Responsabilidad social corporativa y resultado financieroevidencia sobre la doble dirección de la causalidad en el sector de las Cajas de Ahorros

Referencias bibliográficas

• Allouche J., Laroche P. A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines 2005, 57:18-41.
• Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 1991, 58:277-297.
• Arora P., Dharwadkar R. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization snack. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2011, 19:136-152.
• Aupperle K.E., Carroll A.B., Hatfield J.D. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 1985, 28:446-463.
• Balado C. La obra social de las cajas: Un paso siempre por delante en RSC. Papeles de Economía Española 2006, 108:144-160.
• Ballarín E. El proceso de dirección en las Cajas de Ahorros. Papeles de Economía Española 1991, 47:25-36.
• Baron D. Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics 2008, 92:268-288.
• Baron D. A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2009, 18:7-43.
• Becchetti L., Di Giacomo S., Pinnacchio D. Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: Evidence from a panel of US listed companies. Applied Economics 2008, 40:541-567.
• Bénabou R., Tirole J. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 2010, 77:1-19.
• Bragdon J.H., Marlin J.A.T. Is pollution profitable?. Risk Management 1972, 19:9-18.
• Brown B., Perry S. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's 'most admired' companies. Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37:1347-1359.
• Buehler V.M., Shetty Y.K. Managerial response to social responsibility challenge. Academy of Management Journal 1976, 19:66-78.
• Cabeza-García L., Martínez-Campillo A., Marbella-Sánchez F. Análisis de la relación entre los resultados sociales y económicos de las cajas de ahorros españolas: Un caso de Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Innovar- Social and Management Sciences Journal 2010, 20:33-46.
• Cals J. Historia Reciente Estrategia Competitiva y Gobierno 2005, Ariel, Barcelona.
• Campbell J.L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:946-967.
• Carbó S., López R. La obra benéfico-social: Exponente de eficiencia y responsabilidad social empresarial. Cuadernos de Información Económica 2004, 182:63-70.
• Carroll A. A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy Management Review 1979, 4:497-505.
• Cespa G., Cestone G. Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economic Management and Strategy 2007, 16:741-771.
• Chand M., Fraser S. The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Industry type as a boundary condition. The Business Review 2006, 5:240-245.
• Chen K.H., Metcalf R.W. The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited. Accounting Review 1980, 55:168-177.
• Chih H., Chih H., Chen T. On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 93:115-135.
• Coffey B.S., Fryxell G.E. Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics 1991, 10:437-444.
• Comisión Europea, 2002. Green Book: promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Disponible en: [consultado 11 Oct 2010]. http://europa.eu.int/comm./employment_social/soc-dial/csr/greenpaper.htm.
• Conine T.E., Madden G.P. Corporate social responsibility and investment value: The expectational relationship. Handbook of Business Strategy 1986, Warren Gorham and Lamont, Boston. W.K. Guth (Ed.).
• Cornell B., Shapiro A.C. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management 1987, 16:5-14.
• Cottrill M.T. Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics 1990, 9:723-729.
• Crane A., McWilliams A., Matten D., Moon J., Siegel D.S. The corporate social responsibility agenda. The Oxford Handbook of CSR 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D.S. Siegel (Eds.).
• De Miguel A., Pindado J., De la Torre Ch. Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25:1199-1207.
• Donker H., Poff D., Zahir S. Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: A look at the Canadian context. Journal of Business Ethics 2007, 82:527-537.
• Dunne P., Hughes A. Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. The Journal of Industrial Economics 1994, 42:115-140.
• Evans D. The relationship between firm growth, size and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics 1987, 35:567-582.
• Fisher K., Schot J. The greening of the industrial firm. Environmental Strategies for Industries: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implementation 1993, Island Press, Washington. K. Fisher, J. Schot (Eds.).
• Fogler H.R., Nutt F. A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal 1975, 18:155-160.
• Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach 1984, Pitman, Boston.
• Friedman M. Capitalism and Freedom 1962, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Friedman, M., 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine (13 September), 32-33.
• Fry L.W., Keim G.D., Meiners R.E. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for profit?. Academy of Management Journal 1982, 25:94-106.
• García-Castro R., Ariño M.A., Canela M.A. Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 92:107-112.
• Garriga E., Melé D. Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics 2004, 53:51-71.
• Godos-Díez J.L., Fernández-Gago R. ¿Cómo se percibe la dirección socialmente responsable por parte de los altos directivos de empresas en España?. Universia Business Review 2011, 29:32-49.
• Gómez-García F. Responsabilidad social corporativa y performance financiero: Treinta y cinco años de investigación empírica en busca de un consenso. Principios: Estudios de Economía Política 2008, 11:5-24.
• Griffin J.J., Mahon J.F. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 1997, 36:5-31.
• Hart S., Christensen C. The great leap. Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. Sloan Management Review 2002, 44:51-56.
• Hausman J. Specification test in economic. Econometrica 1978, 46:1251-1271.
• Hillman A., Keim G. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:125-139.
• Himmelberg C., Hubbard R., Palia D. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 1999, 53:353-384.
• Hu Y., Izumida S. Ownership concentration and corporate performance: A causal analysis with Japanese panel data. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2008, 16:342-358.
• Husted B.W., Allen D.B. Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning 2007, 40:594-610.
• Jaggi B., Freedman M. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business and Finance and Accounting 1992, 19:697-713.
• Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3:305-360.
• Jo H., Harjoto M. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 2011, 103:351-383.
• Johnson R.A., Greening D.W. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42:564-576.
• Kapopoulos P., Lazaretou S. Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Greek firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2007, 15:144-158.
• Klassen R.D., Whybark D.C. The impact on environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42:599-615.
• Kleinbaum D.G., Kupper L.L., Muller K.E. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods 1998, PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston.
• Konar S., Cohen M.A. Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1997, 32:109-124.
• Leech D., Leahy J. Ownership structure, control type classifications and the performance of large British companies. The Economic Journal 1991, 101:1418-1437.
• Lerner L.D., Fryxell G.D. An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 1988, 7:951-959.
• Levy F.K., Shatto G.M. Social responsibility in large electric utility firms: The case for philanthropy. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 1980, 2:237-249.
• Lima, V., De Souza, F., Vasconcellos, F., 2011. Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal 7, 295-309.
• Lindgreen A., Swaen V., Johnston W. Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 85:303-323.
• López M.V., García A., Rodríguez L. Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics 2007, 75:285-300.
• López Iturriaga F., Cepeda R., Cornejo P., Ansola E. La obra social de las cajas de ahorros: Un análisis exploratorio. Universia Business Review 2007, 14:84-95.
• Mahapatra S. Investor reaction to a corporate social accounting. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 1984, 11:29-40.
• Maignan I., Ralston D.A. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses' self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies 2002, 33:497-514.
• Makni R., Francoeur C., Bellavance F. Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 89:409-422.
• Marcus A.A., Goodman R.S. Compliance and performance: Toward a contingency theory. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 1986, 8:193-221.
• Margolis J.D., Walsh J.P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 2003, 48:268-305.
• Margolis J., Elfenbein H., Walsh J. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance 2007, Harvard Business School, Working Paper.
• Marom I.Y. Toward a unified theory of the CSP-CFP link. Journal of Business Ethics 2006, 67:191-200.
• McGuire J.B., Schneeweis T., Branch B. Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management 1990, 16:167-180.
• McGuire J.B., Sundgren A., Schneeweis T. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy Management Journal 1988, 31:854-872.
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. The role of money managers in assessing corporate social responsibility research. Journal of Investing 1997, 6:98-107.
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21:603-609.
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 2001, 25:117-127.
• Mills D.L., Gardner M.J. Financial profiles and the disclosure of expenditures for socially responsible purposes. Journal of Business Research 1984, 12:407-424.
• Mishra S., Suar D. Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies?. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 95:571-601.
• Moore G. Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics 2001, 34:299-315.
• Moskowitz M. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1972, 1:72-75.
• Mueller D. A life cycle theory of the firm. Journal of Industrial Economics 1972, 21:192-219.
• Olcese A. Creación de valor y responsabilidad social de la empresa (RSE) en las empresas del IBEX 35. 2011, Publicaciones de la Real Academia de Ciencias Económicas y Financieras, Barcelona.
• O'Neill H.M., Saunders C.B., McCarthy A.D. Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary?. Journal of Business Ethics 1989, 8:353-357.
• Orlitzky M. Corporate social performance and financial performance: A research synthesis. The Oxford Handbook of CSR 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford UK. A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, D.S. Siegel (Eds.).
• Orlitzky M., Benjamin J.D. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business and Society 2001, 40:369-396.
• Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 2003, 24:403-441.
• Parrino R., Weisbach M.S. Measuring investment distortions arising from stockholder-bondholder conflicts. Journal of Financial Economics 1999, 53:3-42.
• Paton D., Elsayed K.M. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2005, 16:395-412.
• Patten D.M. Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1991, 10:297-308.
• Patten D.M. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting Organizations and Society 2002, 27:763-773.
• Pava M.L., Krausz J. The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics 1996, 15:321-357.
• Peloza J. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 2009, 35:1518-1541.
• Peters R., Mullen M.R. Some evidence of the cumulative effects of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. Journal of Global Business Issues 2009, 3:1-14.
• Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 2006, 84:78-92.
• Preston L.E., O'Bannon D. The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and Society 1997, 36:5-31.
• Quintás J.R. Las Cajas de Ahorros en el ámbito de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Papeles de Economía Española 2006, 108:128-143.
• Reverte C. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2009, 88:351-366.
• Roberts R.W. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1992, 17:595-612.
• Rowley T., Berman S. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business and Society 2000, 39:397-418.
• Salzmann O., Ionescu-Somers A., Steger U. The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal 2005, 23:27-36.
• Seifert B., Morris S.A., Bartkus B.R. Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society 2004, 43:35-161.
• Simpson W.G., Kohers T. The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics 2002, 35:97-109.
• Surroca J., Tribo J.A., Waddock S. The role of intangible resources in explaining the relationship between corporate responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 2010, 31:463-490.
• Udayasankar K. Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 83:167-175.
• Vance S.C. Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks?. Management Review 1975, 64:18-24.
• Van Beurden P., Gössling T. The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 2008, 82:407-424.
• Varadarajan P.R., Menon A. Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing 1988, 52:58-74.
• Villiers Ch., Van Staden Ch. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management 2011, 37:1636-1663.
• Waddock S., Graves S.B. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 1997, 18:303-319.
• Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. Positive Accounting Theory 1986, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• Williamson O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism 1985, Free Press, New York.
• Wright P., Ferris S. Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal 1997, 18:77-83.
• Wu M.L. Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance and firm size: A meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business 2006, 8:163-171.
• Yang F., Lin C., Chang Y. The linkage between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. African Journal of Business Management 2010, 4:406-413.