Impact of the proliferation of information and technology in Higher Education

  1. Martínez García, Javier
Revista:
Aula abierta

ISSN: 0210-2773

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 40

Número: 3

Páginas: 97-106

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Aula abierta

Resumen

La educación superior está experimentando un cambio radical de una enseñanza local y frontal, centrada en el profesor, hacia otra en línea y centrada en el estudiante, donde se contemplan cursos híbridos impartidos por universidades a nivel internacional. La tradicional entrega de conocimiento va siendo complementada y sustituida por modelos de educación digital. La proliferación de información en la web, la proliferación de proveedores de sistemas de instrucción, y la carga que supone para el profesorado el diseño de cursos híbridos conllevan un riesgo para la calidad del aprendizaje digital. En este estudio se examinarán las publicaciones relevantes sobre la calidad de la enseñanza y la pedagogía relativas al e-learning y a la educación a distancia. Asimismo se harán unas recomendaciones con el fin de simplificar el léxico de la educación híbrida y para utilizar taxonomías establecidas de modelos educativos digitales de modo que se pueda mejorar la formación del profesorado en el rediseño de los cursos y en el apoyo institucional para fomentar el desarrollo de una educación moderna de calidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 1- 6.
  • Bates, A. W., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education : Foundations for Success. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
  • Conaway, A. M., Pikas, C. K., McLean, U. E., Morris, S. D., Palmer, L. A., Rosman, L., Sears, S. A., Uzelac, E., & Woodson, S. M. (2010). Designing for information discovery : User needs analysis. Johns Hopkins Applied Technical Digest, 28(3), 290-291.
  • Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended Learning: let’s get beyond the hype, E-Learning. 3(3), 54.
  • Duhaney, D. C. (2004). Blended learning in education, training, and development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 35-38.
  • Duhaney, D. C. (2005). Technology and higher education : Challenges in the halls of academe. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(1), 7-15.
  • Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Moskal, P., Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities : An institutional perspective. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education : Into the Mainstream (pp. 127-148). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
  • Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y, & Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. Education Tech Research Development, 57, 705-720.
  • Futch, L. (2005). A study of blended learning at a metropolitan research university. [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Publication/Order No. 3193475).
  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Greenwood, J. D. (1994). A sense of identity: Prolegomena to a social theory of personal identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 24(1), 25-46.
  • Hartman, J. L., & Truman-Davis, B. (2001). Institutionalizing support for faculty use of technology at the University of Central Florida. In R. M. Epper & A. W. Bates, Teaching faculty how to use technology : Best practices from leading institutions (pp.39-58). Phoenix, AZ : Oryx Press.
  • Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications, 48(10), 59-64.
  • Ho, A., Lu, L., & Thurmaier, K. (2006). Testing the reluctant professor’s hypothesis : Evaluating a blended learning approach to distance education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 81-102.
  • Kahn, B. H. (2007). Flexible learning in an open and distributed environment. In B. H. Kahn (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society (pp. 1-17). Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
  • Laverde, A. C., Yashley, S. C., & Rodriguez, H. Y. R. (2007). Toward an instructional design model based on learning objectives. Education Tech Research Development, 55, 671-681.
  • Maguire, C., & Zhang, J. (2000). Defining blended learning in the GDLN context : Effective blended learning for development, Global Development Learning Network (GDLN). Handout for the Canberra Videoconferencing Workshop of the Association of Asia Pacific GDLN held on April 18, 2011.
  • Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search : From finding to understanding. Communications, 49(4), 41–46.
  • Nygaard, C., & Anderson, I. (2005). Contextual learning in higher education. In R. G. Milter, V. S. Perotti, & M. S. R. Segers (Eds.), Educational innovations in exonomics and business IX, Breaking boundaries for global learning (pp. 277-294). New York, NY : Springer.
  • Nygaard, C., Hojlt, T., & Hermansen, M. (2008). Learning-based curriculum development. Higher Education, 55, 33-50.
  • Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E–Learning, 2(1), 17- 26.
  • Parker, K., Lenhart, A., & Moore, K. (2011). The digital revolution and higher education : College presidents, public differ on value of online learning. Pew Social and Demographic Trends, Pew Research Center. Retrieved http://www. pewsocialtrends.org/2011/08/28/the-digitalrevolution-and-higher-education/
  • Peters, O. (1998). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education. London : Kogan Page.
  • Program in Course Redesign (2005). The National Center for Academic Transformation. Retrieved http://www.thencat.org/PCR.htm
  • Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside : Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved http:// www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/sands2.htm.
  • Voos, R. (2003). Blended learning-What is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View, 2(1). Accessed http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/ view/v2n1/blended1.htm
  • Young, J. R. (2011). College presidents are bullish online education but face a skeptical public. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved http://chronicle.com/article/College-PresidentsAre-Bullish/128814/