Diigomarcadores Sociales, Soporte del Aprendizaje e Investigación colaborativa

  1. Estellés Arolas, Enrique 2
  2. Moral Pérez, María Esther del 1
  3. González Ladrón de Guevara, Fernando 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Journal:
RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 1695-288X

Year of publication: 2010

Issue Title: Coloquio hispano-brasileño de informática educativa

Volume: 9

Issue: 2

Pages: 153-166

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa

Abstract

Web 2.0 has originated new applications, like the Social Bookmarking Systems (SBS) with remarkable socializing features, Rather than focusing on the relationship between users, it provides users with the necessary tools to manage and use information that can be later shared. In this article SBS are defined as web applications that can help to store, classify, organize, describe and share multi-format information through links to web sites, blogs, images, wikis, videos and podcasts of interest, emphasizing their advantages for supporting collaborative work. Specifically, Diigo and its contributions will be studied as a metacognitive tool wich makes visible the way each user learns, thinks and develops the knowledge obtained from the information he selects, organizes and categorizes, incrementing its value when sharing it. It facilitates collaborative learning and research through the sharing of tags that describe marked resources giving them high value. Diigo favours the research groups connection thanks to the browsing of the referenced information that has been tagged by others. Everybody can suscribe himself to that information, re-tagging it and adding new nuances. Also favours the information management in the different research phases. Ultimately, it propitiates the collaborative work thanks to the union of the different synergies of the members team, speeding the broadcast of the ideas between interdisciplinary fields and contributing to the collective knowledge development.

Bibliographic References

  • Alonso   Arevalo,   J.   (2009).   Gestores   de   referencias   sociales   |   Universo  Abierto. http://www.universoabierto.com/2562/gestores­de­referencias­ sociales/
  • Bateman, S., Muller, M. J., & Freyne, J. (2009). Personalized retrieval in  social   bookmarking.   In  Proceedings   of   the   ACM   2009   international   Conference  on Supporting Group Work,  91-­94,  Sanibel   Island,  Florida,  USA. ACM. 
  • Cattuto,  C.  (2006).  Semiotic dynamics  in online social  communities.  The  European Physical Journal C ­ Particles and Fields, 46, pp. 33­-37. 
  • Cernea, D. A., AuthorB, M. E., & Labra Gayo, J. E. 2008. SOAF: Semantic  Indexing   System   Based   on   Collaborative   Tagging.  Interdisciplinary  Journal   of   E­Learning   and   Learning   Objects  4,   pp.   137-­150.  http://www.ijello.org/Volume4/IJELLOv4p137­149Cernea.pdf 
  • Colás   Bravo,   P.   (2003).   Internet   y   aprendizaje   en   la   sociedad   del  conocimiento. Comunicar 20; 31­-35. 
  • Del Moral, M. E. & Cernea, D. A. (2006). “Wikis, Folksonomías y Webquests:  trabajo colaborativo a través de Objetos de Aprendizaje”. In Proceedings   of III Simposio Pluridisciplinar sobre Diseño, Evaluación y Descripción de  Contenidos Educativos Reutilizables (SPDECE06) Oviedo, 2006. 
  • Diigo   2006.   Diigo   is   about   Social   Annotation.  http://www.diigo.com/help/about 
  • Dye,   J.   (2006).   Folksonomy:  A   game of   high­tech(and  high­stakes)   tag.  EContent (Wilton, Conn.) 29, 2006. 
  • Golder,  S.  A.,  & Huberman,  B.  A.  2006.  Usage  patterns  of   collaborative  tagging   systems.  Journal   of   Information   Science  32,   198-­208.  http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/2/198 
  • González  Navarro,  M.   (2009).   Los  nuevos   entornos   educativos:   desafíos  cognitivos para una inteligencia colectiva. Comunicar 33; 141-­148. 
  • Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B. & Scott, J. (2005). Social Bookmarking  Tools   (I).  D­Lib   Magazine  11.  http://dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html#3. 
  • Heymann, P.; Koutrika, G. & Molina, H. G. (2008). Can social bookmarking  improve  web   search?   In  WSDM  '08:   Proceedings   of   the   international   conference on Web search and web data mining, 195­-206, New York, NY,  USA. ACM. 
  • Kolay, S. & Dasdan, A. (2009). The value of socially tagged urls for a search  engine. In WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on   World wide web,  1203­-1204, New York, NY, USA. ACM 
  • Mathes,   A.   (2004).   Folksonomies   ­   Cooperative   Classification   and   Communication   Through   Shared   Metadata.   Retrieved   December   22,  2009,   from  http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer­ mediated­communication/folksonomies.html 
  • Millen, D. R.; Whittaker, S. & Yang, M. (2007). Social bookmarking and  exploratory search. ESI, 5. 
  • Millen,   D.;   Feinberg,   J.   &   Kerr,   B.   (2005).   Social   bookmarking   in   the  enterprise. Queue, 3(9), 28­-35. 
  • Monge, S.; Ovelar, R. & Azpeitia, I. (2008). Repository 2.0: Social Dynamics  to   Support   Community   Building   in   Learning   Object   Repositories.  Interdisciplinary Journal of E­Learning and Learning Objects 4, 191­-204. 
  • Moral   Toranzo,   F.   (2009).   Internet   como   marco   de   comunicación   e  interacción social. Comunicar 32; 231­-237. 
  • Nations,  D.   (n.d.).   Social   Bookmarking   –  What   is   Social   Bookmarking?  http://webtrends.about.com/od/socialbookmarking101/p/aboutsocialta gs.htm 
  • Reichel,  M.  &   others   (2006).  Embodied,   Constructionist   Learning:   Social   Tagging   and   Folksonomies   in   E­Learning   Environments.  mICTE   2006.  Conference Proceedings 
  • Rosen, Y. & Rimor, R. (2009). Using a Collaborative Database to Enhance  Students’   Knowledge   Construction.  Interdisciplinary   Journal   of   E­ Learning and Learning Objects 5, 2009, 187-­196. 
  • Singh,   G.;   Hawkins,   L.   &  Whymark,   G.   (2007).   An   integral   model   of  collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of E­Learning   and   Learning   Objects  3,   85-­104.  http://ijello.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p085­105Singh385.pdf 
  • Social bookmarking ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [cited 28 December  2009].   Available   from   world   wide   web:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Bookmarking 
  • Zubiaga, A.; Martínez, R. & Fresno, V. (2009) Getting the most out of social  annotations for web page classification. In  Proceedings of the 9th ACM  Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 74­-83, Munich, Germany. ACM
Data source: Dialnet