¿Qué necesita una empresa para innovar?Investigación, experiencia y persistencia

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, LXIX, 567-574.
• Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in small and large firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78, 678-690.
• Adler, P. S., & Shenbar, A. (1990). Adapting your technological base: the organizational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 25, 25-37.
• Alonso, C., & Forcadell, F. J. (2010). Related diversification and R&D intensity dynamics. Research Policy, 39, 537-548.
• Anand, B., & Galetovic, A. (2000). Weak property rights and hold up in R&D. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 9, 615-642.
• Arundel, A., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27, 127-141.
• Assimakopoulos, D., & Yan, J. (2006). Sources of knowledge acquisition for Chinese software engineers. R&D Management, 3, 97-106.
• Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: expectation, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 1231-1241.
• Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 643-678.
• Benavides, C. A., & Quintana, C. (2008). Generación de conocimiento tecnológico y políticas de innovación: Dimensiones e interrelaciones. Revista de Economía Mundial, 18, 283-297.
• Beneito, P. (2001). R&D productivity and spillovers at the firm level: evidence from Spanish panel data. Investigaciones Económicas, XXV, 289-313.
• Beneito, P. (2003). Choosing among alternative technological strategies: an empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Research Policy, 32, 693-713.
• Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal capacities. Research Policy, 31, 735-747.
• Branstetter, L. (2001). Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconomic evidence from the U.S. and Japan. Journal of International Economics, 53, 53-79.
• Buesa, M., & Molero, J. (1998). La regularidad innovadora en empresas españolas. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 6, 111-133.
• Busom, I. (1991). Impacto de las ayudas públicas a las actividades de I+D de las empresas: un análisis empírico. Revista de Economía Pública, 11, 2-91.
• Busom, I. (1993). Los proyectos de I+D de las empresas: un análisis empírico de algunas de sus características. Revista Española de Economía, Monográfico «Investigación y Desarrollo», 39-65.
• Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29-39.
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92, 1169-1184.
• Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., & Voss, C. A. (1996). Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 105-135.
• Chow, G. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28, 591-605.
• Clausen, T. H. (2011). Examining the Schumpeter hypothesis in the context of closed and open innovation: survey evidence from Norway and Sweden. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12, 158-172.
• Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure". In R. Schmalensee, & R. Willing (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization (pp. 1059-1107). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and motivation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 128-152.
• Collins, J., & Hansen, M. T. (2011). Great by Choice. New York: HarperCollins.
• Cuervo, A. (2008): Discurso de investidura como Doctor Honoris Causa. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Un, C. A. (2010). Why some firms never invest in formal R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 759-779.
• Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42, 693-716.
• De Bondt, R. (1996). Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 1-28.
• De Bondt, R., & Veugelers, R. (1991). Strategic investment with spillovers. European Journal of Political Economy, 7, 345-266.
• Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511.
• Duchesneau, D., Cohn, S. F., & Dutton, J. E. (1979). A Study of Innovation in Manufacturing: Determinants, Processes and Methodological Issues, University of Maine at Orono. Social Science Research Foundation.
• Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, F., & Archibugi, D. (1997). Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research Policy, 26, 521-536.
• Fagerber, J. (2005). Innovation: a guide to the literature. In J. Fagerber, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fluviá, M. (1990). Capital tecnológico y externalidades: un análisis de panel. Investigaciones Económicas, suplemento, 167-172.
• Forcadell, F. J. (2003). Análisis dinámico basado en los recursos de la relación entre recursos tecnológicos y diversificación producto-mercado. Evidencia de las empresas industriales españolas. In J. E. Navas, & M. Nieto (Eds.), Estrategias de Innovación y Creación de Conocimiento Tecnológico en las Empresas Industriales Españolas. Madrid: Fundación Eduardo Barreiros-Thomson Cívitas.
• Galende, J. (2003). Determinantes, patrones y resultados del proceso de innovación de la empresa española. In J. E. Navas, & M. Nieto (Eds.), Estrategias de Innovación y Creación de Conocimiento Tecnológico en las Empresas Industriales Españolas. Madrid: Fundación Eduardo Barreiros-Thomson Cívitas.
• Galende, J., & De la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour. Research Policy, 32, 715-736.
• Galende, J., & Suárez, I. (1999). A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities. Research Policy, 28, 891-905.
• Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: the U.S. pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21, 391-407.
• García, M., & Burns, J. (1999). Sources of technological development in the Spanish food & drink industry: a 'suplier-dominated' industry. Agribusiness: an International Journal, 15, 431-448.
• García, V. J., Jiménez, M., & Llórens, F. J. (2011). Influencia del nivel de aprendizaje en la innovación y desempeño organizativo: Factores impulsores del aprendizaje. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, 161-186.
• Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 365-385.
• Georgsdottir, A. S., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 166-175.
• González, & Nieto, M. (2007). Appropriability of innovation results: An empirical study in Spanish manufacturing firms. Technovation, 27, 280-295.
• González, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazó, C. (1999a). Innovación, costes irrecuperables e incentivos a la I+D. Papeles de Economía Española, 81, 155-166.
• González, X., Jaumandreu, J., & Pazó, C. (1999b). Impacto de las subvenciones en las decisiones de I+D, Fundación Empresa Pública. Documento de Trabajo N, 9905.
• Gottardi, G. (1996). Technology strategies, innovation without R&D and the creation of knowledge within industrial districts. Journal of Industry Studies, 3, 119-134.
• Grabowski, H. G. (1978). The determinants of industrial research and development: a study of the chemical, drug, and petroleum industries. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 292-306.
• Graves, S., & Langowitz, J. (1993). Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 593-605.
• Greene, W. H. (1999). Análisis econométrico. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
• Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23, 737-747.
• Gumbau, M. (1997). Análisis microeconómico de los determinantes de la innovación: aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas. Revista Española de Economía, 14, 41-66.
• Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & Hippel, E. (2003). Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32, 1753-1769.
• Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 15-26.
• Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331-343.
• Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22(3/4), 193-207.
• Itami, H., & Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 625-634.
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
• Janowski, J. E. (1998). R&D: foundation for innovation. Research Technology Management, 41, 14-20.
• Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). The Reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems - The Example of German Biotechnology. Research Policy, 33, 395-408.
• Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 814-829.
• Kleinknecht, A. (1987). Measuring R&D in small firms: how much are we missing? The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 253-256.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383-397.
• Kraft, K. (1989). Market structure, firm characteristics and innovative activity". The Journal of Industrial Economics, XXXVII, 329-336.
• Levin, R. C., Cohen, W. M., & Mowery, D. C. (1985). R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: new evidence on Schumpeterian hypotheses. American Economic Review, 75, 20-24.
• Link, A. L., & Long, J. E. (1981). The simple economics of basic scientific research: a test of Nelson's diversification hypothesis. Journal of Industrial Economics, 30, 105-109.
• Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418-453.
• López, Mielgo N., Montes, J. M., Prieto, J., & Vázquez, C. J. (2008). Análisis de la regularidad innovadora en la empresa industrial española. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 17, 7-28.
• Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (1998). R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management, 28, 263-278.
• Lundvall, B., & Borrás, S. (2005). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Innovation Handbook (pp. 599-631). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lunn, J., & Martin. (1986). Market structure, firm structure, and research and development. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 26, 31-44.
• Macher, J. T., & Mowery, D. C. (2003). Managing learning by doing: An empirical study on semiconductor manufacturing. Product Innovation Management, 20, 391-410.
• Mahoney, J., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363-380.
• Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1990). Technological regimes and patterns of innovation: a theoretical and empirical investigation of the Italian case. In A. Heertje, & M. Perlman (Eds.), Evolving Technology and Market Structure: Studies in Schumpeterian Economics (pp. 283-305). Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
• Mandel, M. (2011). Scale and innovation in today's economy, PPI Policy Memo. Washington: Progressive Policy Institute.
• Mansfield, E. (1988). Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: a comparative study. American Economic Review, 34, 223-228.
• Martín, C. y Rodríguez Romero, L. (1977): Cambio técnico y dependencia tecnológica: el caso de España, Madrid: Fundación INI, Serie E.
• Martin, S., & Scott, J. T. (2000). The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation. Research Policy, 29, 437-447.
• McEvily, S. K., & Chakravarthy, B. (2002). The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 285-305.
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Nieto, M. (2003). Características dinámicas del proceso de innovación tecnológica en la empresa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 9, 111-128.
• Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. (2005). Variables estructurales, capacidad de absorción y esfuerzo innovador en las empresas manufactureras españolas. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 14, 25-44.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Oke, A. (2011). Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants. International Journal of Production Economics, en prensa doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.014.
• Ornaghi, C. (2006). Spillovers in product and process innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 349-380.
• Pérez Cano, C. (2003). La influencia de la transmisión de innovaciones en la elección y efectividad del método de apropiación: un estudio de sus relaciones en las empresas manufactureras españolas. In J. E. Navas, & M. Nieto (Eds.), Estrategias de Innovación y Creación de Conocimiento Tecnológico en las Empresas Industriales Españolas. Madrid: Fundación Eduardo Barreiros-Thomson Cívitas.
• Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-192.
• Pike, S., Roos, G., & Marr, B. (2005). Strategic management of intangible assets and value drivers in R&D organizations. R&D Management, 35, 111-124.
• Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 153-176.
• Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36, 499-515.
• Quelin, B. (2000). Core competencies, R&D management and partnerships. European Management Journal, 18, 476-547.
• Rammer, Czarnitzki, & Spielkamp. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&Dperformers: substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 33, 35-58.
• Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 23-37.
• Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22, 221-239.
• Santamaría, L., Nieto, M. J., & Barge-Gil, A. (2009). Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 36, 507-517.
• Santarelli, E., & Sterlacchini, A. (1990). Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D and firm size: some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2, 223-228.
• Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097-1125.
• Schlicht, E. (1978). Labour turnover, wages structure and natural unemployment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 134, 337-364.
• Souitaris, V. (2002). Firm-specific competencies determining technological innovation: a survey in Greece. R&D Management, 32, 61-77.
• Spencer, J. W. (2003). Firm's knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 217-233.
• Suris, J. M. (1986). La Empresa Industrial Española ante la Innovación Tecnológica. Barcelona: ESADE
• Symeonidis, G. (1996). Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes, OECD Economics Department Working Papers N. 161. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, 87, 242-261.
• Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications of integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-306.
• Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 193-224.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 267-284.
• Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R. P., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence. Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 1-30.
• Velasco, E., & Zamanillo, I. (2008). Evolución de las propuestas sobre el proceso de innovación: ¿ Qué se puede concluir de su estudio? Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 14, 127-138.
• Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26, 303-315.
• Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28, 63-80.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
• Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 76-92.