie, Telekommunikation, Autoindustrie", WSI-Mitteilungen, 58 (3), pp. 121-129.
  • KÄDTLER, J. (2010): "Finanzmärkte und Finanzialisierung", en F. Böhle, F., G. Voß y G. Wachtler (eds.), Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 619-639.
  • KÖHLER, H.-D. (2007): "Warum arbeiten wir immer noch am Fliessband? Zum QWERTY-Effekt in Produktionssystemen", Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 61 (1), pp. 59-66.
  • KÖHLER, H.-D. (2008): "Profit and innovation strategies in low-tech firms", Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 26 (3), pp. 73-87.
  • LAESTADIUS, St. (2003): "The classification and taxonomy of industries - Measuring the right thing", en H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobsen, D. y St. Laestadius (eds.), Low-tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy, Frankfurt. A.M. et al.: Peter Lang, pp. 63-84.
  • LAM, A. (2000): "Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework", Organization Studies, 21 (3), pp. 487-513.
  • LAM, A. (2003): "Skills and careers of R&D Knowledge Workers in the Netw
  • LAM, A. (2003): " Skills and careers of R&D Knowledge Workers in the Network Economy", Paper presented at the IIRA 13th World Congress, Berlin.
  • LARREA, J.L. (2010): "Paradojas en la Innovación", San Sebastián: Orkestra Working Paper No 2010-DO1.
  • LOASBY, B.J. (2002): "The evolution of knowledge: beyond the biological model", Research Policy, 31, pp. 1227-1239.
  • LUNDVALL, B.A˚. (2002): Innovation, growth and social cohesion. The Danish model, UK/Northampton, USA, Cheltenham.
  • LUNDVALL, B.A˚., JOHNSON, B., ANDERSONEN, E.S. y DALUM, B. (2002): "National systems of production, innovation and competence building", Research Policy, 31, pp. 213-231.
  • LÜTZ, S. (2006): "Zwischen Pfadabhängigkeit und Wandel. 'Governance' und die Analyse kapitalistischer Institutionenentwicklung", en U. Brinkmann, K. Krenn y S. Schief (eds.), Endspiel des kooperativen Kapitalismus?, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 16-34.
  • MACKENZIE, D. (1984): "Marx and the Machine", Technology and Culture, 25 (3), pp. 473-502.
  • MALERBA, F. (ed.) (2004): Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge Mass., Cambridge University Press.
  • MARX, K. (1946, 1867): El Capital, México: FCE.
  • MCKINLAY, A. (2005): "Knowledge Management", en St. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson y P.S. Tolbert (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization, Oxford/N.Y., Oxford University Press, pp. 242-262.
  • MEYER, J.W. y ROWAN, B. (1977): "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), pp. 340-363.
  • MEYER, U. y SCHUBERT, C. (2007): "Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution. The role of agency and institutions in the stabilization of technological innovations", Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 3, pp. 23-44.
  • MONTGOMERY, C.A. (ed.) (1995): Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis, Boston et al., Kluwer.
  • MOULAERT, F., MACCALLUM, D., MEHMOOD, A. y HAMDOUCH, A. (eds.) (2010): Social Innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, Bruselas: Unión Europea, disponible en http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/124376771EN6.pdf [consulta 13-5-2013].
  • MÜNCH, R. y GUENTHER, T. (2005): "Der Markt in der Organisation. Von der Hegemonie der Fachspezialisten zur Hegemonie des Finanzmanagements", en P. Windolf (ed.) (2005): Finanzmarkt-Kapitalismus, Sonderheft 45 der KZfSS, pp. 394-417.
  • MYTELKA, L.K. y SMITH, K. (2002): "Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process", Research Policy, 31: 1467-1479.
  • NELSON, R., (ed.) 1993: National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • NELSON, R. y WINTER, S. (1977: "In search of useful theory of innovation", Research Policy, 6, pp. 36-76.
  • NONAKA, I. (1994): "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization Science, 5 (1), pp. 14-37.
  • ORTMANN, G. (1995): Formen der Produktion, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • PAVITT, K. (1984): "Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research Policy, 13 (6), pp. 343-373.
  • PAVITT, K. (1992): "Some foundations for a theory of the large innovating firm", en G. Dosi, R. Gianetti, P.A. Toninelli (eds.), Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 212-228.
  • PENROSE, E. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • PETTIGREW, A.M. (2003): Innovative forms of organizing, London/Thousand Oaks/ New Delhi, Sage.
  • POLANYI, M. (1966): The tacit dimension, N.Y., Garden City.
  • PORTER, M. (1990): The competitive advantages of Nations, London, MacMillan.
  • PORTER, M. (1998): "Clusters and the new economies of competition", Harvard Business Review, 76 (6), 77-90.
  • ROGERS, E.M. (1995, 1962): Diffusion of innovation, New York, The Free Press 4thed.
  • ROSENBERG, N. (1993): Dentro de la caja negra: tecnología y economía, Barcelona, La Llar del Llibre.
  • SCHNEIBERG, M. (2007): "What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900-1950", Socio-Economic Review, 5, pp. 47-80.
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1911, 1957): Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico: una investigación sobre ganancias, capital, crédito, interés y ciclo económico, México, FCE
  • SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1942, 1971): Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia, Madrid, Aguilar.
  • SEELY BROWN, J. y DUGUID, P. (1991): "Organizational learning and communities-of- practice", Organization Science, 2, pp. 40-57.
  • SERRA RAMONEDA, A. (2001): "Empresa, información y/o conocimiento", en M.A. Durán et al. (eds.), Estructura y cambio social. Homenaje a Salustiano del Campo, Madrid, CIS, pp. 791-808.
  • SPENDER, J.C. (1996): "Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, 45-62.
  • STREECK, W. y SCHMITTER, P. (1985): "Community, market, state - and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order", en W. Streeck y P. Schmitter (eds.), Private Interest Government, London et al., Sage, pp. 1-29.
  • TEECE, D.J., PISANO, G y SHUEN, A. (1997): "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509-533.
  • TUNZELMANN, N. y ACHA V. (2003): Innovation in 'Low-Tech' Industries. University of Sussex, TEARI working paper no 15.
  • WERLE, R. (2005): "Institutionelle Analyse technischer Innovation", Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialforschung, 57 (2), pp. 308-332.
  • WHITLEY, R. (1999): Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • WILLIAMSON, O.E. (1981): "The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach", American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3), pp. 548-577.
  • WILLIAMSON, O.E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York, Free Press.